Jump to content

Preclosure operator

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

In topology, a preclosure operator or Čech closure operator is a map between subsets of a set, similar to a topological closure operator, except that it is not required to be idempotent. That is, a preclosure operator obeys only three of the four Kuratowski closure axioms.

Definition

A preclosure operator on a set is a map

where is the power set of

The preclosure operator has to satisfy the following properties:

  1. (Preservation of nullary unions);
  2. (Extensivity);
  3. (Preservation of binary unions).

The last axiom implies the following:

4. implies .

Topology

A set is closed (with respect to the preclosure) if . A set is open (with respect to the preclosure) if its complement is closed. The collection of all open sets generated by the preclosure operator is a topology;[1] however, the above topology does not capture the notion of convergence associated to the operator, one should consider a pretopology, instead.[2]

Examples

Premetrics

Given a premetric on , then

is a preclosure on

Sequential spaces

The sequential closure operator is a preclosure operator. Given a topology with respect to which the sequential closure operator is defined, the topological space is a sequential space if and only if the topology generated by is equal to that is, if

See also

References

  1. ^ Eduard Čech, Zdeněk Frolík, Miroslav Katětov, Topological spaces Prague: Academia, Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, 1966, Theorem 14 A.9 [1].
  2. ^ S. Dolecki, An Initiation into Convergence Theory, in F. Mynard, E. Pearl (editors), Beyond Topology, AMS, Contemporary Mathematics, 2009.
  • A.V. Arkhangelskii, L.S.Pontryagin, General Topology I, (1990) Springer-Verlag, Berlin. ISBN 3-540-18178-4.
  • B. Banascheski, Bourbaki's Fixpoint Lemma reconsidered, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae 33 (1992), 303–309.