Talk:Danny Keough

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Merge, 18 October 2024, see discussion.
Keep, May 23, 2005, see discussion.

Article not sourced and person of questionable notability

This article needs to be sourced and the notability of this person should be established.--Fahrenheit451 23:01, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I tagged it as non-notable. I also removed the Project Scientology box since his religion is not even mentioned in the article. Imagine if every Catholic had a Project Roman Catholic box on their bios. Steve Dufour (talk) 15:39, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Expanded the article w/ (35) sources, expanded info on Scientology. Cirt (talk) 00:04, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Cirt. I am still not sure that he is a notable Scientologist however.Steve Dufour (talk) 02:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Perhaps, perhaps not. But he is notable as a person. Cirt (talk) 03:07, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sections

I've divided the article into sections to make it more readable, but the current layout is probably awkward. Ideally, the article should be rewritten and/or rearranged to conform more closely with the Wikipedia formatting guidelines for biographies. Laval (talk) 15:08, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]