File:Constitutional Recognition of Same-Sex Unions in the United States.svg
Appearance

Size of this PNG preview of this SVG file: 800 × 495 pixels. Other resolutions: 320 × 198 pixels | 640 × 396 pixels | 1,024 × 633 pixels | 1,280 × 791 pixels | 2,560 × 1,583 pixels | 959 × 593 pixels.
Original file (SVG file, nominally 959 × 593 pixels, file size: 92 KB)
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 22:32, 27 March 2025 | ![]() | 959 × 593 (92 KB) | GKarastergios | Minor colour fix |
01:42, 27 March 2025 | ![]() | 959 × 593 (92 KB) | GKarastergios | Didn't notice the updated legend, never mind | |
15:29, 26 March 2025 | ![]() | 959 × 593 (92 KB) | GKarastergios | Fixed NY color | |
15:00, 26 March 2025 | ![]() | 959 × 593 (92 KB) | GKarastergios | NY is closer to explicit. (Explicit: State constitution explicitly enshrines marriage equality and/or prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. Implicit: Interpreted by a court ruling via a state equal protection clause or similar (not federal)) | |
06:06, 25 March 2025 | ![]() | 959 × 593 (92 KB) | Robsalerno | Reverted to version as of 03:57, 14 February 2025 (UTC) -- there's an important distinction between implicit and explicit recognition. In explicit recognition, the constitution has been explicitly written to say marriage is a union between two people; in implicit recognition, courts have read a right to marriage into the constitution via other sections on due process or equal treatment | |
00:50, 14 March 2025 | ![]() | 959 × 593 (89 KB) | Ratherous | Unclear on Florida | |
23:29, 13 March 2025 | ![]() | 959 × 593 (89 KB) | Ratherous | Florida bans other unions as well. Unifying implicit and explicit recognition as lines are blurred. California can also be argued as implicit. If anyone staunchly disagrees I'm open to this being reverted. | |
03:57, 14 February 2025 | ![]() | 959 × 593 (92 KB) | Robsalerno | new mexico, new jersey, iowa, massachusetts, and connecticut supreme courts all ruled that their state constitutions require same-sex marriage | |
19:29, 30 December 2024 | ![]() | 959 × 593 (92 KB) | Robsalerno | Hawaii; with the ban deleted, the 1993 court ruling that found an implicit right to same-sex marriage in the constitution stands | |
17:49, 18 November 2024 | ![]() | 959 × 593 (92 KB) | GKarastergios | Added NY Proposal 1 (2024) |
File usage
The following 7 pages use this file:
- Same-sex marriage law in the United States by state
- Same-sex marriage law in the United States by territory
- U.S. state constitutional amendments banning same-sex unions
- User talk:Hekerui/Archive 10
- Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Images to improve/Archive/Dec 2006
- Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Map workshop/Archive/May 2012
- File talk:Same-sex marriage in the United States.svg/Archive 4
Global file usage
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on fa.wikipedia.org
- Usage on hu.wikipedia.org