Jump to content

H. J. McCloskey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Henry John McCloskey)

H. J. McCloskey
Born1925
Died2000
EducationUniversity of Melbourne
OccupationPhilosopher

Henry John McCloskey (1925–2000) was an Australian moral philosopher and writer. McCloskey was Professor of Philosophy at La Trobe University in Melbourne.[1] After graduating from the University of Melbourne, he had appointments at the University of Western Australia and the University of Melbourne before taking up a chair at La Trobe. He was president of the Australasian Association of Philosophy in 1978.[1]

McCloskey is known for his sheriff scenario, a thought experiment he used to criticize "extreme" utilitarianism, or what later came to be known as act utilitarianism. He was married to Mary Agnes McCloskey.[2] McCloskey was an atheist. He argued that the problem of evil provides conclusive evidence against theism. McCloskey was a noted critic of animal rights.[3][4] McCloskey stated that animals cannot have moral rights but they can be given legal rights.[5]

Selected publications

[edit]

Articles

Books

  • Morality Without Religion (1961)
  • The Problem of Liberalism (1965)
  • Utilitarian and Retributive Punishment (1967)
  • Meta-ethics and Normative Ethics (1969)
  • The Political Philosophy of Liberalism (1973)
  • John Stuart Mill: A Critical Study (1971)
  • God and Evil (1974)
  • Ecological Ethics and Politics (1983)

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b "Professor John McCloskey". Rationalist Society of Australia. Rationalist Society of Australia. 2 June 2019. Retrieved 21 October 2020.
  2. ^ "Mary Agnes McCloskey". Legacy.com. Retrieved 3 November 2021.
  3. ^ Regan, Tom (1976). "McCloskey on Why Animals Cannot Have Rights". The Philosophical Quarterly. 26 (104): 251–257. doi:10.2307/2219017. JSTOR 2219017.
  4. ^ Burch, Robert W. (1977). "Animals, Rights, and Claims". The Southwestern Journal of Philosophy. 8 (2): 53–59. doi:10.5840/swjphil19778225. JSTOR 43155153.
  5. ^ Nelson, John O. (1987). "Brute Animals and Legal Rights". Philosophy. 62 (240): 171–177. doi:10.1017/S0031819100064019. JSTOR 3750794. S2CID 159507180.