Talk:Badhaai Do

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

LGBTQ+ studies Start‑class

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Protected edit request on 11 February 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Request to remove the controversy section entirely as it was before the content dispute erupted until a consensus version is obtained. As it stands, its written contrary to WP:CSECTION guidelines and sourced only to a self-published youtube video. -- Ab207 (talk) 18:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I fully second this suggestion. The controversy section definitely doesn't follow guidelines and should be removed. Also can we resolve this so we can add more content to the article post release of the film? the current full protection is just a fruitless stand still. -- Meryam90 (talk)

I have raised a request for reduce in protection level. Hope that will help. Kpddg ^(talk ^• ^contribs) 14:32, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The request has been declined, as consensus needs to be established. (see this). So I too support that the controversy section should be removed as of now, till there are more reliable sources. Kpddg ^(talk ^• ^contribs) 14:46, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for raising a request. Neysara had added similar content from the same source to other LGBT-related Bollywood films (Chandigarh Kare Ashiqui and Gangubai Kathiawadi). They have been eventually removed by uninvolved users but this one remains. -- Ab207 (talk) 15:20, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:42, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 12 February 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

2405:204:281:B961:0:0:F8:38B1 (talk) 04:41, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gross - 1.20 crores

Note: It would be done if you could cite a reliable source to support that figure. Regards, DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 19:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:43, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Protected edit request on 12 February 2022 (2)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please change the character's name of Chum Darang from Chenakki to Rimjhim. Regards, DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 19:37, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: A simple google search would suffice to substantiate the above change. But here are one and two. Regards, DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 04:00, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:43, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Add cast members

Add Gulshan Devaiah's name in the cast as Guru Narayan, Shardul's boyfriend. He did a fabulous job. FieryAriesKS (talk) 06:05, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Misuse of protection

I think it the protection for the page is being misused as some of the editors are not able to improve the page. The cast is not totally right, some characters are named wrong and some are missing. The controversy section should not be here as it is not sourced perfectly. The plot is also not added. 2409:4041:6E1E:B050:F02E:42E:23EA:B14D (talk) 14:04, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have raised a request for reduce in protection level. Hope that will help. Kpddg ^(talk ^• ^contribs) 14:32, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]