This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
Contralateral brain is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
The "Theories" section seems to mostly be written in support of this publication: https://peerj.com/articles/7096/ —Is the Wikipedia article biased or being used to strengthen the publication linked? ( rcbarnes, 21:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC) ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rcbarnes (talk • contribs)
Surely, this should not be the impression. Indeed, there is very little scientific literature on theories, given that the contralateral organization of the brain is such a well-known phenomenon. Possibly the opening paragraph of the "Theories" section should be made less concise (i.e. listing earlier proposals more explicitly) and the reference to https://peerj.com/articles/7096/ removed (it is cited again later). Is that what you mean? Marci68 (talk) 06:27, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]