Talk:List of manias

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Glossaries (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glossaries, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.GlossariesWikipedia:WikiProject GlossariesTemplate:WikiProject GlossariesGlossaries articles

Move

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was no consensus to move. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:41, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Glossary of manias → -mania — This should never have been moved. The subject should be -mania, the English suffix. Irbisgreif (talk) 02:32, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Support. While this may not theoretically follow the WP:MOS, the article is about a bound morpheme. Irbisgreif (talk) 02:34, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it's about a bound morpheme then it needs to be deleted. If it's about a form of insanity/excess that doesn't necessarily end in 'mania' then you get to keep it. Them's the rules.- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 15:25, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note it's considered bad form to vote and propose.- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 15:26, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"It's considered bad form to vote and propose." Really? I would say the opposite. I've made some proposals I don't support and some I do. It's better to be clear. — AjaxSmack 15:34, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Current name avoids WP:DICDEF arguments for deletion. --Cybercobra (talk) 02:38, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn't List of manias be more in line with similar articles at Wikipedia? — AjaxSmack 15:09, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Glossaries are lists anyway; lists of words with definitions. To be honest they sit very uncomfortably in an encyclopedia; they probably should all be moved to become appendixes in the Wiktionary.- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 15:25, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, glossaries are lists and my point was that, at Wikipedia, they are usually titled "List of XXX". — AjaxSmack 15:36, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have a reference to that being a generally agreed guideline or policy?- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 16:47, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Glossaries would probably beg to differ. --Cybercobra (talk) 18:44, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't say "guideline or policy". I said "usually." WikiProject Glossaries can beg all it wants. Link to the articles at Portal:Contents/List of glossaries/Society and social sciences for actual examples. — AjaxSmack 18:58, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose unless you want the article deleted, in which case, go ahead.- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 15:25, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Per Wikipedia:Naming conventions, non-alphanumeric characters should be avoided, especially as the first character of a page name. More importantly, pages dedicated principally to the definition and dictionary-like explanation of suffixes are frequently brought up at AfD. Names that draw attention to word form, rather than conceptual meaning, invite such deletion. Cnilep (talk) 19:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. I would support moving to List of manias, and making this about the psychological conditions only. Jafeluv (talk) 09:08, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose — I would support moving to List of manias
— $V = I * R$ (talk) 20:24, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

I am not apposed to the move. At the beggining of 2009 the list was completely out of date so I have made a number of additions. I will be making more additions throughout 2010. If anyone wants to talk to me about this email me on SMargan@bigpond.net.au —Preceding unsigned comment added by SMargan (talk • contribs) 03:07, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Correction

The definition of "dacnomania" is incorrect. I'm changing it. http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dacnomania

This wrong definition might have been a wrong translation from italian, "mordere", which means "to bite" instead of "to murder". --Monsieur.lefou (talk) 21:37, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is it a joke?

The term 'monomania' is listed twice. Well played Wikipedia. Well played. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.189.178.84 (talk) 23:48, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 January 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to List of manias. No such user (talk) 13:15, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Glossary of manias → List of manias – I think this page better fits the definition of a list of manias, than it does what we normally think of as a glossary. List of manias is already a redirect, and very few pages link here currently, so swapping them over should be relatively painless. There was a move request a long time ago so I can't be sure this is uncontentious (note that even back then 'List of manias' was actually a common suggestion.) JeffUK 17:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. This article is structured as a Glossary. Rreagan007 (talk) 20:18, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But it's not a very well structured glossary, the definitions of the words aren't even full sentences, whereas if they were in a list with an 'Obsession' column it would make a whole lot more sense. It's a bit of a catch-22, I can easily restructure it to a list, I think that would look a lot better to as per List_of_phobias; but while it's called 'Glossary' that would be strange. I suppose I could do this on List of manias now leaving this here to see which works best. JeffUK 22:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - lists are more appropriate for an encyclopedia Red Slash 23:12, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Better Sources.

'Pseudomania' leads to an external site, as opposed to wiktionary/dedicated page. 82.47.246.231 (talk) 00:43, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]