Talk:Harmony with nature

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:

[[Naturales quaestiones#Subject|Naturales quaestiones]] The anchor (#Subject) has been deleted by other users before.

The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.

Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

Removed copy to wikisource

For the article to be moved to wikisource it needs to be in the public domain and have a suitable licence that allows it to be hosted. At this point there is no evidence provided that it is the case. Is there a link to an official translation, or the official English version? — billinghurst sDrewth 08:36, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Small evaluation

This article provides a very well introductory section that gives the reader a clear indication on what this article addresses. The lead does include a brief but intensive description of each of the sections that are covered. Each section heading that is outlined in the lead is briefly but also precisely summarized in words that are comprehendible for every reader that is interested.

Reptilelover21 (talk) 03:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]