Talk:New Jersey Route 59

New Jersey Route 59 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 27, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: State highways / New Jersey Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

U.S. state highways

Locations

New Jersey

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	This article was the selected article of the New Jersey task force in February 2015.

New Jersey Mid‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Direction of road

According to the SLD and the picture in the article, NJ 59 is a north-south road. Therefore, the route description needs to be flipped to describe the route in this manner. Dough4872 (talk) 01:20, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I feel the state is wrong, as angle shows it as an east/west route. :| - The route goes northwest to southeast.Mitch32^{(Want help? See here!)} 01:23, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since the state is the official source for designating the highway, we need to go with them, regardless of whether the highway is more of an east-west road. Dough4872 (talk) 01:40, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:New Jersey Route 59/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman 03:36, 27 November 2009 (UTC) The article is nice, though I was originally concerned about how short it was, despite the fact that it is indeed the shortest NJ state route. I'll pass it since there's not really anything that could be added; not much you can do with a .15 mi road. I'd ask for a map addition, but it's not a requirement given how short the road is. Wizardman 03:36, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Jersey Route 59. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628183145/http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1953_New_Jersey_state_highway_renumbering to http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1953_New_Jersey_state_highway_renumbering

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]