This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
On the 2021 study: I don't want to call the scientist or journal a "no-name" (I'm not hugely familiar with either, but it seems like it meets WP:RS). That said, the framing of the study as "HAH—checkmate, Trumpists!" is undue, and damages the credibility of Wikipedia and science as a nonpartisan search for truth. It might be appropriate to discuss it in some other context, but we shouldn't be promoting a single primary source like this as though it's the final word on this question. – Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 20:09, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
This page is editorial and it's explanation of Trump derrangement syndrome. It offers opinions, as if they were the truth however, it does not give light to facts from both sides nor does it allow for parody and humor. The article states that it is a pejorative that does not take a new account. The fa "facts". However, it does not offer the truth behind claimed "facts". 2600:1010:B113:F767:B5A5:598B:130F:93D2 (talk) 07:03, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 09:38, 22 January 2025 (UTC)