Template talk:More citations needed

Template:More citations needed is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.

Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the More citations needed template.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5: 3 months

This template was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

No consensus, 4 April 2022, see discussion.
Keep, 28 July 2021, see discussion.
SNOW keep, 25 January 2018, see discussion.
Keep, 9 April 2011, see discussion.
Keep, 20 September 2007, see discussion.

Template-protected edit request on 17 April 2023

This edit request to Template:More citations needed section has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add a parameter so that it would be "adding citations to reliable sources at this section" in Template:More citations needed section. Thank you. Timothytyy (talk) 13:11, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Completed – now, template {{More citations needed section}} reads "Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section." (seems to be a little stronger than "at this section") P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 22:57, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request 2 August 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Description of suggested change: give the name parameter a description or remove it as its probably widely unknown what its for — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael21107 (talk • contribs) 14:55, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Feel free to edit the TemplateData yourself. That doesn't require TPER rights. Removing the |name= parameter would require a broader discussion and/or a better justification before it could be implemented. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:37, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request 12 August 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Description of suggested change: Make the auto value of "affected area" section, as done in Template:Unreferenced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TypistMonkey (talk • contribs) 03:21, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: in the {{Unreferenced}} template, the "auto value" is actually "article", which has been corrected in the template data part of the documentation. In this template the auto value of the "affected area" is also "article" and can be changed to "section" with the #1 unnamed parameter, for example, |1=section. Thank you for your improvements! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 11:46, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove JSTOR

Please remove JSTOR from suggestions, JSTOR#Access is not oriented to Open access content! 2804:7F0:B340:F41:D04C:EC2F:F3CF:7868 (talk) 11:55, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]