Jump to content

User talk:CycoMa2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:CycoMa)

Hello

Women in Red July 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | July 2025, Vol 11, Issue 7, Nos. 326, 327, 341, 342, 343


Online events:

Announcements:

Progress ("moving the needle"):

  • Statistics available via Humaniki tool. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,514 articles during this period!
  • 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280 bios; 415,618 women)
  • 23 Jun 2025: 20.130% (2,072,236 bios; 417,132 women)

Tip of the month:

  • A nuanced article is more useful than a shiny pedestal. Readers can find hope in your subject's survival or achievements,
    but they can also learn from your subject's mistakes and limitations.

Other ways to participate:

--Lajmmoore (talk 09:19, 30 June 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Notability and biographies

[edit]

I know some people are gonna point out notability and NOTGENEAOLOGY with some of the biographies I am writing.

I am totally aware of these policies the reason I have all these biographies is because every single one of these individuals are important to the historical narrative.

For example, Draft:Michel Cadotte, Jr was involved in the war of 1812 and numerous historians written about his involvement in the war. They also talk about how he was an interpreter. He was also apparently involved in a land ownership controversy.(This controversy apparently lasted for decades.) And he married a chief’s daughter.

So by all measurements he is notable.

This is the same case with the Hatfields.

Both families I am writing about have alot of notable members.

I don’t think there are any notable members who past the 1940s. So I am gonna stop once I reach that point.

Basically the reason why I have so many biographies is because this is one of those unique cases where the entire family is notable.

The issue is that information for many of these individuals is hard to create biographies for. There is numerous reasons for this. CycoMa2 (talk) 00:05, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know alot of y’all are most interested in other topics I write about.
Don’t worry I haven’t abandoned biology, religion, or mythology topics. I am just busy with writing about history. History is just a topic I have always wanted to write more about. CycoMa2 (talk) 00:24, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of allegedly cursed objects for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of allegedly cursed objects is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of allegedly cursed objects until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:41, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]