Jump to content

User talk:Amaury

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Donald Duck)
It is approximately 10:42 PM where this user lives.

Archive Statistics

  • The numbers in the cells indicate how many total discussions there are for each year, each month, and overall.
Month 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total
January 12 11 0 0 0 0 0 8 13 7 17 5 3 6 0 2 84
February 13 35 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 8 12 10 5 2 1 1 105
March 11 24 0 0 1 0 42 6 13 10 8 7 4 1 4 0 131
April 20 25 0 1 0 0 38 6 11 14 10 14 5 2 1 1 148
May 23 13 0 10 12 0 15 4 18 15 7 5 1 5 0 1 129
June 14 4 0 1 39 0 10 6 15 14 9 3 9 4 4 2 134
July 20 3 0 1 14 0 18 12 13 20 16 4 2 5 2 1 131
August 8 34 0 0 3 0 7 12 19 13 14 4 0 2 1 0 117
September 8 5 0 0 0 0 9 9 6 13 5 4 7 5 3 1 75
October 24 5 0 0 0 0 6 21 16 10 5 1 6 8 2 0 104
November 11 0 0 0 0 0 4 9 7 13 9 5 3 4 5 5 75
December 0 9 4 0 0 0 0 5 13 18 15 8 10 6 6 3 97
Total 0 173 163 0 13 69 0 154 115 158 152 120 72 51 50 26 14 1,330

December 2024

May I ask why have you reverted my edit here? She has Bulgarian nationality, by her own admission. Andro611 (talk) 15:53, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) Please read MOS:CITIZEN. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:32, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
MOS:CITIZEN is about stating ethnicity in the lede. I didn't add her Bulgarian nationality in the lede, I simply added her in a category of Bulgarian actresses (which she is). The talk page discussion said nothing about her not being a Bulgarian national, therefore I deem it is appropriate to add her into the category of Bulgarian actresses. Best regards. Andro611 (talk) 00:34, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The same thing applies to categories. Do not add it again. Amaury11:15, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Where is that stated? The MoS only refers to the opening paragraph, not categories. Why shouldn't she be in a category of Bulgarian actresses if she is an actress and possess Bulgarian nationality? Andro611 (talk) 19:23, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How don't have much experience with this one, but they seem to be only editing Spongebob, but have come across someone editing Rubble and Crew changing airdates around, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/ICarlyFan060823Creddie. Was this the same behavior you have seen with this person. Want to check with you before I file a sock case. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 15:32, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays!

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Warning: misuse of rollback

Hi User:Amaury, I don't know if you got the message on Talk:Tanner Buchanan or not, but please: do not use rollback to revert edits that are not obvious vandalism, sockpuppet edits or anything that isn't under the valid criteria for the use of rollback.

I fail to see how diff 1, diff 2, diff 3, diff 4, diff 5, diff 6, diff 7, diff 8, diff 9, diff 10 are all correct uses of rollback under that criteria.

On the article Zoey 101, it's even worse. You edit warred with another user, by reverting their constructive change of the logo three times using rollback (diff 11, diff 12, diff 13). This could've easily resulted in loss of rollback privileges if someone had reported you to the administrators.

Diff 14, diff 15, diff 16 are correct uses of rollback, although usually you would also want to place an appropriate warning on the user's talk page regarding their unconstructive edit (e.g. for diff 16 I would've definitely sent a warning regarding adding spam links to articles).

But when it comes to reverting an edit that is constructive in at least some form of way, always try to provide an explanation why you had to revert that edit. Otherwise, the other editor will fail to see why their edits had been reverted, and just silently reverting edits without apparent reason is like a business kicking out a would-be customer who just wants to enquire about something there. — AP 499D25 (talk) 01:09, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Hey, Amaury. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 04:08, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrative action review regarding your continued abuse of rollback. Thank you. — AP 499D25 (talk) 05:23, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]