User talk:NewTestLeper79

This user may have left Wikipedia. NewTestLeper79 has not edited Wikipedia since 2 November 2019. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome to my talk page!

Please use the Reply button to reply to a message, or add topic (+) to start a new section.
If I have left a message on your talk page, please DO NOT post a reply here, instead, reply there.
- Mention me using the "Mention a user" button in the Reply box or type out {{ping|NewTestLeper79}}.
- I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
If you prefer to manually edit the page to post:
- Use an accurate and appropriate heading.
- Indent your comment by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
- Sign your post with four tildes (~~~~) at the end.

Archived talk pages: EARLIEST · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · MOST RECENT

Nick Anderton

Ever thought about looking for a source rather than vandalising articles? Giant Snowman 18:45, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ettrick Bay

@NewTestLeper79: I did leave you a message a while ago but it never took. I saw you copy-edited the above article. It is a geographical article and stacked full of measurements including bearings, heights, orientations etc. That is from references. The article needs a copyedit, sure but if you remove salient information that reduce the quality of the article, I'll revert it every time. I have other bay articles that need done. Fire in, but leaves the bearings. scope_creep^Talk 23:22, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yarmouth, Maine

Hi @NewTestLeper79:, I had a look at your Yarmouth, Maine article your working on, in passing. You will need to slim it right down and soon. It has become entirely non encyclopedic. I know these town articles tend to explode as folk write their own personal histories on web and that get wrapped into the article content, but they tend to be non-notable. Listing train times what. If you don't do it, a copyeditor or somebody will come in and cut it to the bone and they won't be sympathetic to the subject. More than 50% of it is non notable. One top of that if it gets too big it send to Afd as WP:TNT and it will get deleted and start again because nobody want to work on. scope_creep^Talk 11:42, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. ;) - NewTestLeper79 talk 12:23, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Transfers

Hello, Please do not revert the transfer section again. On all previous Blackpool F.C.'s season pages your version is not consistent with them, also it's not consistent with other club season pages. Please keep until you give me one reason as to why your version is deserved to be the one. Many thanks. --Skyblueshaun (talk) 17:31, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Paul Hipp (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Bucket list and Kevin Morris

Norman Lear (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bucket list

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:06, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You have been around long enough to know that Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. I've added a source at Adi Yussuf, but please ensure you include one yourself in future. Giant Snowman 11:33, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Picture This – All Around and in the Crowd

The article Picture This – All Around and in the Crowd has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since 2006

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Another Believer _(Talk) 00:35, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

Proposed deletion of Wet Wet Wet: The Greatest Hits and More

The article Wet Wet Wet: The Greatest Hits and More has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since creation, no indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JaneciaTaylor (talk) 22:41, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

Proposed deletion of Playing Away at Home

The article Playing Away at Home has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since creation, no indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JaneciaTaylor (talk) 22:44, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

Proposed deletion of Wets at the Castle

The article Wets at the Castle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable video release. The reference only refers to the fact they played at the castle not about the video.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JaneciaTaylor (talk) 23:06, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Playing Away at Home.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Playing Away at Home.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WWW Greatest Hits and More.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WWW Greatest Hits and More.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Crest cert 178x242.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crest cert 178x242.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rebecca Croft for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rebecca Croft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Croft until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:01, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please upload free images to Commons!

Hello! Thanks for uploading free images to Wikipedia! As you may know, there is another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please consider uploading media there instead (see m:Help:Unified login). That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may view your previous uploads here). Note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons, and uploads of non-U.S. works are normally allowed only if the work is either in the public domain or covered by a valid free license in both the U.S. and the country of origin of the work. Thanks, and I hope you enjoy contributing in the future! --Animalparty! (talk) 06:03, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Buck, Right Friends.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Buck, Right Friends.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:20, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Norwich City F.C. captains has been nominated for deletion

Category:Norwich City F.C. captains has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Echetus Xe 18:18, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Richard Payne (musician)

The article Richard Payne (musician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Very thinly sourced BLP of a non-notable subject with an unclear redirect target.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:32, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Finlay Macintyre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Finlay Macintyre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finlay Macintyre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lettler^hello 04:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lists of nicknames in association football for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lists of nicknames in association football is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of nicknames in association football until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 10:09, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians interested in RC Strasbourg

Category:Wikipedians interested in RC Strasbourg has been proposed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 October 8#Category:Wikipedians who like Cocotama. – Fayenatic London 21:17, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Boubacar Coulibaly (footballer, born 1985)

The article Boubacar Coulibaly (footballer, born 1985) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 15:10, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nicola Bell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicola Bell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicola Bell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

–Davey2010^Talk 19:00, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeri Weil for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeri Weil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeri Weil until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Clarityfiend (talk) 23:29, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Howie Carr Show logo.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Howie Carr Show logo.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Pbrks (talk) 14:21, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bluetonic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bluetonic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bluetonic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

– DarkGlow • 19:24, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bluetonic.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bluetonic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:SJFA East Regional Divisions

Template:SJFA East Regional Divisions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 07:21, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:SJFA East Premier League

Template:SJFA East Premier League has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 07:22, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:SJFA East Super League

Template:SJFA East Super League has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 07:22, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James Banks (footballer)

The article James Banks (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable athlete - does not meet WP:GNG or any WP:NSPORT guideline. Unable to find any non-database coverage. —Ganesha811 (talk) 23:06, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Ganesha811 (talk) 23:06, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rachel McLean

Hello, NewTestLeper79. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rachel McLean, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Connolly WToNZ.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Connolly WToNZ.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:4 Day Weekend.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:4 Day Weekend.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Ossian's Hall.jpg

The file File:Ossian's Hall.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused image, no context to determine possible future use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 08:12, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]