User talk:Beeblebrox
(Redirected from User talk:Just Step Sideways)
No RfXs since 03:58, 23 March 2025 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online |
| V | Dec | Jan | Feb | Mar | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CfD | 0 | 0 | 3 | 131 | 134 |
| TfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |
| MfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| FfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| RfD | 0 | 0 | 8 | 81 | 89 |
| AfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
- 3 bot-reported usernames for administrator attention
- 7 user-reported usernames for administrator attention
- 9 bot-generated requests for intervention against vandalism
- 10 user-generated requests for intervention against vandalism
- 70 sockpuppet investigations
- 63 Candidates for speedy deletion
- 1 Fully protected edit requests
- 1 Candidates for history merging
- 10 requests for RD1 redaction
- 160 elapsed requested moves
- 6 Pages at move review
- 27 requested closures
- 28 requests for unblock
- 0 Wikipedians looking for help from administrators
- 61 Copyright problems
Arbitration Committee proceedings
- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.
[edit]
Recently closed cases (Past cases)
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
| Request name | Motions | Case | Posted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clarification request: Off-wiki misconduct in Palestine–Israel topic area | none | (orig. case) | 22 March 2025 |
| Clarification request: Palestine-Israel articles 5 | none | (orig. case) | 25 March 2025 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
−
- The article was deleted after an Articles for Deletion discussion. However, I believe that the decision should be reconsidered because I can provide additional reliable sources that establish the company’s notability. If possible, I would like the article restored as a user draft so I can improve it and resubmit it through the Articles for Creation (AfC) process. Thank you. Sukikowsik (talk) 05:29, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Sukikowsik: You may find you get better results when starting a new conversation if you use the "new section" button instead of replying to an existing post that is not relevant to what you are trying to discuss, and maybe provide some context and a header, as I have now done.
- I don't think there is any grounds to reconsider the result of the deletion discussion as consensus was clear, with three comments in favor of deletion and none in favor of keeping, However, as you state you believe you cvan rectify the issues identified I have restored it as a regular draft at Draft:Samugam Media. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 20:53, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Do me a favor would you?
[edit]And take a look at WP:LASTWORD. Logoshimpo (talk) 18:06, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not really active right now and frankly don't recall whatever it is you are vaguely complaining about, but I'm guessing that if I did recall I probably don't care anyway.
- So how about you do me a favor and either make coherent comments with an actual purpose or go away? Thanks. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 20:45, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
I’m in need of editing advice
[edit]Hello, I was wondering if you could give me some advice and tips on how to become a better editor? I feel as if I’m not good enough, and you’re the most talented/professional editor I could find. Please reach back when you can :).
Sincerely and with Admiration, TJ Kreen TJ Kreen (talk) 23:05, 22 March 2025 (UTC)