Jump to content

User talk:~delta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user is a WikiGryphon.
This user uses AntiVandal to revert vandalism
This user is a member of WikiProject Korea.
This user is a member of the Counter-Vandalism Unit.
This user is on the Wikimedia Community Discord.
This user has AWB permissions on the English Wikipedia and uses JavaScript Wiki Browser.
Die Fliege
Email this user
This user is a recent changes patroller.
This user uses RedWarn for the quickest vandalism reverts in the west (yee-haw!)
This user regularly listens to music on Spotify.
Trout this user
This user uses Twinkle to fight vandalism.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Prodraxis)

Welcome to my talk page.

Talk page stalkers are welcome - as long as they follow Wikimedia policies.
  • If you send me a message here, I will reply here on my talk page. If I leave a message on your talk page, please reply to me there.
  • Always sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~).
  • Please assume good faith, be civil, refrain from canvassing and follow other Wikimedia policies.
  • As for contentious topics, please assume that I am aware of all of them.
  • I'd prefer to keep this talk page only for local English Wikipedia issues - if you want to leave me a message regarding something related to another project, please do it on my talk page on that project.
  • Sometimes, this page may be semiprotected due to vandalism; if it is (and you are not registered or not autoconfirmed) and you need to leave me a message, feel free to do it at User talk:~delta/Non-protected talk page.
  • Prefer to contact me privately? If so, please email me using the page linked here. I am also on the Wikimedia Discord server under the username prodraxis.

Question from Jimstarkband (23:34, 13 April 2025)

[edit]

Hi delta, thank you for mentoring. I had made my first edit earlier today, and thought I did everything right. However, a MrOllie (with what appears to be extensive experience) reverted it.

I emailed info, and received a helpful reply from Geoffery Lane at the Help Desk Info Center, which prompted me to create an account. I'm not sure how I'd use it outside this edit, but I welcome learning more. --Jimstarkband (talk) 23:34, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there @Jimstarkband, sorry for the late response - I was offline for a long time because I was out of town. Your edit was reverted as promotional as it seemed to lack reliable sources and included primary sources, which are not deemed reliable in Wikipedia policy. Furthermore, the sources you cited appear to be opinion pieces which are usually discouraged for citing. Granted, I am no theater expert, but maybe these pages can help you with regards to your edits. ~deltasock (talk • cont) 04:35, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ok...
What does... how is a production supposed to be cited, then? If the company site that hosted the factual information (location of performances, dates of performances, authors) isn't suitable, and the reviews by reputable independent reviewers are considered opinion pieces when their only purpose was to confirm this adaptation exists...
I'm really not trying to be rude here, but i do not understand what COULD be considered a reliable source, when these aren't. Help? Jimstarkband (talk) 02:45, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also, and sorry for not including this, but i hope you had a nice time out of town. Vacations are obviously vital, and i appreciate your help here, no worries regarding the timing. Thanks. Jimstarkband (talk) 02:46, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please see this page for guidelines regarding reliable sourcing. Best, ~deltasock (talk • cont) 17:49, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
so, maybe I've missed it, that's possible, but I posted 2 reviews of the production by reputable sites in the field. These aren't like the examples of letters to the editor or opinion pieces, but they are reviews of the production which are standard practice for live theatre.
And their usage wasn't even to comment on the overall quality of the production, which would be opinion, but instead were establishing the existence of the production without using self-published sources (like i imagine the production company's website to be).
In what fashion, if reviews are not allowed and the company's website isn't allowed, are we able to verify the existence of said production? I don't mean that rudely, I'm curious.
Thanks for any assistance you can give. Jimstarkband (talk) 16:15, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol May 2025 Backlog drive

[edit]
May 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 May 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Pages Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:26, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from JosiahDunbar (14:21, 26 April 2025)

[edit]

Hello, Can you make me one? --JosiahDunbar (talk) 14:21, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2025 May newsletter

[edit]

The second round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 28 April at 23:59 UTC. To reiterate what we said in the previous newsletter, we are no longer disqualifying contestants based on how many points (now known as round points) they received. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receive tournament points at the end of each round. These tournament points are carried over between rounds, and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers at the end of each round. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned.

Round 2 was quite competitive. Four contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and eight scored more than 500 points (including one who has withdrawn). The following competitors scored at least 800 points:

In addition, we would like to recognize Generalissima (submissions) for her efforts; she scored 801 round points but withdrew before the end of the round.

The full scores for round 2 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 13 featured articles, 20 featured lists, 4 featured-topic articles, 138 good articles, 7 good-topic articles, and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 19 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 300 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:03, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 May 2025

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Hithereppls (23:08, 1 May 2025)

[edit]

are you a bot? --Hithereppls (talk) 23:08, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

are you a bot or a real life human? Hithereppls (talk) 02:56, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
are you a bot or a real life human? Hithereppls (talk) 12:19, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This person is a real life human, however, the message at the top of this page has a note letting people know they are busy with exams until June. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 09:57, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 May 2025

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Abdul Lathiiph (20:38, 18 May 2025)

[edit]

I need a community profile of Changnaayili community in Saganrigu municipal --Abdul Lathiiph (talk) 20:38, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from This was difficult to make a username (17:10, 20 May 2025)

[edit]

How do I make an article? --This was difficult to make a username (talk) 17:10, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Shagil khan (18:55, 24 May 2025)

[edit]

hello i want create an article as a wikipedia editor can you please tell me how to create a draft of the said article --Shagil khan (talk) 18:55, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:~delta&oldid=1292017125"