Jump to content

User talk:Red Phoenix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Redphoenix526)


Invitation to participate in a research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

DC homebrew

[edit]

Following on from the List of Dreamcast homebrew games that was merged, I have just discovered another bad article Dreamcast homebrew and have nominated it to be deleted. Sceeegt (talk) 21:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 November newsletter

[edit]

The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion, Delaware BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place, Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are: Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points, Canada Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points, BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points, Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and Christmas Island AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

CheckUser changes

removed Maxim

Oversighter changes

removed Maxim

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

[edit]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

The copyvio was from this article. This diff is essentially a word-for-word copy of several paragraphs. See Earwig. C F A 💬 18:34, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redacted upon further review. Red Phoenix talk 22:50, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jio Star

[edit]

Need some help with this one. I see you deleted the talk page of this on the 14th. The page at Jio Star was moved to JioStar multiple times by SPA user Abdullateefsherani on the 14th. I moved it back to Jio Star since that is what it is commonly referred to in the sources. The SPA edit warred before it was returned to Jio Star and discussion was started on the 14th. I have been gone for a few days and since that time there have been multiple users who have attempted to move it back to JioStar, move it to STAR India Private Limited which is now a redirect and create other redirects. Almost seems like they coordinated confustion to get it moved to what they wanted. I am looking at the COI and SPI concerns now but is there a way to return it to the Jio Star page and undelete the talk page to continue the discussion? Looks like a rats nest with all of the moves they have done so unsure where to look to find the last stable version. CNMall41 (talk) 21:28, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page restored. I'm not entirely sure what happened; I thought I had seen multiple copies of this talk page and only deleted the one on the page I cleared per a G6 request for a page move. Reviewing the deletion log, I'm guessing Twinkle didn't work the way I intended it to. But I've got the deletion reversed and moved over to the talk page of the current article title, so it should be good to go from there. Red Phoenix talk 23:00, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. I think the SPAs were attempting to do a runaround and confuse everyone and I still can't figure out what happened. I did file this so hopefully it can untangle the mess they did as it reaches more than just Jio Star at this point. Cheers and thanks again!--CNMall41 (talk) 23:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2024).

Administrator changes

added
readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

added
readded Pppery

CheckUser changes

readded

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration


what should we do with am1 and am2 pages, they are basically defunct now?

[edit]

in a new interview, sega coo basically confirmed that the arcade divisions were closed:

[1]https://www.eurogamer.net/putting-the-mega-drive-back-into-sega-how-the-company-wants-to-return-to-creating-video-game-rock-roll-compared-to-nintendos-pop-music

Arcades, even now, technology-wise, they're not using the best technology anymore. Consumer hardware is more advanced, targeting the global market, with bigger budgets. You can spend more money and really appeal to a global audience, but with [Sega] targeting Japanese arcades, it didn't make sense because this market is shrinking too. So it's the law of diminishing returns. It's hard for developers to succeed in that kind of operation. So I just closed the dedicated arcade product development group, and merged them into the consumer development group.


Dop55 (talk) 06:24, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dop55: So if this is confirmation, and it kind of seems to be, then we simply treat them like a closed studio akin to how I've done that in Sega AM3 and mention that in 2024, the COO of Sega stated that the studios had been merged into the company's consumer development group, with source, of course. The pages don't need merged or deleted since there's a rich history with sources of each studio prior to now, that is still covered encyclopedically as it is. Red Phoenix talk 12:01, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page watcher) As an encyclopedia, we have many articles on subjects that are defunct. Our function is to preserve knowledge for posterity -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:14, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

[edit]
January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the 2025 WikiCup!

[edit]

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2025 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page.

For the 2025 WikiCup, we've implemented several changes to the scoring system. The highest-ranking contestants will now receive tournament points at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are now open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants will no longer be eliminated at the end of each round.

The first round will end on 26 February. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), Frostly (talk · contribs · email), Guerillero (talk · contribs · email) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Nuke feature also now provides links to the userpage of the user whose pages were deleted, and to the pages which were not selected for deletion, after page deletions are queued. This enables easier follow-up admin-actions.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Congratulations, Red Phoenix! The article you nominated, James Scott (boxer), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Rose

[edit]

Hey, I just added some sources to your Amy Rose draft, none of which were from Valnet sites. What do you think of my recent additions? I have at least a couple more sources to add soon too. I really would like this to get added to the mainspace, along with possibly Metal Sonic. MoonJet (talk) 21:07, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll look over it in the next few days when I have time. Admittedly I haven’t seen the third Sonic movie yet and I’m deliberately trying to avoid spoilers until I do. On getting it to main space, that’s going to need the opinion of editors of the project to change. The better this looks, the more likely it is, but generally the less that’s plot-based and the more about her development and critical reception is going to be what will do it. Red Phoenix talk 22:23, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, the main reason consensus was against her having an article back in the 2022 discussion was because the draft relied heavily on trivial mentions and Valnet sites. In my defense, standards for character articles weren't as defined back then like now. The current draft looks much more inline with the current standards. I would go bold and try to bring it to main space myself, but I'll likely be reverted, and be asked to open a new discussion. I'll wait a bit before opening up a discussion to try and gather a consensus For now, I'll add those other sources, and perhaps any other good ones I may find. I also plan to try and improve the other Sonic character articles. MoonJet (talk) 02:00, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2025).

Administrator changes

readded
removed Euryalus

CheckUser changes

removed

Oversighter changes

removed

Technical news

  • Administrators can now nuke pages created by a user or IP address from the last 90 days, up from the initial 30 days. T380846
  • A 'Recreated' tag will now be added to pages that were created with the same title as a page which was previously deleted and it can be used as a filter in Special:RecentChanges and Special:NewPages. T56145

Arbitration


WikiCup 2025 March newsletter

[edit]

The first round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As a reminder, we are no longer disqualifying the lowest-scoring contestants; everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned from Wikipedia. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receive tournament points at the end of each round. Unlike the round points in the main WikiCup table, which are reset at the end of each round, tournament points are carried over between rounds and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far.

Round 1 was very competitive compared with previous years; two contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 500 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 18 featured articles, 26 featured lists, 1 featured-topic article, 197 good articles, 38 good-topic articles and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 23 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 550 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2, which begins on 1 March. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2025).

Administrator changes

removed

CheckUser changes

removed

Oversighter changes

removed AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A new filter has been added to the Special:Nuke tool, which allows administrators to filter for pages in a range of page sizes (in bytes). This allows, for example, deleting pages only of a certain size or below. T378488
  • Non-administrators can now check which pages are able to be deleted using the Special:Nuke tool. T376378

Miscellaneous


Administrators' newsletter – April 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2025).

Administrator changes

added
readded Dennis Brown
removed

Bureaucrat changes

added Barkeep49

CheckUser changes

added 0xDeadbeef

Oversighter changes

removed GB fan
readded Moneytrees

Miscellaneous


Application of your due weight essay

[edit]

Hello. I've found your essay on due weight as a measure of appropriate coverage to be useful. In light of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/LaundryPizza03 and its discussion on whether the editor has enough content creation experience to warrant adminship (and others finding that to be a non-issue even if they oppose on other grounds), I've been thinking about what sort of things I could create (I have no current plans or need to run for adminship, but I don't want to close off that possibility forever). My concern is that, with nearly 7 million articles as of me writing this, I don't know what can be created without resorting to puffery. I suppose there are some subjects that have articles on non-English Wikipedias that I could create something for English Wikipedia, but I don't want to write something, have it on the front page, and confuse people as to why this is a thing that Wikipedia is writing about. I've discussed this sort of concern at Talk:When a man argues against two beautiful ladies like this, they are going to have the last word#Articleworthiness?, in which I cited your essay. If this doesn't interest you or feel worthy of your time, then feel free to disregard this. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 01:25, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Brainulator9, let me answer your concern by sharing another personal philosophy of mine: there is nothing special about being the person who presses the "Create Article" button. My list of FAs and GAs is on my user page, and of those, only Supreme Warrior is one I actually created. I've recreated articles from redirects such as Crush 40, Sega Technical Institute, United Game Artists, and Hardlight, but overwhelmingly my contributions were on articles that were already started. You mentioned 7 million articles on Wikipedia; that's nearly 7 million opportunities to improve articles. You can fundamentally rewrite poorly written articles. You can contribute the research to an under sourced article to make it better. You can copyedit articles with random sources that can be better aligned into an article. And those you can take to GA or FA, or DYK and end up on the main page, for subjects that do deserve articles.
Long story short: don't confuse article creation with content creation. I actually think it's better to take articles that already exist and make them better. There's a much better selection of articles that do deserve to exist there that just don't in a quality form, and there's tremendous opportunity in whatever subject field you have a passion for. Red Phoenix talk 16:43, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! Earth Day Edit-a-thon & Meetup 2025

[edit]
Upcoming Indianapolis event - April 22: Earth Day edit-a-thon and meetup 2025

You are invited to join us at Ujamaa Community Bookstore (2424 Doctor M.L.K. Jr St, Indianapolis, IN 46208)for an Earth Day edit-a-thon and meetup hosted by IU Indianapolis Arts & Humanities Institute, Ujamaa Community Bookstore, Flanner Farms, and the Wikimedians of Indiana User Group. This event is supported by the Central Indiana Community Foundation—where both experienced and new Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve write articles about earth day, the environment, and local food and environmental movements, history, and legislation.

  • Tuesday April 22nd, from 4 - 7 pm: Earth Day Edit-a-thon & Meetup (RSVP), focusing on Earth Day related topics like the environment, agriculture, plants, and animals, and local and regional food and environmental movements, history and legislationg
4 pm to 7pm at Ujamaa Community Bookstore in Indianapolis, IN.

We hope to see you there! Sincerely, Wikimedians in Indiana User Group

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Indiana-area events by removing your name from this list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:44, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol May 2025 Backlog drive

[edit]
May 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 May 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Pages Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:26, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2025 May newsletter

[edit]

The second round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 28 April at 23:59 UTC. To reiterate what we said in the previous newsletter, we are no longer disqualifying contestants based on how many points (now known as round points) they received. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receive tournament points at the end of each round. These tournament points are carried over between rounds, and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers at the end of each round. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned.

Round 2 was quite competitive. Four contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and eight scored more than 500 points (including one who has withdrawn). The following competitors scored at least 800 points:

In addition, we would like to recognize Generalissima (submissions) for her efforts; she scored 801 round points but withdrew before the end of the round.

The full scores for round 2 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 13 featured articles, 20 featured lists, 4 featured-topic articles, 138 good articles, 7 good-topic articles, and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 19 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 300 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:03, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2025

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2025).

Administrator changes

added Rusalkii
readded NaomiAmethyst (overlooked last month)
removed

Interface administrator changes

removed Galobtter

Guideline and policy news

Miscellaneous