Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Paranormal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject
Paranormal
General information
Main project page talk
Participants talk
Project banner talk
Project category talk
Departments
Assessment talk
Collaboration talk
Newsletter talk
Peer review talk

Welcome to WikiProject Paranormal, a WikiProject that aims to provide a framework for the improvement and organization of articles related to the paranormal, anomalous phenomena and other similar areas. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask us on our discussion page.

Anyone is welcome to join by listing their username on the /Participants page and contributing to the project. Make sure to put our discussion page to your watchlist so you're notified of new discussions. Watchlisting Wikipedia:WikiProject Paranormal/Article alerts and Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Paranormal is also strongly recommended.

Goals

[edit]
  1. To provide a concise and accurate record of notable beliefs, organizations, experiments, individuals and events which are associated with the paranormal, including their history, background and their current status.
  2. To provide a framework (including infoboxes, categories, and examples of Best Practice) from within which scholarly entries about the paranormal, and related topics, may be produced.
  3. To provide a scholarly set of terminology to describe the paranormal which is technically, culturally, and contextually accurate.
  4. To seek out and apply verifiable mainstream sources to pages within the projects scope with the aim of A) addressing any issues of verifiability and reliability that have been highlighted in existing entries, and B) ensuring that new entries are of sufficient quality that their verifiability and reliability do not become an issue.
  5. To ensure that each entry approaches its topic from a balanced and neutral perspective.
  6. To ensure that the notability of each topic can be gleaned from its entry, without the need for additional explanation.
  7. To ensure that a clear dividing line is established between reporting the belief in/background of the topic in a scholarly manner, and advocating/denouncing the topic itself.
  8. To expand project stubs to full entries and to progress full entries to the next level.
  9. Patrol frequently vandalized pages within the project's scope.

Scope

[edit]

Subjects covered by this project include (but are not necessarily limited to):

The beginnings of a list of topics which are covered in reference books directly related to this topic can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Paranormal/Encyclopedic articles.

Categories

[edit]
High-level article categories
Stub categories

Recognized content

[edit]

The following articles fall within the scope of the project and have been noted for their outstanding quality. Project members are encouraged use them as examples of good practice and to note their different writing and organizational styles.

Full list: Wikipedia:WikiProject Paranormal/Recognized content
[edit]
[edit]

Good articles

[edit]
[edit]

Good article nominees

[edit]

Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team release version selections

[edit]

To-do

[edit]

Article alerts

[edit]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Paranormal/Article alerts:

Articles for deletion

Good article nominees

Deletion sorting

[edit]
Click "[show]" to expand

Paranormal deletion

[edit]
Ghosthunting.dk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This entire unreferenced article appears to be mostly promotional in tone. Interestingly, the article seems to say that it has significant coverage in the Danish media, but zero examples of this supposed coverage are actually cited. -Samoht27 (talk) 23:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. From a quick google search of "ghosthunting.dk" I find no sources worth considering, ignoring the Danish articles that I can't read. guninvalid (talk) 23:50, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Kozyrev mirror (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Alerted to the article by WP:FTN. Apparently already deleted from Russian WP for lack of reliable sources, the sources being used in this article seem similarly unreliable. Maybe we could have a section in tinfoil hat or something? Maybe? Color me dubious. jps (talk) 18:29, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge into Nikolai Aleksandrovich Kozyrev. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:33, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: Previous !votes on the last AfD in favor of keeping this article claimed that there were sources discoverable, but the reliability of those sources are questionable. Just because a source exists is not enough. Reliability is paramount when it comes for WP:FRINGE subjects. jps (talk) 18:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    If there are still questionable sources in the article, they should be tagged? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:41, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I think all of the sources are questionable? That is why there is a tag at the top. jps (talk) 18:45, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    That tag says "Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable." So not exactly in line with your view. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Is there a better tag for "All of this article's listed sources may not be reliable"? jps (talk) 19:07, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    For the removal of any doubt, it might be better to just tag them all individually? I'm not aware that's prohibited. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
     Done jps (talk) 21:06, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete It's been almost two years. If reliable sources were out there, they would have been found by now. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 18:42, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and redirect to Nikolai Aleksandrovich Kozyrev#Kozyrev mirror. Even the WP:FRIND sources I could find [1] only give it a passing mention, and that's not enough to construct a stand-alone article. - LuckyLouie (talk) 19:07, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge into Nikolai Aleksandrovich Kozyrev.Halbared (talk) 19:14, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and redirect to Nikolai Aleksandrovich Kozyrev#Kozyrev mirror as suggested above, while merging no content. Material that is supported only by unreliable sources is not compliant with policy, and so preserving it by a merge would be against policy. XOR'easter (talk) 20:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - No reliable sources. The section it is proposed to redirect to seems to have the same problem. Brunton (talk) 08:32, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Does not belong in Nikolai Aleksandrovich Kozyrev either because of WP:ONEWAY. If I invent something that is based on nonsense, then claim it is based on Einstein's theories and call it "Einstein perpetual motion machine", it does not belong in the Einstein article. Another reason why it does not belong there is that the sources do not become better just because they are in another article. --Hob Gadling (talk) 09:18, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Do you deny that such an entity was ever constructed, whatever nonsense it was based on? What should be included at Nikolai Aleksandrovich Kozyrev is a separate debate, of course. I was unaware of the "Einstein perpetual motion machine". Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:23, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    No, I do not deny it; I have no idea whether it was constructed. There is no connection between existence and relevance for Wikipedia articles, so I do not see the relevance of the question.
    What should be included at Nikolai Aleksandrovich Kozyrev is a separate debate If the result is "merge", there needs to be content to be merged. If all the content of the current article is unuseable anywhere, there is no point to merging it, so it is not a separate debate.
    And it is no wonder that you were unaware of something I invented on the spot for the purpose of reasoning on this page. --Hob Gadling (talk) 12:23, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not sure how something you have invented is a valid argument. It looks a little like a straw man. There is already material about this subject at Nikolai Aleksandrovich Kozyrev, so I think it's perfectly fair that a separate discussion takes place about that at its Talk page. I am not trying to argue that the mere existence of anything justifies it having its own Wikipedia article. I'm trying to suggest that in this particular case some readers will want to know what a Kozyrev mirror is/was and why it might be described as "pseudoscience". Few people believe in the tarot, but we still have an article about it. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:19, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    It's not a straw man, it's an analogy or an example. Most of the time, examples help people understand a concept, but I guess it did not help you but instead confused you a real lot. The concept I wanted you to understand is that per WP:ONEWAY, any material about a crazy thing named after a famous or notable person by some random non-famous and non-notable person does not belong in the article about that famous person. The K-mirror material that is already in the K article does not belong there either for the same reason. (Yes, I know, this is not the place to talk about material in the K article, but since it is used as a reason for including even more such material by merging, I need to mention it.)
    some readers will want to know is weak reasoning that overrides neither the lack of reliable sources nor ONEWAY or the rest of WP:FRINGE. --Hob Gadling (talk) 07:42, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for your clarification of the analogy. Yes, I understand WP:ONEWAY, but if a crazy thing is widely known about, but has no association with the person after whom it's been named, I still it think it's useful for people to be told. A slight limitation in your analogy might be the relative fame of Einstein and Kozyrev. Additionally, yes, "some readers will want to know" may be weak reasoning, but "nobody will ever want to know" seems equally flawed. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:31, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Nikolai Aleksandrovich Kozyrev#Kozyrev mirror. Not a lot here. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:08, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Membership

[edit]

To join, sign your name at the /Participants page and add the main page to your watchlist. Members can add the following userboxes to identify themselves as members of the project. A list of members with these userboxes is available at Category:WikiProject Paranormal participants.

Wikitext userbox where used
{{User WikiProject Paranormal}} linked pages
{{User WikiProject Paranormal alt}}
This user is a member of WikiProject Paranormal.
linked pages
Other
Wikitext userbox where used
{{User Paranormal2}}
This user is a member of WikiProject Paranormal, which is dedicated to improving articles on paranormal subjects.
linked pages
{{User Paranormal3}}
This user is a member of WikiProject Paranormal, a project dedicated to improving articles on paranormal subjects.
linked pages
{{User Paranormal4}}
This user is a member of WikiProject Paranormal, a project dedicated to improving articles on paranormal subjects.
linked pages
{{user paranormal}}
This user thinks you're watching them. Watch other paranormal activity at WikiProject Paranormal.
linked pages

Templates

[edit]

Stub templates

[edit]

Boilerplate templates

[edit]
Feel free to use these templates where appropriate. Any major changes should be brought up on the template talk page.
{{WikiProject Paranormal}}
WikiProject iconParanormal Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
{{WikiProject Paranormal user}}
{{blackproject}} - Notice placed on talk pages of articles that discuss black projects — "highly classified military/defense projects, unacknowledged publicly by the government, military personnel, or defense contractors"

Infoboxes templates

[edit]

Barnstar

[edit]

{{The Paranormal Barnstar}}

The Paranormal Barnstar
The Paranormal Barnstar, awarded to users who have made a notable contribution to the project

{{WikiProject Paranormal Barnstar}}

The Paranormal Barnstar
The Project Paranormal Barnstar, awarded to users who have made a notable contribution to the project

See also

[edit]
[edit]

Tools

[edit]
  • Cat scan - view recent changes to all articles in a given Category.
  • Duesentrieb's category tree - enhanced Category viewing, easily see parents and subcategories of a Category and the articles in them.