Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Politics

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Politics and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48: 30 days

Welcome to the talk space of WikiProject Politics. In this area you can find discussions, notices, requests of many articles that in some way deals with the practice of politics. If you would like to discuss, place a notice about, or if you have a request about, an article within the scope of this project, please do include it here. If you have an interest in politics and would like to contribute, please add your name to the list of participants on the project page.

WikiProject Politics

Main page	+ Talk
Portal	Talk
Help	Talk
To-do list	Talk
Recognized content	Talk

Departments
Assessment	Talk
→ Requests	Talk
Collaboration	Talk
Peer review	Talk

Project organization
Article alerts	Talk
Participants	Talk
Deletion sorting
Stubs	Talk
New articles	Talk
Project banner	Talk
Project category	Talk
Unreferenced BLPs	Talk

Task forces
American politics	Talk
Gun politics	Talk
Political parties	Talk

Related projects
Australian politics	Talk
Capitalism	Talk
Chinese politics	Talk
Conservatism	Talk
European Union	Talk
Libertarianism	Talk
Law	Talk
Socialism	Talk
Voting Systems	Talk
Elections and Referendums$	Talk
Indian politics	Talk
New Zealand politics
Pakistani politics
UK politics	Talk
UK Parliament constituencies
US Congress
U.S. Supreme Court Cases
U.S. Government
U.S. presidential elections

view · edit · changes

2025 May Day protests

Collaboration welcome at newly-created 2025 May Day protests. Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:23, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - will repost at WP: WikiProject Organized Labour. Happy May Day! Goldsztajn (talk) 22:31, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for English Reformation

English Reformation has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 06:05, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Marcus Bryant#Requested move 4 May 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Marcus Bryant#Requested move 4 May 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 02:49, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Matthias Koehl#Requested move 28 April 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Matthias Koehl#Requested move 28 April 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 08:25, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Spanish American wars of independence

Spanish American wars of independence has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:39, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Nancy Pelosi

Nancy Pelosi has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:17, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:The Base (hate group)#Requested move 7 May 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:The Base (hate group)#Requested move 7 May 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 15:31, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NPOL and ROUTINE

Please consider offering feedback in the discussion Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Possible issue with standard interpretation of NPOL, as I believe it is an opportunity to more fully address potential conflicts over notability determinations for failed candidates. ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:45, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Tiberius

Tiberius has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 19:01, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Non-constituency Member of Parliament

Non-constituency Member of Parliament has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:54, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Save Our Children

Save Our Children has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:00, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trump has an RfC

Donald Trump has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Emiya1980 (talk) 21:27, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ALDE as a "transnational alliance"

Hi everyone,

I would like some community feedback on the continued relevance of the article on Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe as a transnational political alliance -- note that this is different from the article on ALDE as a European political party or as a political group of the European Parliament, or as a political group of PACE, or in the Committee of the Regions.

The page is not really developed and has not changed much in a while. Meanwhile, I am not really sure that this "alliance" between ALDE Party and the EDP is still a thing, and the EDP's website does not seem to mention it at all. The number of seats in the EP is also wrong and the website is actually that of ALDE Party. At the very least, if we are to keep this page, it should probably be in the past tense. What do you think? Julius Schwarz (talk) 08:28, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Flavian dynasty

Flavian dynasty has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:53, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]