1996 Spanish government formation
![]() José María Aznar and Jordi Pujol on 2 July 1996, during their first institutional meeting following the former's investiture. | |
Date | 4 March – 4 May 1996 (2 months) |
---|---|
Location | Spain |
Cause | Hung parliament following the 1996 Spanish general election |
Participants | |
Outcome |
|
Attempts to form a government in Spain followed the Spanish general election of 3 March 1996, which failed to deliver an overall majority for any political party. As a result, the previous cabinet headed by Felipe González was forced to remain in a caretaker capacity for 62 days until the next government could be sworn in.
The election failed to provide a majority for either the People's Party (PP) or a prospective left-wing bloc comprising the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE) and United Left (IU). As a result, regionalist and nationalist political forces such as Convergence and Union (CiU), the Basque Nationalist Party (PNV) and Canarian Coalition (CC) were left as kingmakers in negotiations. The PSOE's electoral overperformance compared to expectations had triggered speculation on whether incumbent prime minister Felipe González would be able to cling on to government instead of PP leader José María Aznar, an hypothesis that the former tried to cast off as he let the party with the most seats make its attempt at investiture, without ruling out "other possibilities" in the event of a failure.
After weeks of negotiations, the PP was able to reach confidence and supply agreements with CiU, the PNV and CC, ensuring Aznar's election as prime minister of a minority cabinet on 4 May 1996 and ending almost 14 years of uninterrupted Socialist governments under González. Aznar's agreement with CiU leader and president of the Government of Catalonia Jordi Pujol came to be known as the "Majestic Pact",[a] under which Aznar agreed to the development of regional financing—which had already started during González's tenure—in addition to the transfer of new powers to Catalonia in various matters. The significance of such accord came to endure the 1996–2000 period, with critics blaming it for starting political dynamics that culminated in the 2017–2018 Spanish constitutional crisis.
Legal provisions
[edit]The procedure for government formation in Spain was outlined in Article 99 of the 1978 Constitution:
1. After renewal of the Congress of Deputies, and in other cases provided under the Constitution, the King, after consultation with the representatives appointed by the political groups with Parliamentary representation, and through the Speaker of Congress, shall nominate a candidate for President of the Government.
2. The candidate nominate [sic][b] in accordance with the provisions of the foregoing paragraph shall submit to the Congress of Deputies the political programme of the Government that he intends to form and shall seek the confidence of the Houses.
3. If the Congress of Deputies, by vote of the absolute majority of its members, invests said candidate with its confidence, the King shall appoint him President. If an absolute majority is not obtained, the same proposal shall be submitted for a new vote forty-eight hours after the previous vote, and it shall be considered that confidence has been secured if it passes by a simple majority.
4. If, after this vote, confidence for the investiture has not been obtained, successive proposals shall be voted upon in the manner provided in the foregoing paragraphs.
5. If within two months after the first vote for investiture no candidate has obtained the confidence of Congress, the King shall dissolve Congress and call new elections, following endorsement by the Speaker of Congress.— Article 99 of the Spanish Constitution.[3]
Post-election developments
[edit]Initial positions
[edit]
Ahead of the 1996 Spanish general election, the People's Party (PP) under José María Aznar had hoped to secure a "sufficient majority" of seats in the Congress of Deputies: a parliamentary plurality close enough an absolute majority—set at 176 seats—to be able to govern alone.[4][5] The election, however, saw an unexpectedly close result as the PP underperformed opinion poll expectations, falling 20 seats short of an overall majority in the Congress and leading the ruling Spanish Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE) of Prime Minister Felipe González by barely 1.2 percentage points and 15 seats, the smallest victory of a party in a Spanish election up to that point since the country's transition to democracy.[6] This left the peripheral nationalist Convergence and Union (CiU) and the Basque Nationalist Party (PNV)—both of which had been very critical of the PP's perceived centralist platform during the electoral campaign[7][8]—as the likely kingmakers together with Canarian Coalition (CC), which had offered to support the party coming out on top if it supported its "non-negotiable" proposals for the Canary Islands.[9]
The discussed outcomes in light of the election results were:[10]
- An alliance of the PP, CC and Valencian Union (UV)—parties with which the PP was allied at the regional level—with CiU, comprising 177 seats (and an hypothetical total of 182 seats if the PNV was included).
- An unlikely alliance of PSOE with CiU, PNV and Basque Solidarity (EA), which would add up to only 163 seats. Adding United Left (IU) to the bloc would raise the number to 184 seats, but such an agreement was deemed as impractical due to the ideological and personal animosities between IU's leader, Julio Anguita, and both González and CiU.
- A PP–IU agreement, which would command 177 seats, was deemed as unnatural despite both parties' collaboration during the previous parliamentary term and their common opposition to González's government.
- Parliamentary deadlock lasting for two months from a first failed investiture ballot, leading to a new general election to be held at some point throughout 1996.
In his election night speech, Aznar offered to "reach out" to other parties if he was granted the responsibility of forming a government; González conceded the election saying that he would propose to King Juan Carlos I that the party with the most seats be offered the chance to govern but that, if this failed, "other possibilities would open up"; whereas CiU leader and president of the Government of Catalonia, Jordi Pujol, argued that it was Aznar's turn to "move his pieces" but that he would "stand up" to the PP, hinting at difficult negotiations; PNV leaders Xabier Arzalluz and Iñaki Anasagasti demanded the PP to act "with a different approach" going forward,[11] but argued that the results allowed their party to "intervene in Spain".[12] Because of the diverging positions, the government formation process was widely expected to be lengthier than the one in 1993, which lasted for 33 days.[13] The political differences between the PP and CiU were made evident during the celebration of the former's victory at its headquarters on election night, with party supporters chanting "Pujol, dwarf, speak Spanish" (Spanish: Pujol, enano, habla castellano) to an uncomfortable Aznar,[14][15] who in ensuing years would minimize them as being "in a joking tone" because people were "especially happy".[16]
CiU as kingmaker
[edit]
The parties' starting positions made clear that CiU's role was decisive. CiU announced that they would likely abstain or vote against Aznar's first investiture ballot, hoping that other parties such as the PSOE and the PNV would follow suit in order to allow the formation of a new government.[17] On the PSOE side, González claimed that, while he did not contemplate the hypothesis of forming a government and would ensure an "orderly and responsible" transfer of power as interim prime minister, his party would vote against Aznar in any prospective investiture,[18][19] whereas Public Works minister Josep Borrell called for CiU to not allow Aznar's election on the basis that electoral results in Catalonia had shown "a general and clear rejection of a PP government".[20] CC leader and president of the Canary Islands, Manuel Hermoso, offered to both CiU and the PNV to agree on minimum conditions to negotiate as a bloc any support to a future PP government.[21] The Galician Nationalist Bloc (BNG), which had entered parliament for the first time, proposed an alliance between the PSOE and Catalan, Basque and Galician nationalist parties in the event that Aznar failed in his efforts.[22] A citizen initiative issued a manifesto on 5 March, "We do not resign ourselves" (Spanish: No nos resignamos), claiming that voters had given 2.5 million more votes to parties to the left-of-centre than to the PP and its prospective nationalist allies and calling for PSOE, IU and other left-wing nationalist parties to set aside their political differences and try to form a government.[23] The PNV was willing to enter negotiations with the PP, provided that the latter changed its policy of rejecting the reintegration of terrorist group ETA prisoners.[24]
The PP acknowledged that the only way to prevent a new election was to court Pujol's party,[25] as parliamentary arithmetics meant that no government was possible without CiU at least consenting to it.[26] At first, a successful Aznar's investiture in the first ballot was considered as unlikely due to the existing tensions between PP and CiU and the impossibility of reaching the 176-mark of an absolute majority without the latter, whereas a simple majority in the second ballot would require a way to circumvent the likely opposition from the left-of-centre parties, which added up to 166 seats as opposed to the 161 that a PP–CC–UV bloc could muster.[26] As a result, Aznar's party set out a strategy to attract CiU, PNV and CC to a government,[27] with an offer to CiU to negotiate a new concept of the income tax that would give autonomous communities the capacity to legislate and collect it.[28] CiU, in turn, considered proposing a bilateral "fiscal agreement".[29] These approaches raised concerns among PP's regionalist allies, UV and the Aragonese Party (PAR), who were hostile to some of CiU's positions and worried about an excessive decentralization that favoured Catalonia in detriment of their own regions.[30] On 12 and 13 March, Aznar met with González and Anguita to inform them of his immediate plans and the framework of the agreements he was attempting with CiU, PNV and CC.[31]
On 15 March, González encouraged Aznar to fully commit to an agreement with CiU that guaranteed Spain's governability—stating that "a government formed around the People's Party" would, in his opinion, be "the most reasonable way to respond to the wishes expressed by the public at the polls"—but also reminded him of the limits established by the Constitution for the process of power transfers to the autonomous communities, set in the "maintenance of territorial and social cohesion".[32] Following a secret meeting between Aznar and Pujol on 17 March, the first between the two leaders since the election (in which the PP leader delivered a basic negotiation document to the Catalan president comprising five points: economic policy, European convergence, social policies, regional development and anti-terrorism policy), González predicted that a prospective Aznar government would prove "unable to make decisions" and would "give the majority" back to the PSOE in a snap election.[33]
Congress bureau election
[edit]
The first negotiating test was the election of the bureau of the Congress of Deputies once the chamber reconvened on 27 March, and particularly the election of the post of president. The PNV claimed that this post should be given to a member of the opposition parties, citing the recent precedent in Catalonia following the 1995 regional election in which a member of the opposition Socialists' Party of Catalonia (PSC) was elected as the chamber's speaker; an agreement between the PSOE, IU and some of the peripheral nationalist parties would secure enough support to prevent the PP from controlling this post.[34][35] CC joined the PNV's call and claimed in the days following the general election that the Congress' presidency should be given to CiU—even bringing forward the name of Josep López de Lerma, who had been third Congress vice president during the 1993–1996 term—but the latter replied that it was premature to talk about agreements and even less so about names.[27]
On 20 March, PP and CiU reached an agreement together with PNV and CC for the composition of both bureaus in the Cortes Generales in which the latter renounced the post of Congress speaker in favour of PP's Federico Trillo; in exchange, the Congress bureau would have a plural composition with both CiU and the PNV securing a vice presidency and a secretary post, respectively, in addition to PP commitments to reduce the peripheral State Administration to a minimum, address its structural reform as part of the development of the single administration and study the possibility of initiating the delegation of exclusive state powers to the autonomous communities.[36][37] However, CiU rejected Aznar's offer to enter into a coalition government and stated that any negotiation aimed at reaching a governability pact could not extend beyond 24 or 25 April.[38]
Election of the President of the Congress of Deputies | |||||
Ballot → | 27 March 1996 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Required majority → | 176 out of 350 | ||||
Federico Trillo (PP) | 179 / 350
|
![]() | |||
Jordi Solé Tura (PSC) | 160 / 350
|
![]() | |||
Enrique Fernández-Miranda (PP) | 1 / 350
|
![]() | |||
Blank ballots | 7 / 350
| ||||
Invalid ballots | 1 / 350
| ||||
Absentees | 0 / 350
| ||||
Sources[39] |
Trillo was elected in the first round of voting with support from the PP, CiU, PNV, CC and UV (a total of 179 votes), whereas the PSOE candidate, former Culture minister Jordi Solé Tura, received 160 votes from PSOE and IU, which had reached an agreement to ensure the latter's presence in the bureau; Enrique Fernández-Miranda, who was slated as PP's candidate for the post of first vice president, received one vote.[40] This voting pattern was repeated for the remaining bureau posts, with the PSOE electing two vice presidents, the PP and CiU electing one each, and PP, PSOE, IU and PNV each electing one secretary.[41] The result was considered a success for Aznar, who went on to claim after the votes that "some who still had doubts that the PP had won the election will have them removed after today".[42]
The next day, Aznar described Trillo's election as Congress speaker as "the first expression of political change", while emphasizing that none of the demands put on the negotiating table by the Catalan, Basque or Canarian nationalists undermined Spain's territorial solidarity.[43] That same day, CiU spokesperson in Congress, Joaquim Molins, had stated that CiU had to support Aznar's investiture if it wanted "to be a key actor in Madrid".[44] On 31 March, following a new secret meeting between both leaders, Pujol demanded Aznar to acknowledge the "Catalan differential fact" in his investiture speech as an essential condition for CiU to support the formation of a PP government.[45][46]
Candidate José María Aznar (PP)
[edit]Nomination and negotiations
[edit]Following the bureau election, the King summoned the various political parties with parliamentary representation[c] in the Congress to hold a round of talks from 2 to 12 April, a long period which came as a result of the Holy Week holidays on 3–8 April.[47][48][49] The day previous to the start of the talks, the spokespersons of PP and CC, Rodrigo Rato and José Carlos Mauricio, announced that both parties had reached an agreement under which the latter would support Aznar's investiture and provide his government with confidence and supply in exchange for regional concessions, such as a reform of the Statute of Autonomy of the Canary Islands, a permanent status for the islands within the European Union and an improvement of the region's economic and fiscal regime.[50] CiU and PNV did not clarify what their stance would be in any future investiture.[51] On the last day of the talks, the King chose to nominate Aznar as candidate to try to form a government,[52] who hoped to be able to do so by the last week of April.[53]
Formal negotiations between the PP and CiU had been ongoing since 1 April.[54] These were initially characterized by slow but continuous progress: by 13 April, both parties had reached an agreement in principle to share the management of shared taxes by the Spanish Tax Agency in Catalonia, which would initially affect income tax but was also expected to extend to the value-added tax;[55] by 16 April, a compromise was reached to abolish the compulsory military service and professionalize the Spanish Armed Forces.[56] However, negotiations stalled on 18 April as Pujol claimed that Aznar's proposals did not "satisfy" CiU's aspirations, particularly on the abolition of civil governors and power transfers on traffic and their police control.[54]
Both leaders met two days later to unblock negotiations, but their differing interpretations of the meeting outcome—with Aznar claiming that the investiture agreement had been practically "finalized" with only a few economic details remaining, whereas Pujol noted that "some progress had been made" but there were still "significant discrepancies" that needed to be studied[57]—led to a new impasse on 22 April, as Pujol acknowledged that the meeting "had not gone well". CiU drifted towards not supporting Aznar's investiture, even if it meant risking a repeat election taking place, because of severe differences on the negotiating positions and a perception that the PP was not willing to fulfill its commitments on matters affecting regional financing and power transfers.[58] Both parties agreed that a final decision on whether CiU would be willing to support Aznar's investiture would have to be given by the end of the week.[59]
The "Majestic Pact"
[edit]A seven-hour meeting between the PP and CiU delegations on 24 April managed to solve the conflicting points and advance the negotiations,[54] but the tight schedule meant that an investiture by 29–30 April was unfeasible.[60] By the next day, an overall understanding was said to have been reached, with both parties starting to put the final political agreement into writing.[61] The final document included all key demands of CiU, namely: transfer of 30% of the personal income tax base with regards to financing, participation of the automous communities in a territorial tax agency shared with the State to manage personal income tax and wealth tax, transfer of traffic powers to the Government of Catalonia and of port management powers to the autonomous communities and abolition of compulsory military service, as well a political agreement for the PP to support the language normalization policy affecting the Catalan.[62]
The PP–CiU agreement would be sealed with a summit dinner between the leaders of both parties in the Majestic Hotel of Barcelona;[62][63] as a result, the name of "Majestic Pact" (Spanish: Pacto del Majestic) would be coined to refer to this alliance.[1][64] It would comprise not just an investiture agreement, but a confidence and supply accord for the entire legislature; CiU members revealed that the PSOE's rejection to allow Aznar's investiture through an abstention, which was their initial proposal, forced Pujol's party into entering negotiations for a stable alliance with the PP in order to prevent a repeat election from taking place.[65]
While the agreements with CiU and CC virtually ensured Aznar's investiture in the first ballot with 176 votes, the PP wanted to reach a deal with the PNV—with whom negotiations had been developed in parallel with those of CiU—in order to rely on a broad majority to govern.[66] By 29 April, negotiations on the Basque Economic Agreement, continuing professional training, the return of PNV's historical heritage and a PP's commitment to negotiate the full development of the Basque Statute of Autonomy during the legislature ended with a deal being closed between both parties, which also included some of the demands agreed between PP and CiU such as abolition of civil governors and decentralization of active employment policies and ports.[67][68] PNV president Xabier Arzalluz praised Aznar for reaching a pact that the PSOE "was not able" to make in the previous legislative term,[69] even commenting that he had "achieved more in 14 days with Aznar than in 13 years with Felipe González".[70]
Investiture attempt
[edit]José María Aznar's investiture debate was scheduled to start at 11:30 CEST (UTC+2) on 3 May with Aznar's speech, to be followed by responses from all other parties and a first round of voting on 4 May.[71][72] A second round of voting, which was ultimately not required, would have taken place on 6 May.
In a conciliatory speech, Aznar defended his agreements with CiU, PNV and CC as "transparent", key for ensuring a long term and central in pursuing a program "of centre": a drive for autonomy with a reform of the regional financing system that did not affect inter-territorial solidarity; an economic drive and convergence with Europe; and a commitment to maintain the "solidarity pact" of universal health care, education, pension benefits and social protection.[73][74][75] Aznar also softened his pre-election pledge of lowering taxes, instead committing himself to a generic reform of the income tax.[76] During the debate, González demanded more information to understand the scope of the PP's agreements with the nationalist parties—particularly on the issue of regional financing—but he chose not to be belligerent and deliberately avoided critizicing Aznar for these agreements while promising "a calm opposition" that did not lose its composure and avoided tensions.[77] IU's Anguita defended his party's role as "sole opposition" after accusing both PP and PSOE of "being the same thing", "defending the same values and applying the same policies" together with CiU and PNV, while denouncing an alleged "pact of silence" between the two major parties around the GAL, reserved funds and other corruption scandals that had plagued the tenure of the fourth González government.[78][79]

CiU spokesperson Molins defended the regional financing agreement reached with the PP in that the inter-territorial solidarity mechanisms in force in Spain "caused a distortion" by allowing regions that contributed above average to the public treasury (such as Catalonia) to receive below-average funding for the services they provide, whereas regions with a lower level of development and a lesser contribution received above-average funding.[80] The PNV pledged itself to ensure that Aznar's next government completed its term after the prime ministerial candidate had promised to fulfill the development of the Basque Statute, which had been the party's main demand during negotiations.[81] Pilar Rahola, from ERC, accused CiU of "committing electoral fraud by voting for Aznar", reminding them of their campaign pledge not to allow Aznar's investiture and ridiculing the Majestic agreement.[82] The BNG representative, Francisco Rodríguez, accused Aznar of not addressing Galicia's problems—a region ruled by the PP—whereas UV spokesperson José María Chiquillo announced his abstention in the investiture due to a lack of response from the PP to his party's initiatives proposed during negotiations.[83]
Investiture José María Aznar (PP) | ||
Ballot → | 4 May 1996 | |
---|---|---|
Required majority → | 176 out of 350 ![]() | |
181 / 350
| ||
166 / 350
| ||
Abstentions
|
1 / 350
| |
Absentees
|
2 / 350
| |
Sources[84][85] |
Without surprises, Aznar was elected by an absolute majority in the first ballot on 4 May, being supported by 181 deputies—from PP, CiU, PNV and CC—and opposed by PSOE, IU, BNG, ERC and EA for a total 166 votes against, with UV's single deputy abstaining.[85]
Aftermath
[edit]Government stability
[edit]
The 62-day stalemate in 1996 between a general election and a successful investiture marked the longest government formation period in Spain until that time, to be surpassed only in 2015–2016 (at 314 days).[86][87][88] Aznar's election as prime minister ended nearly 14 years of uninterrupted Socialist governments under González, and allowed the PP to form its first-ever national cabinet.[89][90][91]
The resulting alliances provided the PP government of stability throughout the entire 1996–2000 period, despite its status as a minority government. While there were occasional disagreements—such as the one in late 1997 due to negotiations to outline a new method for healthcare financing[92][93][94]—PP and CiU maintained their good relations and renewed their accords ahead of the passing of the 1997,[95][96] 1998,[97] 1999,[98][99] and 2000 budget laws.[100] In January 1998, both parties explicitly committed themselves to ensuring stability until 2000.[101]
The relationship between PP and PNV remained more tense due to increasing political and ideological differences: in September 1996, Lehendakari José Antonio Ardanza warned Aznar that the PNV's commitment was to support his investiture and that he should not take the Basque party's support to parliamentary initiatives—such as budgets—for granted.[102] In March 1997, Aznar agreed to freeze the Basque Country's contribution to the general expenses of the State within the framework of the Basque Economic Agreement (despite the Ministry of Economy's intent to raise the quota), but warned the PNV that it was a concession that exceeded the investiture agreements.[103] However, despite increasing tensions—which also saw the PNV expelling the PP from the government of Bilbao, the main local coalition government between both parties, in December 1997[104]—Aznar pledged, as late as July 1998, not to break up with the PNV.[105] Relations further strained after the signing of the Declaration of Estella between the PNV and Herri Batasuna in September 1998, with Aznar's government diregarding this accord as "complacent with ETA's interests".[106] Throughout 1999, the PNV became more belligerent by distancing itself from Aznar's government,[107] withdrawing its support informally since June and officially in December that year.[108][109][110]
Majestic Pact significance
[edit]
The Majestic Pact, under which both PP and CiU supported their respective governments in the Cortes Generales and the Parliament of Catalonia in the 1996–2004, would become a reference of understanding between the Spanish right-wing and the Catalan nationalism going forward, receiving both praise and criticism.[14][64][111][112] It saw the PP agreeing to the transfer to Catalonia of powers in matters of traffic, employment promotion and vocational training policies; the direct management of ports; a new model of regional financing—with the transfer of 30% of the management of the personal income tax to autonomous communities, as well as regional management of taxes on wealth, property transfers and documented legal acts, inheritance and gifts and gambling—the professionalization of the Armed Forces with the abolition of the compulsory military service; the reform of the State's peripheral administration to replace civil governors by provincial sub-delegates; and a reform of the Coastal Law to allow for "greater participation of the autonomous communities" in the planning and management of the coastline.[113][114] The Pact was also attributed the removal in September 1996 of People's Party of Catalonia leader Alejo Vidal-Quadras, who had been very critical of Pujol and supported a more hardline stance against Catalan nationalism.[115][116]
In his memoirs, published in 2012, Pujol admitted to having been reluctant to reach an agreement with Aznar,[117] but that Felipe González had convinced him out of institutional responsibility and political stability reasons.[118] He also recognized that, following his precarious victory at the 1999 regional election and Aznar's absolute majority in the 2000 general election, the balance between the two parties broke apart, realizing that the PP had only accepted his demands in 1996 because of his necessary parliamentary support.[118] Once CiU's votes were no longer required to sustain him in power, Aznar attempted to outmaneuver Pujol's party by offering them to enter the national government in 2001, subjecting CiU to more pressure in the Catalan parliament and dragging them into supporting initiatives in the Cortes—such as Aznar's proposal for a National Hydrological Plan which envisaged a water transfer in the Ebro river—that ended up being highly unpopular in Catalonia and helped hasten CiU's defeats in the 2003 regional and 2004 general elections.[118][119][120] Others, such as CiU spokesperson in the Congress between 2004 and 2015, Josep Antoni Duran i Lleida, came to praise the Majestic Pact as "the best agreement ever made for Catalonia" because, in his opinion, it led to "the highest rates of public investment by the State" in the region.[121]
In the ensuing decades, as the PP came to criticize the agreements reached by future Socialist prime ministers—José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero and, particularly, Pedro Sánchez—with Catalan and Basque nationalist parties, the Majestic Pact was frequently recalled as a prime example of the PP's own wilingness to make concessions in exchange of parliamentary support.[122][123] Critics of the Pact within the Spanish unionism camp blamed it for starting a path of "concessions" to Catalan nationalist parties that resulted in the 2006 Statute of Autonomy of Catalonia, the rise of the Catalan independence movement in 2012 (el procés, Catalan for "the process") and culminating in the 2017–2018 Spanish constitutional crisis.[124][125][126][127]
Notes
[edit]- ^ The name of "Majestic Pact" (Spanish: Pacto del Majestic) is a reference to the Majestic Hotel of Barcelona where the alliance between both PP and CiU was sealed on 28 April 1996.[1]
- ^ Translation provided by an official source; a literal translation of the text in Article 99.2 would be "proposed candidate" (Spanish: candidato propuesto).[2]
- ^ Herri Batasuna was not summoned to the round of talks as its two MPs did not attend the constitutive session of Congress to comply with the Constitution and, as a result, did not acquire full status as deputies.[47]
References
[edit]- ^ a b Farràs, Andreu (12 August 2013). "El pacto del Majestic se llama así por culpa de Gibraltar". El Periódico de Catalunya (in Spanish). Barcelona. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Constitución Española (Spanish Constitution). Official Gazette of the State (in Spanish). Vol. 311. 29 December 1978. ISSN 0212-033X. BOE-A-1978-31229. Retrieved 27 December 2016.
- ^ "The Spanish Constitution" (PDF). Official Gazette of the State. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 2 August 2020.
- ^ Ruiz de Azúa, Victorino (3 March 1996). "Aznar apuesta todo a la mayoría casi absoluta". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ "Aznar obtiene una mayoría insuficiente para gobernar en solitario". El País (in Spanish). 4 March 1996. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ "Decepción en el PP tras lograr una exigua victoria". El Mundo (in Spanish). Madrid. 4 March 1996. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ "CiU no votará la investidura de Aznar si el PP gana las elecciones". El País (in Spanish). Barcelona. 28 February 1996. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Guenaga Bidaurrazaga, Aitor (29 February 1996). "El PNV ataca al PP por su crítica al concierto económico vasco". El País (in Spanish). Bilbao. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Fernández Trujillo, César (3 March 1996). "Coalición Canaria ofrece sus votos al partido ganador si apoya sus propuestas "irrenunciables" para las islas". El País (in Spanish). Santa Cruz de Tenerife. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Yárnoz, Carlos (4 March 1996). "Aznar gana, pero necesita pactos para gobernar". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Brunet, José María (4 March 1996). "Ni absoluta ni suficiente". La Vanguardia (in Spanish). Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ "El PNV considera que los resultados le abren la posibilidad de "intervenir en España"". El País (in Spanish). Bilbao. 4 March 1996. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Rodríguez Aizpeolea, Luis (14 March 1996). "La carrera de obstáculos de Aznar". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ a b Alzcáraz, Mayte (8 November 2015). "El «Majestic» que llevó a Aznar a La Moncloa y hoy incomoda al PP". ABC (in Spanish). Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ Gil, Andrés (27 July 2016). "Aznar se presentó a la investidura en el 96 sin tener cerrados los apoyos que ahora exige Rajoy". eldiario.es (in Spanish). Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ "Aznar responde al cántico 'Pujol, enano, habla castellano' tras su victoria electoral en 1996: "Fue un poco jocoso"" (in Spanish). laSexta. 26 February 2021. Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ Pastor, Carles (5 March 1996). "CiU se abstendrá o votará en contra de la investidura de José María Aznar". El País (in Spanish). Barcelona. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Díez, Anabel; Rodríguez Aizpeolea, Luis (5 March 1996). "González pide serenidad a los mercados y garantiza un traspaso de poder "ordenado y responsable"". El País (in Spanish). Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ "González ve «difícil, pero no imposible», un acuerdo del PP con CiU". El Mundo (in Spanish). Madrid. 5 March 1996. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Vidal-Folch, Xavier (5 March 1996). "Borrell espera que Pujol niegue su voto a Aznar". El País (in Spanish). Brussels. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Fernández Trujillo, César (5 March 1996). "Coalición Canaria ofrece a CiU y PNV negociar el apoyo al PP". El País (in Spanish). Santa Cruz de Tenerife. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Hermida, Xosé (5 March 1996). "El BNG propone una alianza entre el PSOE y los nacionalistas". El País (in Spanish). Santiago de Compostela. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ "'No nos resignamos' pide a la izquierda que rechace la investidura de Aznar". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. 7 March 1996. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Rodríguez Aizpeolea, Luis; Díez, Anabel (8 March 1996). "El PNV pedirá a Aznar que cambie su política de pacificación". El País (in Spanish). Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ "Aznar admite que sólo un pacto con Pujol evitará nuevas elecciones". El País (in Spanish). 7 March 1996. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ a b Serrano, Sebastián (5 March 1996). "Aznar no puede elegir pareja". El País (in Spanish). Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ a b Vela, Carmen (7 March 1996). "El PP ofrecerá formar Gobierno a CiU, PNV y canarios aunque no acepten". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ "Aznar inicia su acercamiento a Pujol con una oferta de cesión de impuestos". El País (in Spanish). 6 March 1996. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Pastor, Carles; Martín del Pozo, Concha (20 March 1996). "CiU estudia plantear un "pacto fiscal" bilateral". El País (in Spanish). Barcelona / Madrid. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Rodríguez Aizpeolea, Luis (7 March 1996). "La negociación con CiU levanta recelos entre los aliados regionalistas del Partido Popular". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Ruiz de Azúa, Victorino (13 March 1996). "Aznar explica a González su oferta de pacto". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ "González anima a Aznar a volcarse en la búsqueda del pacto con CiU". El País (in Spanish). 16 March 1996. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Lucio, Lourdes; Ruiz de Azúa, Victorino (18 March 1996). "Gonzalez vaticina un Gobierno de Aznar breve e incapaz que devolverá al PSOE la mayoría". El País (in Spanish). Linares / Madrid. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Brunet, José María (4 March 1996). "El PSOE encaja la derrota como un triunfo". La Vanguardia (in Spanish). Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Valdecantos, Camilo (4 March 1996). "La presidencia del Congreso, primera pieza que habrá de jugar el PP". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ "El PP se asegura la presidencia del Congreso gracias al apoyo de CiU". El País (in Spanish). 21 March 1996. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Rodríguez Aizpeolea, Luis (21 March 1996). "PP y CiU alcanzan su acuerdo con el reparto de las Mesas del Congreso y el Senado". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ "Pactos. CiU advierte que la investidura de Aznar no puede prolongarse más allá del 24 o el 25 de abril" (in Spanish). Madrid: Servimedia. 21 March 1996. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Lozano, Carles. "Elecciones Generales 3 de marzo de 1996". Historia Electoral.com (in Spanish). Retrieved 12 March 2025.
- ^ Brunet, José María (28 March 1996). "La nueva mayoría PP-nacionalistas elige a Trillo presidente del Congreso". La Vanguardia (in Spanish). Madrid: University of Delaware. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Valdecantos, Camilo (28 March 1996). "Trillo llama al diálogo desde la tolerancia". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ "Aznar: "Algunos que tenían dudas de que el PP había ganado las elecciones, después de hoy se les habrán quitado"" (in Spanish). Madrid: Servimedia. 27 March 1996. Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ Rivas, Javier (29 March 1996). "Aznar promete que los nacionalistas no piden nada que rompa la cohesión nacional". El País (in Spanish). Seville. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Pastor, Carles; Rodríguez Aizpeolea, Luis; Costa Pau, Marta (29 March 1996). "Molins afirma que si CiU quiere ser clave debe votar a favor de la investidura de Aznar". El País (in Spanish). Barcelona / Madrid. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Rodríguez Aizpeolea, Luis; Mauri, Luis (2 April 1996). "Pujol exige a Aznar que reconozca el hecho diferencial catalán en su discurso de investidura". El País (in Spanish). Madrid / Barcelona. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Casqueiro, Javier (2 April 1996). "El líder del PP no avisó de su reunión con el presidente de Cataluña". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ a b Valdecantos, Camilo (29 March 1996). "El Rey realizará las consultas con los partidos entre el 2 y el 12". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 12 March 2025.
- ^ "El Rey inicia hoy la ronda de consultas con Unión Valenciana". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. 2 April 1996. Retrieved 12 March 2025.
- ^ "El Rey acaba esta semana su ronda política de consultas". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. 8 April 1996. Retrieved 12 March 2025.
- ^ Rodríguez Aizpeolea, Luis (2 April 1996). "Aznar se asegura los cuatro votos de Coalición Canaria a cambio de concesiones autonómicas". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 12 March 2025.
- ^ Pastor, Carles; Casqueiro, Javier (8 April 1996). "CiU y PNV no aclararán mañana al Rey su voto sobre la investidura". El País (in Spanish). Barcelona / Madrid. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ "El Rey comunica a Trillo que el líder del PP es el candidato a presidir el Gobierno". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. 13 April 1996. Retrieved 12 March 2025.
- ^ "Aznar confía en poder formar Gobierno en la última semana de abril". El País (in Spanish). 9 April 1996. Retrieved 15 March 2025.
- ^ a b c "Cronología de la negociación". El País (in Spanish). 28 April 1996. Retrieved 12 March 2025.
- ^ Missé, Andreu (14 April 1996). "PP y CiU logran un principio de acuerdo para compartir la gestión de la Agencia Tributaria". El País (in Spanish). Barcelona. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ González Ibáñez, Juan; González, Miguel (17 April 1996). "PP y CiU alcanzan un compromiso para suprimir el servicio militar". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Mauri, Luis; Ruiz de Azúa, Victorino (21 April 1996). "Aznar y Pujol desbloquean la negociación en su tercera entrevista desde las elecciones del 3-M". El País (in Spanish). Madrid / Barcelona. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Mauri, Luis; Pastor, Carles (23 April 1996). "CiU impone un parón en las negociaciones con los populares para la investidura de Aznar". El País (in Spanish). Madrid / Copenhague. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Casqueiro, Javier (23 April 1996). "El PP emplaza a CiU a dar su respuesta esta semana". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ "Pactos. El PP no descarta que la investidura sea 2 y 3 de mayo por lo apretado del calendario para los días 29 y 30 de abril" (in Spanish). Madrid: Servimedia. 25 April 1996. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Ruiz de Azúa, Victorino (26 April 1996). "Populares y convergentes inician la puesta por escrito del acuerdo para la investidura". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ a b Pastor, Carles (28 April 1996). "Aznar, Pujol, Duran y los negociadores sellan hoy el pacto con una cena en Barcelona". El País (in Spanish). Barcelona. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ González, Enric (25 August 1999). "La legislatura de la pareja de hecho". El País (in Spanish). Barcelona. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ a b Gisbert, Josep (25 April 2021). "El pacto del Majestic, una alianza de otra época". La Vanguardia (in Spanish). Barcelona. Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ Pastor, Carles (28 April 1996). "La larga marcha hacia el pacto". El País (in Spanish). Barcelona. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Rodríguez Aizpeolea, Luis (28 April 1996). "Aznar quiere incorporar al PNV al pacto antes de la investidura". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ "Aznar pacta con el PNV y logra el apoyo de todo el centro derecha a su investidura". El País (in Spanish). 30 April 1996. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Rodríguez Aizpeolea, Luis (30 April 1996). "Aznar culmina su estrategia de pactos al asegurarse el apoyo del PNV a su investidura". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ "Arzalluz elogia a Aznar, por cerrar un pacto que el PSOE no fue capaz de hacer". El País (in Spanish). 1 May 1996. Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ Goyoaga, Ander (30 April 2021). "Cuando Aznar invitó a Arzalluz a Génova 13". La Vanguardia (in Spanish). Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ "Trillo convoca el debate de investidura para el 3 y 4 de mayo" (in Spanish). Madrid: Servimedia. 29 April 1996. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Valdecantos, Camilo (30 April 1996). "El Congreso votará el sábado al cuarto presidente de la democracia". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ "Aznar ofrece un programa de centro con más poder para las autonomías". El País (in Spanish). 4 May 1996. Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ Ruiz de Azúa, Victorino (4 May 1996). "Aznar asegura que la reforma autonómica pactada con los nacionalistas es solidaria". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ Valdecantos, Camilo (4 May 1996). "Aznar pasa página y se ata al centro". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ Ruiz de Azúa, Victorino (4 May 1996). "Compromiso genérico para la reforma de la tarifa del IRPF". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ Díez, Anabel (5 May 1996). "González rechazó atacar a Aznar con los datos que le aportaron sus ministros". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ Serrano, Rodolfo (4 May 1996). "Anguita no consigue de Aznar el compromiso de investigar los GAL". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ Serrano, Rodolfo (5 May 1996). "Anguita vuelve a la tesis de las dos orillas y dice que el PSOE no hará oposición". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ Pastor, Carles (4 May 1996). "Molins pide que no se agiten en los enfrentamientos entre las comunidades". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ Rodríguez Aizpeolea, Luis (4 May 1996). "El candidato garantiza al PNV el desarrollo del estatuto". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ Casqueiro, Javier; Pastor, Carles (5 May 1996). "Rahola: "Molins comete fraude electoral al votar a Aznar"". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ "Investidura. Aznar recibió duras críticas a su investidura por parte de los representantes del Grupo Mixto" (in Spanish). Madrid: Servimedia. 4 May 1996. Retrieved 13 March 2025.
- ^ Lozano, Carles. "Congreso de los Diputados: Votaciones más importantes". Historia Electoral.com (in Spanish). Retrieved 12 March 2025.
- ^ a b Valdecantos, Camilo (5 May 1996). "Aznar, investido presidente, lleva al Gobierno al PP". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ Blanco, José Miguel (20 December 2015). "El periodo más largo entre las elecciones y la investidura ha sido de 62 días". La Vanguardia (in Spanish). Madrid. EFE. Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ "Récord en España de un Gobierno en funciones". El Mundo (in Spanish). Madrid. EFE. 21 February 2016. Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ "De los 29 días de Suárez a los 314 de Rajoy: así han durado los gobiernos en funciones en España". elDiario.es (in Spanish). 27 July 2023. Retrieved 14 March 2025.
- ^ "1996. El PP gana las elecciones tras 14 años de felipismo" (in Spanish). Telemadrid. 25 April 2019. Retrieved 15 March 2025.
- ^ Ruiz de Azúa, Victorino (5 May 1996). "Un Gobierno de orígenes muy diversos". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 15 March 2025.
- ^ Ruiz de Azúa, Victorino (6 May 1996). "Aznar anuncia diálogo con partidos y sindicatos desde un Gobierno "centrista y reformador"". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 15 March 2025.
- ^ Pastor, Carles (5 November 1997). "CiU advierte al Gobierno que la ruptura será «inevitable» si las relaciones no mejoran". El País (in Spanish). Barcelona: University of Delaware. Retrieved 16 March 2025.
- ^ Rodríguez Aizpeolea, Luis (16 November 1997). "Economía reconoce que había un principio de acuerdo con CiU". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 16 March 2025.
- ^ Cruz, Marisa (15 January 1998). "CiU, el más sólido puntal, la más dura cadena". El Mundo (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 16 March 2025.
- ^ "Molins afirma que hay "un acuerdo bastante profundo" entre PP y CiU sobre el objetivo de los presupuestos para 1997" (in Spanish). Barcelona: Servimedia. 27 August 1996. Retrieved 16 March 2025.
- ^ Valdecantos, Camilo; Martín del Pozo, Concha (24 October 1996). "Aznar revalida con los Presupuestos el apoyo nacionalista que consiguió para su investidura". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 16 March 2025.
- ^ "El Congreso aprueba la Ley de Presupuetos y de Acompañamiento de 1998". El Mundo (in Spanish). Madrid. 23 December 1997. Retrieved 16 March 2025.
- ^ González, Enric; Rodríguez Aizpeolea, Luis (15 April 1998). "Aznar y Pujol acuerdan pactar el Presupuesto de 1999 para garantizar la estabilidad". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 16 March 2025.
- ^ "Aznar y Pujol formalizarán el pacto de los presupuestos de 1999 en la entrevista del miércoles" (in Spanish). Madrid: Servimedia. 26 July 1998. Retrieved 16 March 2025.
- ^ "El Congreso aprueba los Presupuestos Generales del Estado para el año 2000". El Mundo (in Spanish). Madrid. EFE. 22 December 1999. Retrieved 16 March 2025.
- ^ Rodríguez Aizpeolea, Luis; Pastor, Carlos (15 January 1998). "Aznar y Pujol refuerzan el pacto de estabilidad para que el PP pueda agotar la legislatura". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 16 March 2025.
- ^ "Ardanza advierte a Aznar que no tiene asegurado los votos del PNV para aprobar los presupuestos" (in Spanish). Valencia: Servimedia. 17 September 1996. Retrieved 16 March 2025.
- ^ Rodríguez Aizpeolea, Luis (26 March 1997). "Aznar cede ante el PNV y congela el Cupo pese a que no figuraba en el pacto de investidura". El País (in Spanish). Madrid. Retrieved 16 March 2025.
- ^ Fernández Fuertes, Santiago (20 December 1997). "El PNV destituye a los ediles del PP en Bilbao por "contumaz deslealtad" y rompe el pacto municipal". El País (in Spanish). Bilbao. Retrieved 16 March 2025.
- ^ "Aznar no se plantea romper con sus socios del PNV". El País (in Spanish). 2 July 1998. Retrieved 16 March 2025.
- ^ "El Gobierno descalifica el pacto de Estella por ser "complaciente" con los intereses de ETA". El País (in Spanish). 14 September 1998. Retrieved 29 January 2019.
- ^ Gómez Damborenea, Pedro (22 March 1999). "Arzalluz asegura que el tiempo de pactar con el Gobierno de Madrid se ha terminado". El País (in Spanish). Bilbao. Retrieved 16 March 2025.
- ^ "Aliados nacionalistas". El País (in Spanish). 24 June 1999. Retrieved 16 March 2025.
- ^ "El PNV rompe con el Gobierno y anuncia su voto contrario a los Presupuestos". Última Hora (in Spanish). Madrid. OTR Press. 9 December 1999. Retrieved 16 March 2025.
- ^ Larraya, José Miguel; Rodríguez Aizpeolea, Luis (10 December 1999). "Aznar exige al PNV que explique por qué rompe con todos menos con HB". El País (in Spanish). Helsinki / Madrid. Retrieved 16 March 2025.
- ^ Gil, Andrés (20 July 2016). "Desde el pacto del Majestic hasta Ana Pastor: dos décadas de acuerdos del PP con nacionalistas". eldiario.es (in Spanish). Retrieved 15 March 2025.
- ^ Melgar, Gerard (27 June 2024). "José María Aznar reivindica en Barcelona el 'pacto del Majestic' con Jordi Pujol: "No fue un chantaje para intercambiar investidura por impunidad y privilegio"". El Mundo (in Spanish). Barcelona. Retrieved 15 March 2025.
- ^ "Qué cesiones a CIU incluía el 'pacto del Majestic', el acuerdo de investidura entre Aznar y Pujol en 1996" (in Spanish). Maldita.es. 14 November 2023. Retrieved 15 March 2025.
- ^ Aduriz, Iñigo (10 August 2024). "El PP de Aznar permitió a Catalunya llegar a gestionar el 30% del IRPF y le dio el 100% de patrimonio, sucesiones y juego". elDiario.es (in Spanish). Retrieved 15 March 2025.
- ^ "Vidal-Quadras afirma que Aznar erró al forzar su exclusión de la dirección del PP catalán". El País (in Spanish). Barcelona. 31 December 1996. Retrieved 16 March 2025.
- ^ Gubern, Álex; Tercero, Daniel (23 December 2018). "Del pacto del Majestic al del Palacio de Pedralbes, dos décadas de deslealtad". ABC (in Spanish). Retrieved 16 March 2025.
- ^ Masreal, Fidel (16 February 2012). "De cómo pactar con el PP". El Periódico de Catalunya (in Spanish). Barcelona. Retrieved 16 March 2025.
(...) "No parecía en principio que tuviéramos ninguna otra opción que entendernos de nuevo con Aznar. Entrar en la confrontación directa con el PP hacía muy difícil nuestra posición como Govern y nos hacía renunciar a cualquier posibilidad de influencia en la política española. Reconozco que la colaboración con el PP no me hacía ninguna ilusión, pero no había alternativa", sostiene Pujol
- ^ a b c Roger, Maiol (16 February 2012). "Jordi Pujol: del Pacto del Majestic a la Convergència de 'Andreu' Mas". El País (in Spanish). Barcelona. Retrieved 15 March 2025.
- ^ Roger, Maiol (28 January 2012). "El fantasma del Majestic sobrevuela CiU". El País (in Spanish). Barcelona. Retrieved 15 March 2025.
- ^ Cañizares, María Jesús (16 February 2012). "Del pacto del Majestic a la independencia". ABC (in Spanish). Retrieved 15 March 2025.
- ^ "Duran presume de que el Pacto del Majestic ha sido "el mejor" acuerdo para Catalunya" (in Spanish). Madrid: Europa Press. 9 March 2011. Retrieved 15 March 2025.
- ^ Nadi, Sohaib (18 September 2023). "El PP de Aznar hizo concesiones inéditas a los nacionalistas: "Él estaba dispuesto a todo con tal de gobernar"" (in Spanish). Madrid: Cadena SER. Retrieved 15 March 2025.
- ^ Gil, Andrés; Sánchez, Raúl (23 September 2023). "Dinero, indultos a Terra Lliure y gobernadores civiles: cuando González y Aznar pactaban con los nacionalistas y España no se rompía". elDiario.es (in Spanish). Retrieved 15 March 2025.
- ^ Tercero, Alejandro (25 May 2013). "Aznar, el mejor presidente para los intereses del nacionalismo catalán". La Voz de Barcelona (in Spanish). Retrieved 16 March 2025.
- ^ Carreira, Sara (26 November 2017). "Pere Lluís Huguet Tous: «El pacto del Majestic fue el principio, el Estado desapareció de Cataluña»". La Voz de Galicia (in Spanish). Retrieved 16 March 2025.
- ^ "Carrizosa (Cs) dice que los catalanes aún están "pagando" el Pacto del Majestic de PP y CiU". infobae (in Spanish). 29 April 2024. Retrieved 16 March 2025.
- ^ "Pujol y la nostalgia del Majestic". ABC (in Spanish). 2 February 2025. Retrieved 16 March 2025.