Jump to content

2011 Slovenian YouTube incident

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 2011 Slovenian YouTube incident was the publication of three clips of the recordings of closed sessions of the Government of Slovenia on the video-sharing website YouTube on 3 December 2011.[1] The clips were published under the title Stari obrazi (Old Faces) by someone who signed himself as stariobrazi (oldfaces).[2][3] The publication happened during the term of the Prime Minister Borut Pahor, just before the early 2011 Slovenian parliamentary election on 4 December.[4]

The first of the clips published was dated to 31 January 2008, when Janez Janša was the Prime Minister. The second and the third clip was dated to 23 April 2009, respectively 23 April and 30 April 2009, when Borut Pahor was the Prime Minister.[1] The original recordings were produced in audio and video.[5] They were stored on DVDs and locked in a safe available only to authorised personnel.[6] They were also available at home to three people via the Spectiva remote viewing software,[7] but due to their low quality, the probability of Spectiva being the source of the leaked data has been estimated as low, and it was not used during the term of Pahor's government.[8] Spectiva could be misused until July 2009.[9] It seems most probable that the recordings originated from the recording room or were transferred with additional equipment from the press room of the government; till 2009, sessions were broadcast live there so that extracts of resolutions could be made by the authorised personnel.[8]

Marjan Miklavčič, an expert in intelligence services and a lecturer at the University of Maribor, compared the publication to WikiLeaks. He particularly stressed that it was not known which data had been stolen and whether they could be used for extortion.[10] Iztok Prezelj, who lectures on intelligence at the University of Ljubljana, stated that the publication showed a parallel state to exist in Slovenia.[11] Miklavčič confirmed that all the data publicly available indicate the thesis about a parallel state to be correct.[12]

Content

[edit]

The ministers of Janša's government, Andrej Vizjak and Mojca Kucler Dolinar, were discussing the wages of judges. The recordings of Pahor's sessions showed the Foreign Minister Samuel Žbogar reporting about the pressures from the European Union on Slovenia regarding the Slovenian blockade of Croatian entry to the Union and the Interior Minister Katarina Kresal discussing the acquisition of water cannons for the Slovenian Police.[9]

Investigation

[edit]

On 9 December, it was reported that the Slovenian Police had started investigation about the clips.[10] On 14 December, the Government spokesperson Darijan Košir explained that in 2006, government areas were renovated.[5] He said that the recorded sessions were held at Gregorčič Street 20 (Gregorčičeva ulica 20; Government and Presidential Palace) and the recording room was at Gregorčič Street 25. The buildings were connected with 200 metres (660 feet) of cable. The system could be abused at several points. The works at Gregorčič Street 25 were carried out by the construction company SCT, and the computer infrastructure was set up by the companies ADM and TSE. Košir told that all the people with access to the data were thoroughly checked. On 12 December, after the Secretariat filed a criminal complaint, the Police requested an internal report from the Secretary-General Kamnar.[13]

On 15 December, TSE denied having spotted any anomalies in the computer system since it had been installed. They told that all their employees were checked and that they never received any instruction that would allow for an illegal access. They also pointed out that the Government was responsible for the security of the system after it had been taken over. The telephone number of ADM was unavailable.[14][15] Rumors about a slow investigation due to long preparation of report by the Secretary-General appeared. Both the minister of interior and the Secretary-General denied this.[13]

On 11 January 2012, an inspectional surveillance, ordered by the Information Commissioner Nataša Pirc Musar, was carried out by the Inspectorate for Protection of Personal Data at the Secretary–General. As of 27 January 2012, the findings were not available yet. The results will influence the decision of the Government about the destruction of the original session recordings.[7]

On 26 January 2012, the Secretariat-General of the Government issued a report about an internal investigation that failed to find the perpetrator.[16] However, it was found out that the clips were carefully chosen and taken out of context, giving them a different meaning than they would have in the whole.[17] They were alienated after they had been processed in the recording room. This significantly narrowed the number of supply locations and the circle of possible suspects.[18] The highest risk was associated with the human factor.[19] The Secretariat–General identified the crimes of betrayal of secrets, misuse of position, unauthorized image recording, and an information system attack.[20] Due to lack of jurisdiction of the Government, further investigation would be carried out by the police.[18]

On 27 January 2012, Helena Kamnar, the Secretary-General of the Government, unofficially told for media that three people had access to the Spectiva remote viewing software, and could also watch the sessions from their home.[7] Kamnar also explained that it was possible to find out who had access in which period but had no information due to the police having confiscated one of the computers.[7] On 28 January 2012, she told that according to the information she had received from the person who allocated the right to use the system, the three people were Janez Janša, the former Secretary-General Božo Predalič, and the former Secretary-General Milan M. Cvikl.[21] They only had the possibility to use it in their respective terms.[21] Predalič told that he used it perhaps twice, because he was present at Janša's sessions and did not have the option to use it during Pahor's sessions.[21] Cvikl told that he refused to use it as it seemed redundant to him and due to security reasons even demanded it to be uninstalled.[22]

The confiscated computers were returned to the Secretary-General on 31 January 2012. The next morning, Kamnar found the doors of the secretary open and reasoned that someone had broken in. Nothing was stolen. The Government officially denied any evidence that a criminal act had happened. There were guesses whether the two events could be related, but Kamnar decided there would be no investigation, as the possibility of it being successful was slim and she was to be replaced by the new government.[8] Since February 2012, the government is again led by Janša, and the Secretary-General is again Predalič.[23]

On 27 March 2012, the information commissioner reported that the measures for the safeguarding of the recordings were inadequate. Although the places where the recording device was situated and the recordings were kept were guarded, there were no revision marks on them, which would enable the tracing of their production, usage, viewing and processing. The law on the protection of personal data was not broken.[24]

In September 2012, the pre-trial procedure had not been completed yet by the police.[9]

Response by the Government

[edit]

On 7 December, the Secretary-General of the Government filed a criminal complaint against the unknown perpetrator and notified about the incident the Criminal Police Directorate and the Office for the Protection of Classified Information.[25] On 8 December, the Slovenian government demanded the removal of the clips from YouTube. On 9 December in the evening, when the publication was reported for the first time by media, there were three clips remaining of the allegedly original five although none had been removed by the host.[4] YouTube had removed the clips on 15 December 2011, after a copyright-related demand by the Slovenian Computer Emergency Response Team (SI–CERT).[26][27] However, on the same day they appeared again, albeit shorter.[14] They were removed again in less than 24 hours. The clips were republished by users who downloaded them after they have been found by media. The original perpetrator as well as the uploaders were unknown.[2][4][26] The decision about the destruction of the original governmental recordings has not been made yet, pending the results of an inspectional surveillance.[25] After the incident, the recordings were not produced until 26 January.[28] Since then, they have been made only in audio and have been destroyed immediately after extracts had been made.[8] They are not transmitted via cable to another building anymore.[28] In April 2012, the deputy of the Secretary-General stated that the affair cannot repeat itself, because the government had implemented the traceability of users of governmental session video recordings.[29]

Previous leakages

[edit]

A tone clip of a closed government session was inadvertently leaked to the website of the Government already on 2 July 2009.[30] It showed Katarina Kresal, the former Minister of the Interior, and Irma Pavlinič Krebs, the former Minister of Public Administration, in a wrangle about the number of the policemen in Slovenia, and had a large echo in the public. Krebs later commented: "I didn't know that our areas have ears."[31]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b "Poročilo Generalnega sekretariata Vlade RS v zvezi z nezakonito objavo posnetkov sej vlad na spletnem portalu YouTube" [The Report of the Secretariat–General of the Government of the Republic of Slovenia Regarding the Illegal Publication of the Recordings of Government Sessions on the YouTube Web Portal] (in Slovenian). Government of the Republic of Slovenia. 26 January 2012.[permanent dead link]
  2. ^ a b "Posnetki vladnih sej že drugič umaknjeni s spleta" [The Recordings of Government Sessions Removed From the Internet For the Second Time] (in Slovenian). MMC RTV Slovenia. 16 December 2011.
  3. ^ "Preiskava glede video posnetkov z zaprtih sej vlade" [The Investigation Regarding Video Recordings of the Closed Government Sessions] (in Slovenian). Demokracija. 9 December 2011.
  4. ^ a b c "Zaupna seja na spletu" [A Confidential Session on the Web] (in Slovenian). Žurnal24.si. 9 December 2011.
  5. ^ a b "Neuradno: vladne seje so bile posnete dvakrat" [Unofficially: Government Sessions Have Been Recorded Twice] (in Slovenian). Delo.si. 14 December 2011. ISSN 1854-6544.
  6. ^ "Podtalna politična vojna" [Underground Political War] (in Slovenian). Dnevnik.si. 17 December 2011.
  7. ^ a b c d "Dostop do Spective naj bi imele tri osebe" [Three Persons are Supposed to Had Access to Spectiva]. Planet Siol.net (in Slovenian). TSmedia, medijske vsebine in storitve, d.o.o. 27 January 2012. Archived from the original on 10 September 2017. Retrieved 27 January 2012.
  8. ^ a b c d "Helena Kamnar: jezna sem" [Helena Kamnar: I'm Angry]. Mladina (in Slovenian). 8 February 2012.
  9. ^ a b c Kajzer, Rok (2 September 2012). "Kontrolna točka" [Control Point]. Delo.si (in Slovenian). ISSN 1854-6544.
  10. ^ a b "Afera YouTube: Pahor je objektivno odgovoren in bi moral še enkrat odstopiti" [YouTube Affair: Pahor is Objectively Responsible and Should Step Down] (in Slovenian). MMC RTV Slovenia. 9 November 2011.
  11. ^ Dejan Karba (15 December 2011). "Pri posnetkih gre za nezaupnico varnosti v vladnih krogih" [The Recordings Are About A Motion of No Confidence To Security in Government Circles] (in Slovenian). Delo.si. ISSN 1854-6544.
  12. ^ Dejan Karba (16 December 2011). "Pustimo, da organi pregona opravijo svoje delo" [Let The Enforcement Agencies Do Their Job] (in Slovenian). Delo.si. ISSN 1854-6544.
  13. ^ a b "Delo Hints at Delay in YouTube Leak Inquiry, Govt Disagrees". Slovenian Press Agency. 19 December 2012.
  14. ^ a b "Vlada dosegla umik posnetkov" [The Government Achieved The Removal of the Recordings] (in Slovenian). 24ur.com. 15 December 2011.
  15. ^ "Montažerji vladnih kamer o zlorabah ne vedo nič" [The Fitters of Government Cameras Don't Know Anything About Misuses] (in Slovenian). Planet Siol.net. 15 December 2011.
  16. ^ "Vladi se ne sanja, kdo je objavil posnetek" [The Government has no Idea Who Published the Recording] (in Slovenian). MMC RTV Slovenia. 26 January 2012.
  17. ^ Karba, Dejan (27 January 2012). "Na sledi tatovom, ki so izmaknili posnetke vladnih sej" [On the Scent of the Thieves who Snatched the Recordings of Government Sessions]. Delo.si (in Slovenian). Delo, d. d. ISSN 1854-6544.
  18. ^ a b "Posnetke na YouTube lansiral nekdo blizu vladi" [The Recordings Were Launched To YouTube by Someone Close to the Government]. Žurnal24.si (in Slovenian). 26 January 2012.
  19. ^ Lončar, Andreja (26 January 2012). "Vlada: Posnetki sej vlade zmontirani izven naših prostorov" [The Recordings of the Government Sessions Edited Outside our Areas]. Finance.si (in Slovenian).
  20. ^ "Interna preiskava ni razkrila storilcev". Dnevnik.si. Dnevnik, d. d. 28 January 2012.
  21. ^ a b c "Kamnarjeva o posnetkih sej: Dostop do Spective naj bi imeli Janša, Predalič in Cvikl" [Kamnar About the Recordings of Sessions: The Access is Presumed to have been Available to Janša, Predalič and Cvikl]. Dnevnik.si (in Slovenian). 28 January 2012.[permanent dead link]
  22. ^ "Cvikl o posnetkih vladnih sej: Opozarjal sem na (ne)varnost" [Cvikl About the Recordings of Government Sessions: I Was Warning About the Danger]. MMC RTV Slovenia (in Slovenian). 31 January 2012.
  23. ^ "Vlada na prvi seji o javnih financah; opravljene že prve menjave" [The Government First Session About Public Finances; First Replacements Done]. Radio Ognjišče (in Slovenian). 11 February 2012.
  24. ^ "Informacijska pooblaščenka: Neustrezno zavarovani posnetki vladnih sej" [Information Commissioner: Inadequately Protected Recordings of Government Sessions] (in Slovenian). 27 March 2012.
  25. ^ a b "Posnetki sej so bili montirani in objavljeni izven prostorov vlade" [The Recordings of Sessions Were Edited and Published Outside the Government Areas] (in Slovenian). Siol.net. 26 January 2012.
  26. ^ a b "Posnetke so začeli umikati šele po grožnji s tožbo" [They Started to Remove the Recordings Only After a Lawsuit Threat] (in Slovenian). Slovenske novice. 15 December 2011.
  27. ^ "Neuradno: Le trije bi lahko odtujili posnetke vlade" [Unofficially: Only Three People Could Alienate the Government Recordings]. 24ur.com (in Slovenian). Pro Plus, d. o. o. 27 January 2012.
  28. ^ a b Karba, Dejan (31 January 2012). "Skrivnosti posnetkov vladnih sej" [Secrets of the Recordings of Government Sessions]. Delo (in Slovenian). ISSN 1854-6544. Archived from the original on 2 February 2012. Retrieved 14 February 2012.
  29. ^ "Z granitnimi kockami nad vladna vozila: kamere delovale, alarm ne" [With Granite Blocks Against the Governmental Vehicles: Cameras Were Functional, the Alarm Not]. MMC RTV Slovenija (in Slovenian). RTV Slovenija. 3 April 2012.
  30. ^ "Avdio: Na vladi prepir o zmanjševanju zaposlenih" [Audio: A Wrangle at the Government about Reducing the Number of Employed]. MMC RTV Slovenia (in Slovenian). RTV Slovenija. 2 July 2009. ISSN 1581-372X.
  31. ^ Karba, Dejan (27 January 2012). "Seja vlade iz domačega fotelja" [Government Session from the Home Armchair]. Delo.si (in Slovenian). Delo, d. d. ISSN 1854-6544.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2011_Slovenian_YouTube_incident&oldid=1195936376"