Battle of Pangal
An editor has nominated this article for deletion. You are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion, which will decide whether or not to retain it. |
 | This article may incorporate text from a large language model. (April 2024) |
| Battle of Pangal | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||
| Belligerents | |||||||||
 Vijayanagar Empire |
 Golconda Sultanate | ||||||||
| Commanders and leaders | |||||||||
|
Unknown[4][dubious – discuss] |
Quli Qutb Shah | ||||||||
| Strength | |||||||||
|
30000 Infantry 3000 Cavalry | Unknown | ||||||||
  Location within India | |||||||||
The Battle of Pangal was a significant military engagement between the forces of the Vijayanagar Empire and the Golconda Sultanate, or Qutb Shahi dynasty, in 1512 A.D. It took place in the vicinity of Pangal fort, marked by strategic shifts in control over the years.[1][2][dubious – discuss]
Background
[edit]The region surrounding Pangal was fraught with political tensions, with successive powers vying for control. The fort changed hands multiple times, reflecting the volatile nature of the area.[5][dubious – discuss] The clash between the Vijayanagar Empire and the Golconda Sultanate or Qutb Shahi dynasty was a culmination of this regional power struggle.[1][2][dubious – discuss][3][6][self-published source?]
Battle
[edit]The forces of Krishnadevaraya, the Vijayanagar king, confronted Quli Qutb Shah's Golconda army near Pangal.[5][dubious – discuss] The battle was characterized by fierce combat and strategic maneuvering, with both sides deploying cavalry, archers, and infantry. Despite initial successes, Krishnadevaraya's forces eventually retreated, leaving a small garrison to defend the fort.[7][dubious – discuss]
Aftermath
[edit]Following the battle, Pangal remained under the control of the Golconda Sultanate or Qutb Shahi dynasty. The fort's significance persisted through subsequent centuries, serving as a residence for nobles and hosting dignitaries like Nizam Ali Khan.[5][dubious – discuss] Its strategic location along rivers contributed to its military and administrative importance, shaping the region's history and governance.[1][2][dubious – discuss][3]
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d Cohen, B. (2007-01-08). Kingship and Colonialism in India's Deccan 1850–1948. Springer. p. 47. ISBN 978-0-230-60344-8.
- ^ a b c d Sharma, M. H. Rama (1956). The History Of The Vijayanagar Empire. p. 121.
- ^ a b c Rocco, Sha (1960). Golconda and the Qutb Shahs. Printed at the "Civil and Military Gazette" Press. p. 6.
- ^ Sharma, M. H. Rama (1956). The History Of The Vijayanagar Empire.
The next day a siege was laid to Pangal, which Kuli tried to recovery by force. But the officer, in charge of the place, a relation of Krishna, gallantly defended it for two months
- ^ a b c Bilgrami, Syed Ali Asgar (1992). Landmarks of the Deccan: A Comprehensive Guide to the Archaeological Remains of the City and Suburbs of Hyderabad. Asian Educational Services. p. 194. ISBN 978-81-206-0543-5.
- ^ Chandraiah, K. (1998). Hyderabad, 400 Glorious Years. K. Chandraiah Memorial Trust. p. 4.
- ^ Sewell, Robert; Nunes, Fernão; Paes, Domingos (2000). A Forgotten Empire (Vijayanagar): A Contribution to the History of India. Asian Educational Services. pp. 132–133. ISBN 978-81-206-0125-3.