Carney v. Adams

Carney v. Adams
Carney v. Adams
	Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 10, 2020
Full case name	Carney v. Adams
Docket no.	19-309
Citations	592 U.S. ___ (more)
Holding
	Because Adams did not show that he was "able and ready" to apply for a judicial vacancy in the imminent future, he failed to show a "personal," "concrete" and "imminent" injury necessary for Article III standing.
Court membership
	Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices Clarence Thomas · Stephen Breyer; Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor; Elena Kagan · Neil Gorsuch; Brett Kavanaugh · Amy Coney Barrett
Case opinion
Majority	Breyer, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
	Article III

Carney v. Adams, 592 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that, because Adams did not show that he was "able and ready" to apply for a judicial vacancy in the imminent future, he failed to show a "personal," "concrete" and "imminent" injury necessary for Article III standing.^[1]^[2]

References

^ Carney v. Adams, No. 19-309, 592 U.S. ___ (2020).
^ "Opinion analysis: Court throws out challenge to Delaware rules on bipartisanship in judiciary". SCOTUSblog. December 10, 2020. Retrieved October 29, 2024.

External links

Text of Carney v. Adams, No. 19-309, 592 U.S. ___ (2020) is available from: Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

[case-1] Carney v. Adams, No. 19-309, 592 U.S. ___ (2020).

[2] "Opinion analysis: Court throws out challenge to Delaware rules on bipartisanship in judiciary". SCOTUSblog. December 10, 2020. Retrieved October 29, 2024.

[1]

[2]