Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation
| Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Decided April 21, 2022 | |
| Full case name | Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation |
| Docket no. | 20-1566 |
| Citations | 596 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Holding | |
| In a suit raising non-federal claims against a foreign state or instrumentality under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, a court should determine the substantive law by using the same choice-of-law rule applicable in a similar suit against a private party. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Kagan, joined by unanimous |
| Laws applied | |
| Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act | |
Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that, in a suit raising non-federal claims against a foreign state or instrumentality under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, a court should determine the substantive law by using the same choice-of-law rule applicable in a similar suit against a private party.[1][2]
References
[edit]External links
[edit]- Text of Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation, No. 20-1566, 596 U.S. ___ (2022) is available from: Justia
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |