Category talk:Women composers
Appearance
This category was nominated for deletion on 27 April 2013. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Category title
[edit]Would Female composers be more accurate? scarecroe 01:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
debate
[edit]An unsourced claim of former debate is irrelevant. Septentrionalis 21:36, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
Cfd 22 Aug 2005
[edit]No consensus, no change, see discussion for details. However, previous Cfd was to delete, you can see the entire 15 June Cfd discussion here, and following conversations covering gender related categories. ∞Who?¿? 01:33, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
- Thank you; this reference should have been supplied to the deletion discussion. I will comment here that Niteowlneil's argument seems to ignore the fundamental category structure; there shouldn't be any individual bio's in Category:Composers or Category:scientists; all should be subcatted by period, style/science, and (why not?) gender. Septentrionalis 17:23, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
CFD
[edit]This category was nominated for deletion on 18 July 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This category was nominated for deletion on 4 December 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
hurp durp woman composer —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.160.195.171 (talk) 14:04, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Women composers / Women classical composers
[edit]What is the distinction between the two categories? Schissel | Sound the Note! 17:16, 1 July 2010 (UTC)