Draft:Ruuvi Innovations

Review waiting, please be patient.

This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,817 pending submissions waiting for review.

If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space.
If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here.
In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Reviewer tools

Instructions · What links here · Ruuvi Innovations (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Wikipedia) · Submitted 21 days ago by Marko Aamunkajo at Ruuvi (talk: D · +) · Last edited 21 days ago by Marko Aamunkajo at Ruuvi

Submission declined on 3 March 2025 by SafariScribe (talk).

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by SafariScribe 2 months ago. Last edited by Marko Aamunkajo at Ruuvi 21 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Submission declined on 17 February 2025 by SafariScribe (talk).

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by SafariScribe 3 months ago.

Comment: Doesn't meet WP:NCORP. Githhub is not reliable. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this page. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Markoruuvi (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection. ((Optional) I work for the company.)

Ruuvi Innovations Ltd. (Oy)^[1] is a Finnish IoT company specializing in open-source wireless sensors for environmental monitoring. Known for the RuuviTag^[2] sensor, the company develops products used in smart homes, industrial settings, and scientific applications. Ruuvi is headquartered in Riihimäki, Finland, and is recognized for its commitment to open-source development and community-driven innovation.

History

Ruuvi was founded in 2016^[1] by Lauri Jämsä, evolving from his earlier electronics community project, Ruuvipenkki.

Ruuvi launched the RuuviTag, a compact Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) sensor beacon for environmental monitoring, after a successful Kickstarter campaign that raised $170,525.^[3] Development of Ruuvi Station,^[4] a companion app for RuuviTag sensors, started as a browser based app during the crowdfunding campaign. Soon afterwards the first versions of Ruuvi Station Android and iOS mobile apps were launched.

Ruuvi expanded its product line, introducing the RuuviTag Pro^[5] in 2021, featuring an IP67/IP68/IP69K-rated rugged enclosure, and the Ruuvi Gateway,^[6] a router device designed to forward collected Bluetooth Low Energy beacon data, alongside a beta version of Ruuvi Cloud,^[7] a cloud service designed to collect, store, and manage data captured from Ruuvi sensor beacons through Ruuvi Gateway router devices. In 2023, Ruuvi announced the full launch of Ruuvi Cloud, expanding remote monitoring capabilities for users (Jämsä, 2023).^[8]

References

^ ^a ^b "YTJ Tietopalvelu". tietopalvelu.ytj.fi (in Finnish). Retrieved 2025-02-14.
^ "Nettiyhteisö, avoimuus ja joukkorahoitus – uuden yrittäjän avainsanat". Ruuvi (in Finnish). 7 July 2016. Retrieved 2025-02-14.
^ "RuuviTag Bluetooth beacon project meets its Kickstarter goal in just hours". AfterDawn. Retrieved 2025-02-14.
^ "Ruuvi Station - Apps on Google Play". play.google.com. Retrieved 2025-02-14.
^ "Tarvitsetko lämpötila-, paine- ja liikemittaria haastaviin oloihin – Kokeilussa Ruuvi Tag Pro: Kestää Lapin talvipakkasesta saunaan". Tekniikka&Talous (in Finnish). 12 December 2021. Retrieved 2025-02-24.
^ "RuuviTagien data pilveen – testissä 200 euron siltalaite". Tekniikka&Talous (in Finnish). 26 January 2022. Retrieved 2025-02-24.
^ "Buy Ruuvi Cloud subscription". Ruuvi Cloud Shop. Retrieved 2025-02-14.
^ "Ruuvi Cloud launched". X.com. Retrieved 2025-02-14.

External links

Official Website

[:0-1] "YTJ Tietopalvelu". tietopalvelu.ytj.fi (in Finnish). Retrieved 2025-02-14.

[:1-2] "Nettiyhteisö, avoimuus ja joukkorahoitus – uuden yrittäjän avainsanat". Ruuvi (in Finnish). 7 July 2016. Retrieved 2025-02-14.

[3] "RuuviTag Bluetooth beacon project meets its Kickstarter goal in just hours". AfterDawn. Retrieved 2025-02-14.

[:2-4] "Ruuvi Station - Apps on Google Play". play.google.com. Retrieved 2025-02-14.

[:3-5] "Tarvitsetko lämpötila-, paine- ja liikemittaria haastaviin oloihin – Kokeilussa Ruuvi Tag Pro: Kestää Lapin talvipakkasesta saunaan". Tekniikka&Talous (in Finnish). 12 December 2021. Retrieved 2025-02-24.

[:4-6] "RuuviTagien data pilveen – testissä 200 euron siltalaite". Tekniikka&Talous (in Finnish). 26 January 2022. Retrieved 2025-02-24.

[:5-7] "Buy Ruuvi Cloud subscription". Ruuvi Cloud Shop. Retrieved 2025-02-14.

[8] "Ruuvi Cloud launched". X.com. Retrieved 2025-02-14.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]