Draft:Starship flight test 9
![]() | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,277 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission rejected on 5 February 2025 by Pygos (talk). This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Rejected by Pygos 14 days ago. Last edited by Canadien1867 7 days ago. | ![]() |
Comment: I believe that an article regarding this topic has previously been deleted at AfD after the consensus of the community.Please refer to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starship flight test 9. Pygos (talk) 01:01, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, it was deleted. It has since been expanded and thus resubmitted for review.
- Check the note I left in the draft talk page, which I'll repeat here:
- "Article originally created by Canadien1867, then deleted. Given that the information regarding this flight has been expanded, I've submitted it for review.
- As this question was asked during the review of List of Super Heavy boosters, NASASpaceflight, as are videos they publish, per WP:RSYT.
- The redirect to List of Starship launches was a result of the deletion discussion."
- The submission violates no rules of Wikipedia, so please explain why its "contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia". Redacted II (talk) 02:05, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Counterargument: this article has been expanded and updated with a lot of new information since the deletion discussion. Also, the flight 8 article was created the day flight 6 lifted off, and if we follow that pattern, shouldn't this article have been created shortly after the flight 7 launch? Also, flight 8 is possibly launching in just 2 weeks (following the NET date of Feb 24th), and even more information about flight 9 will almost certainly be provided soon. Also, heres another fun fact: when the flight 8 article was created, it had significantly less information than the flight 9 article does now, and nobody seemed to care about it back then. Additionally, this flight 9 article has a wide variety of reliable sources, which some members of the original deletion discussion did not seem to notice or understand. Therefore, I believe this article can be created at this point, as there are no longer any valid reasons not to. Canadien1867 (talk) 23:13, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
---
Mission type | Flight test |
---|---|
Operator | SpaceX |
Spacecraft properties | |
Spacecraft | Starship Ship 35 |
Spacecraft type | Starship (Block 2) |
Manufacturer | SpaceX |
Start of mission | |
Launch date | NET April 2025[1] |
Rocket | Super Heavy (Block 1, B14 or B16) |
Launch site | Starbase, OLP-A |
End of mission | |
Landing site |
|
Starship flight test 9 will be the ninth flight test of A SpaceX Starship launch vehicle. Ship 35 and Booster 16 are expected to fly on this test flight.[2][3] It is expected to be the third flight of a Block 2 ship. Starship will likely be placed into a Low Earth orbit,[4] in order to deploy V3 Starlinks into LEO, should Flight 8 be successful.[5] This flight may be the first catch attempt of the ship, though this remains unconfirmed.[6][7]
SpaceX is expected to perform the test in 2025.[8]
Background
[edit]Vehicle testing ahead of launch
[edit]As of January 2025, testing has not yet begun for either vehicle. Ship 35 has finished its assembly in Mega Bay 2,[9] with the configuration of its heat shield hinting at catch hardware.[10] B16 is fully assembled, and is awaiting cryogenic testing.[11] NASASpaceflight has claimed that B14 may fly for a second time on flight 9, having previously flown on flight 7.[12]
Mission Profile
[edit]If flight 8 achieves all of its planned objectives, it is likely that flight 9 will visit Low Earth orbit. If this occurs, Ship 35 may deploy up to 54 Starlink V3 satellites, weighing approximately 108 t (238,000 lb).[13][14] It will then relight its engines and perform a deorbit burn. After reentry, it will glide back to Starbase in a belly flop position, perform a landing flip maneuver, and be caught by the chopsticks on OLP-B. If something goes wrong before the catch, it will divert for a soft splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico.[15]
References
[edit]- ^ Weber, Ryan (January 29, 2025). "Following Flight 7 SpaceX line up future Starships". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved January 29, 2025.
- ^ @nasaspaceflight (January 9, 2025). "With Booster 14 (Flight 7) at the pad, Booster 12 (Flight 5, which was caught and donated a Raptor to Booster 14) has moved from the Rocket Garden and is set to enter Mega Bay 1. Oh, and there's a Ship 35 section (Flight 9) at the end of the clip!" (Tweet). Retrieved January 9, 2025 – via Twitter.
- ^ @nasaspaceflight (December 11, 2024). "Booster 16 (Flight 9) CH4 tank is out in the sun at the Production Site, and a new tank is being lifted at the launch site" (Tweet). Retrieved December 11, 2024 – via Twitter.
- ^ Weber, Ryan (January 29, 2025). "Following Flight 7 SpaceX line up future Starships". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved January 29, 2025.
- ^ Dunphy, Chris (January 17, 2025). "What the Failure of Starship Flight 7 Means For Starlink - V3 Satellites Coming". Mobile Internet Resource Center. Retrieved January 18, 2025.
- ^ Clark, Stephen (January 17, 2025). "Fire destroys Starship on its seventh test flight, raining debris from space". Ars Technica. Retrieved January 28, 2025.
- ^ Weber, Ryan (February 7, 2025). "Starbase making progress on second launch pad". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved February 7, 2025.
- ^ "CONACES 2024 | Conferencia: SpaceX. Ing. Kathryn Lueders". YouTube. November 7, 2024. Retrieved January 11, 2025.
- ^ NASASpaceflight (February 3, 2025). Pad B's Major Milestones: Chopsticks, Tank Farm, and Flame Trench Developments | Starbase Update. Retrieved February 4, 2025 – via YouTube.
- ^ NASASpaceflight (December 11, 2024). Primed To Fire and Rolled Back | SpaceX Boca Chica. Retrieved January 24, 2025 – via YouTube.
- ^ NASASpaceflight (January 28, 2025). From Pad A Repairs to Pad B's Chopsticks: A Week at Starbase | Starbase Update. Retrieved January 29, 2025 – via YouTube.
- ^ Weber, Ryan (January 29, 2025). "Following Flight 7 SpaceX line up future Starships". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved January 29, 2025.
- ^ "SpaceX Version 3 Starship and Version 3 Starlink Both Arrive in 2025 | NextBigFuture.com". February 2, 2025. Retrieved February 11, 2025.
- ^ Jax (December 26, 2024). "It's Electrifying: Starship's Upgraded Payload Deployment System". Ringwatchers. Retrieved February 11, 2025.
- ^ Weber, Ryan (January 29, 2025). "Following Flight 7 SpaceX line up future Starships". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved February 11, 2025.
- Draft articles on transportation
- Draft articles on space
- Draft articles on technology
- AfC submissions on other topics
- Pending AfC submissions
- AfC pending submissions by age/8 days ago
- AfC submissions with the same name as existing articles
- AfC submissions by date/10 February 2025
- AfC submissions by date/29 January 2025