This page is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Futures studies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Futures studies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Futures studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Futures studiesTemplate:WikiProject Futures studiesfutures studies
I removed the unnecessary historical context in the "Easy nukes" section. All the remaining sources are covering the vulnerable world hypothesis, and what remains should be close to what you can find in the references. If you think there are still aspects that need to be modified, please provide some details.
Alenoach (talk) 14:59, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I added more references. Now, out of the 14 references, 12 are from secondary sources (all except the original paper and the Wired interview) and 12 are primarily about the Vulnerable World Hypothesis (I would say all except the ones from Nautilus and Axios, that only have a paragraph on the Vulnerable World Hypothesis). The content that comes most often and that overlaps between multiple sources is usually inspired from the original article and tends to follow the same framing. But I think 11 out of the 14 references (all source except the original paper, the Wired interview and the Aeon article) are independent. I'll let you decide whether the article should overall be considered notable enough. Alenoach (talk) 23:50, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
