User talk:ToadetteEdit

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

This is ToadetteEdit's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10: 7 days

Request on 00:08:30, 18 May 2025 for assistance on AfC submission by ElPython

ElPython (talk · contribs)
- Draft:National Forensic Association National Championship Tournament (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, you recently denied my draft based on the sources, and I was curious which sources were the issue here? I took a similar approach to this article as other speech and debate topics so I am curious where I went wrong.

ElPython (talk) 00:08, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ElPython, I have a concern about this draft. Of the sources in the draft, four of them are primary sources, one appears to not discuss about the tournament itself, and one is not yet indepth enough. Sources should be a primary and independent sources that should discuss the subject in some depth. ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 05:52, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cc @Timtrent: for the recent comment at WP:AFCHD related to this thread. ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 11:25, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Revolutionary Communist Party (UK, 2024)

Good evening,

Please could I ask you to reconsider your decision to accept the aforementioned article as meeting acceptance for creation. I've just gone through the material added by what I suspect to be a SPA user who submitted it for review, and the majority of the material they added looks to have been an attempt game the system. I've removed the questionable material (namely sources in contravention of WP:ABOUTSELF, WP:PRSOURCE, WP:OVERCITE, and even an instance of claiming mention in a source from half a year before the organisation existed).

As a result I believe it still does not meet criteria for mainspace and therefore should be moved back to draft.

Regards, Rambling Rambler (talk) 00:04, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Rambling Rambler, I will rereview the draft shortly. ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 07:07, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So to round up:

The article is now in the mainspace after a technical move request that I filed(?). It has since been marked as reviewed, and maintenance tags have been added.
I can clearly see the changes that you made. Currently, I see this source as contributing to notability, nothing more, nothing less in the current page. Previously, there were three sources that I believed would contribute to notability.

As I feel that the subject might as well not contribute to notability, and that I feel that draftification is not appropriate in this case, I will start a deletion discussion about the subject. ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 07:19, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Resilient Barnstar
	Happy editing and have a great day :) it's lio! \| talk \| work 11:33, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HKLionel, and you too! :) ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 12:40, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]