Jump to content

Ancient Greek mathematics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Hellenistic mathematics)

An illustration of Euclid's proof of the Pythagorean theorem

Ancient Greek mathematics refers to the historical development of mathematical ideas and texts in Ancient Greece during Classical and Late antiquity, mostly from the 5th century BC to the 6th century AD.[1][2] Greek mathematicians lived in cities spread around the shores of the Mediterranean, from Anatolia to Italy and North Africa, but were united by Hellenistic culture and the Ancient Greek language.[3] The development of mathematics as a theoretical discipline and the use of deductive reasoning in proofs is an important difference between Greek mathematics and those of preceding civilizations, such as Ancient Egypt and Babylonia.[4][5]

The early history of Greek mathematics is obscure; traditional ascriptions of basic mathematical theorems to legendary sages such as Thales or Pythagoras are much later inventions. By the beginning of the 5th century BC, there are traces of written treatises on mathematics, which developed further in the 4th century BC at institutions such as the Platonic academy. These early mathematical discoveries were compiled in the Hellenistic period by Euclid of Alexandria at the beginning of the third century in his Elements, our earliest complete text on the subject that is now referred to as Euclidean geometry. The 3rd century BC saw further developments in geometry and mechanics by Archimedes, many of whose writings survive, and the development of a theory of conic sections as preserved in the works of Apollonius of Perga. Ancient Greek mathematics encompassed not only on disciplines traditionally included in modern mathematics, such as geometry and arithmetic, but also astronomy and music. Ancient Greek astronomers such as Hipparchus and Ptolemy developed trigonometry to determine the positions of stars in the sky, while Nicomachus and other ancient music theorists developed a theory of harmonics. In the Roman period, Diophantus Arithmetica outlined a theory for the solution of Diophantine equations that would later be developed in the medieval Islamic world into algebra. In the 4th century, Pappus of Alexandria wrote his Collection, summarizing the work of his predecessors, much of which is now lost, documenting the history of attempts to solve problems such as squaring the circle, angle trisection, or doubling the cube using only a straight edge and compass, Theon of Alexandria, and his daughter Hypatia wrote commentaries on the works of earlier mathematicians, including Ptolemy and Diophantus. Later commentators in the 6th century such as Eutocius of Ascalon also wrote commentaries on the works of Apollonius and Archimedes.

The works of Ancient Greek mathematics were copied in the medieval Byzantine period and translated into Arabic and Latin, where they exerted influence on mathematics in the Islamic world and in Medieval Europe. During the Renaissance, the texts of Euclid, Archimedes, Apollonius, and Pappus went on to influence the development of early modern mathematicians including Fermat and Descartes, who created number theory and analytic geometry based on their studies of Greek mathematical texts. Many of the problems of Ancient Greek mathematics were only solved in the modern era, by mathematicians such as Gauss. Attempts to derive geometry without Euclid's parallel line postulate spurred the development of non-Euclidean geometry.

Overview

[edit]

The term "mathematics" Ancient Greek: μαθηματικός derives from the Ancient Greek: μάθημα, romanizedmáthēma, Attic Greek: [má.tʰɛː.ma] Koinē Greek: [ˈma.θi.ma], from the verb manthano, "I learn". Strictly speaking, a máthēma could be any branch of learning, or anything learnt; however, since antiquity certain mathēmata associated with what would later become the Medieval quadrivium were granted special status: arithmetic, geometry, astronomy, and harmonics.[6][7] Arithmetic, which dealt with numbers, included not only basic operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division, but also what we would now consider algebra and number theory. Geometry, from the Ancient Greek for "land mensuration" included not only plane and solid geometry and the theory of conic sections, but also optics.[8] Astronomy fostered the development of trigonometry, particularly as geocentric models of the solar system needed to incorporate increasingly complicated epicycles to explain the location of planets in the sky. Harmonics deals primarily with music theory.

Origins

[edit]
Pythagoras with a tablet of ratios, detail from The School of Athens by Raphael (1509). Although traditionally credited with the development of the Pythagorean theorem, modern historians consider it unlikely that Pythagoras made any mathematical discoveries.

The origins of Greek mathematics are not well documented.[9][10] The earliest known written treatises on Ancient Greek mathematics, beginning with Hippocrates of Chios in the 5th century BC,[11] have been lost, and the history of mathematics in the 5th and 4th centuries must be reconstructed from information was passed down through later authors, beginning in the mid-4th century BC.[12] Much of the knowledge about ancient Greek mathematics in this period is thanks to records referenced by Aristotle in his own works, [13] and also to Eudemus of Rhodes, one of Aristotle's students, who wrote a history of geometry that was quoted by many later authors and provides a near-contemporary account for many of the mathematicians of the 4th century.[14] Additionally, the Elements of Euclid, which was written near the end of the 4th century BC, is a compilation of the work of the mathematicians from these centuries, and contains many theorems that are attributed to them.[15]

Egyptian and Babylonian mathematics

[edit]

The earliest advanced civilizations in Greece were the Minoan and later Mycenaean (1500-1200 BC) civilizations, both of which flourished during the 2nd millennium BC. While these civilizations possessed writing, and many Linear B documents written in Mycenaean Greek have been translated have been translated, no mathematical writings have yet been discovered.[16] After the Bronze Age collapse, the subsequent Greek dark ages saw a significant population decline and loss of writing, which would not re-emerge until the 7th century BC, using an entirely new writing system derived from the Phoenician alphabet, written on papyrus from Ancient Egyptian scribal culture.[17]

However, mathematical writings from other Mediterranean Bronze Age civilizations are extant, in the form of Babylonian cuneiform tablets and Egyptian mathematical papyri.[18] Though no direct evidence of transmission is available, it is generally thought that Babylonian and Egyptian mathematics in the Bronze Age had an influence on the younger Greek tradition,[18] likely through an oral transmission of problems over the course of centuries rather than any direct contact.[19] Unlike later Greek mathematics, our extant records of Babylonian and Egyptian mathematics as documented in these extant texts are primarily applied in nature, focused on land mensuration and accounting; although problems in Egyptian and Babylonian scribal cultures went beyond purely utilitarian concerns, even as far as constructing artificial scenarios involving the solution of quadratic equations, they never focused on purely theoretical models.[18]

Archaic period

[edit]

Later traditions in Ancient Greece attribute the origin of mathematics in Greece to either Thales of Miletus, one of the legendary Seven Sages of Greece, or to Pythagoras of Samos, both of whom are said to have visited Egypt and Babylon and learned mathematics there.[13] Thales is further credited with predicting a solar eclipse in 585 BC. However, modern scholarship tends to be skeptical of such claims;[20] neither Pythagoras or Thales left any writings behind that were available in the Classical period, and the widespread literacy and scribal culture that would have supported the transmission of written mathematical treatises from their time period did not develop until the 5th century; the oral literature of the time period was primarily focused on public speeches and recitations of poetry.[21] The standard view among historians of mathematics is that neither Thales or Pythagoras did any mathematics, and that the discoveries they were credited with, such as Thales' Theorem, the Pythagorean theorem, and the Platonic solids, were attributed to them by much later authors.[20]

Earliest writings

[edit]
The Lune of Hippocrates, one of the earliest documented results in Ancient Greek mathematics, was developed by Hippocrates of Chios in the late-5th century BC in an attempt to Square the circle. The shaded portion in the upper left is the same area as the shaded part of the triangle.

While Ancient Greek literature in the Archaic period was primarily orally transmitted, the earliest traces of Greek mathematicians who wrote dedicated mathematical treatises do not appear until the second half of the fifth century BC.[11] According to Eudemus,[22] Hippocrates of Chios was the first known author to write a book of Elements in the tradition later continued by Euclid.[23] Hippocrates wrote a now lost mathematical treatise that is described by Eudemus[24] which provides a description of the Lune of Hippocrates. According to the testimony of Eudemus, Hippocrates studied an astronomer named Oenopides, also from Chios. Although the remainder of the writings of these mathematicians are lost, later mathematicians associated with Chios include Andron and Zenodotus, who may be associated with a "school of Oenopides" mentioned by Proclus.[11]

Some of the later Pythagoreans who lived in the 5th century may have made significant contributions to mathematics. Aristotle, one of the earliest authors to associate Pythagoreanism with mathematics, even refused to attribute anything specifically to Pythagoras, who he seems to have regarded as a fictional person,[25] and only discussed the work of the Pythagoreans as a group.[26][27] Early traditions about the Pythagoreans discuss a taboo on publishing their doctrines; many of the stories of early Pythagoreans are apocryphal, including stories that Hippasus was drowned for publishing the discovery of the dodecagon, or that another Pythagorean philosopher was exiled for sharing the discovery of irrational numbers.[28] However, more concrete accounts of mathematical work start to appear beginning with Philolaus of Croton, who associated together arithmetic, geometry, astronomy, and harmonics. Fragments of Philolaus' work are preserved in quotations from later authors.[28]

In the 5th century BC, many other philosophers also made claims about mathematics that have been recorded; Antiphon claimed to be able to construct a rectilinear figure with the same area as a given circle, while Hippias is credited with a method for squaring a circle with a neusis construction. Protagoras and Democritus debated the tangency of a line with a circle; Protagoras argued that it was impossible for a line to intersect a circle at a single point, whereas Democritus stated that this was impossible. Democritus also asserted, apparently without proof, that the area of a cone was 1/3 the area of a cylinder with the same base, a result which was later proved by Eudoxus of Cnidus.[11]

Mathematics in Plato's academy

[edit]
Archytas, a pythagorean philosopher who was a friend of Plato, is credited with many early discoveries in Ancient Greek mathematics

While Plato was not a mathematician himself, numerous early mathematicians, including Archytas, Theaetetus, and Eudoxus, were associated with Plato's academy, and Plato mentions mathematics in several of his dialogues, including the Meno, the Theaetetus, the Republic, and the Timaeus.[29]

Archytas, a Pythagorean philosopher from Tarentum, was a friend of Plato who made several mathematical discoveries.[28] Archytas is often credited with books VII to IX in the Elements, which deal with the Euclidean algorithm, prime numbers, mean ratios, and perfect numbers.[28] Archytas solved the problem of doubling the cube, now known to be impossible with only a compass and a straightedge, with an alternative method,[28] systematized the Pythagorean means, and made contributions to optics and mechanics.[28][30]

Theaetetus, who figures as a character in the Platonic dialogue named after him, where he is working on a problem given to him by Theodorus of Cyrene to demonstrate that the square roots of several numbers from 3 to 17 are irrational, a construction now known as the Spiral of Theodorus. Theaetetus is traditionally credited with much of the work contained in Books X of Euclid's Elements, concerned with incommensurable magnitudes, Book XIII, which outlines the construction of the regular polyhedra. Although some of the regular polyhedra were certainly known prior to Theaetetus, he is credited with the systematic construction of them, and the proof that only five of them exist.[31][32]

Another mathematician associated with Plato's academy is Eudoxus of Cnidus, developed a theory of proportion in book V of the Elements. Archimedes also credits Eudoxus of Cnidus with two propositions in book XII of Euclid's Elements, proving that the volume of a cone is one-third the volume of a cylinder with the same base, which use an early form of calculus known as the method of exhaustion.[33] This method is also used by Archimedes himself in order to find an approximation to π (Measurement of the Circle) and to prove that the area enclosed by a parabola and a straight line is 4/3 times the area of a triangle with equal base and height (Quadrature of the Parabola).[33] Eudoxus also developed an astronomical calendar, now lost, that remains partially preserved by an imitation in poetic form called Phaenomena by Aratus.[11] Eudoxus seems to have founded a school of mathematics in Cyzicus, where one of Eudoxus' students, Menaechmus went on to develop a theory of conic sections.[11]

Hellenistic and early Roman period

[edit]

Ancient Greek mathematics reached its acme during the Hellenistic era and early Roman periods following Alexander the Great's conquest of the Eastern Mediterranean, Egypt, Mesopotamia, the Iranian plateau, Central Asia, and parts of India, leading to the spread of the Greek language and culture across these regions. Koine Greek became the lingua franca of scholarship throughout the Hellenistic world, and the mathematics of the Classical period merged with Egyptian and Babylonian mathematics to give rise to Hellenistic mathematics,[34][35] and several centers of learning appeared during the Hellenistic period, of which the most important one was the Musaeum in Alexandria, in Ptolemaic Egypt.[8]

Although few in number, Hellenistic mathematicians actively communicated with each other via letters; who were then responsible for distributing publication consisted of passing and copying someone's work among colleagues.[8] Working at the Library of Alexandria, Euclid collected many previous mathematical results and theorems in the Elements, a compilation of many of the works of his predecessors that would become a canon of geometry and elementary number theory for many centuries.[8] Archimedes, building on the work in Elements, used the method of exhaustion to approximate Pi (Measurement of a Circle), measured the surface area and volume of a sphere (On the Sphere and Cylinder),[8] devised a mechanical method for developing solutions to mathematical problems using the law of the lever, (Method of Mechanical Theorems),[8] and a developed method for representing very large numbers in order to show that the number of grains of sand filling the universe was not uncountable.(The Sand-Reckoner),[36] Apollonius of Perga, in his extant work Conics, refined and developed the theory of conic sections first outlined by Menaechmus, Euclid, and Conon of Samos.[8] Trigonometry was developed around the time of Hipparchus, an early astronomer, [37] and both trigonometry and astronomy further developed by Ptolemy in his Almagest.

Construction problems

[edit]

Much of the extant literature on hellenistic mathematics deals with three construction problems: Doubling the Cube, Angle trisection, and Squaring the circle, all of which are now known to be impossible with only a straight edge and a compass, however, many attempts were made using neusis constructions including the Cissoid of Diocles, Quadratrix, and the Conchoid of Nicomedes.[38]

The construction of the Platonic solids, outlined in Book XIII of Euclid's elements, is often credited to Theaetetus, a mathematician who worked in Plato's academy.

The constructions regular polygons and polyhedra had already been known by the time of the publication of Euclid's elements. Archimedes extended this in a now lost work by constructing the semiregular polyhedra, also sometimes known as Archimedean solids. A work transmitted as "Book XIV" of Euclid's Elements, likely written a few centuries later by Hypsicles, provides a historical development after Theatetus; Aristaeus the Elder's comparison of five figures and Apollonius of Perga's Comparison of the Dodecahedron and the Icosahedron.[8] Another book, transmitted as "Book XV" of Euclid's elements, which was compiled in the 6th century CE, provides further developments.[8]

Many of the works on the solution of construction problems became part of a standard curriculum of works which were studied during the Hellenistic period: Data and Porisms by Euclid, several works by Apollonius of Perga including Cutting off a ratio, Cutting off an area, Determinate section, Tangencies, and Neusis, and several works dealing with loci, including Plane Loci and Conics by Apollonius, Solid Loci by Aristaeus the Elder, Loci on a Surface by Euclid, and On Means by Eratosthenes of Cyrene. All of these works other than Data, Conics Books I to VII, and Cutting off a ratio are lost. However, a rough outline of the contents of can be obtained in Book 7 of the Collection of Pappus of Alexandria, who provides brief epitomes of each of the works, along with lemmas for Cutting off an area, Determinate section, Tangencies, Porisms, Neusis, Plane Loci, and Book VIII of the Conics.[39]

The study of optics in Ancient Greece was also considered a part of geometry.[40] An extant work on Catoptrics is dubiously attributed to Euclid, Archimedes is known to have written a now lost work on catoptrics, and another work, On Burning Mirrors, by Diocles is extant in an arabic translation.[8]

Astronomy

[edit]

In the hellenistic period, the works of Babylonian astronomers became available to Ancient Greek mathematicians. Trigonometry was developed around the time of Hipparchus, who made astronomical observations and wrote extensively on trigonometry and astronomy, however, most of his works are lost.[37][41] [42]

Claudius Ptolemy compiled the observations of Hipparchus and other astronomers and wrote a work now called the Almagest explaining the motions of the stars and planets according to a geocentric model, and calculated out chord tables to a higher degree of precision than had been done previously, along with an instruction manual, Handy Tables.[43][44]

The Little Astronomy, a collection of shorter works from the Hellenistic period, mostly with astronomical relevance, have survived because they were bundled together as an astronomy curriculum beginning in the 2nd century and transmitted as a group: Theodosius's Spherics, Autolycus's On the Moving Sphere, Euclid's Optics and Phaenomena, Theodosius's On Habitations and On Days and Nights, Aristarchus's On the Sizes and Distances, Autolycus's On Risings and Settings, and Hypsicles's On Ascensions. These works are all extant in Vaticanus gr. 204, which also contains Apollonius's Conics books I-IV and the commentary by Eutocius, and Euclid's Catoptrics and his Data with an introduction by Marinus of Neapolis. This collection was translated into Arabic with a few additions such as Euclid's Data, Menelaus's Spherics (which only survives in Arabic), and various works by Archimedes as the Middle Books, intermediate between Euclid's Elements and Ptolemy's Almagest.[45][46]

Arithmetic

[edit]

Building on the works of the earlier Pythagoreans, Nicomachus of Gerasa wrote an Introduction to Arithmetic which would go on to receive later commentary in Neopythagoreanism. The continuing influence of Platonism in mathematics is shown by another extant work, Mathematics Useful For Understanding Plato, by Theon of Smyrna, written around the same time. Diophantus wrote on polygonal numbers and a work in pre-modern algebra (Arithmetica), [47][48]

Applied mathematics

[edit]

Much of the work represented by authors such as Euclid, Archimedes, Apollonius, Hipparchus, and Diophantus was of a very advanced level and rarely mastered outside a small circle.[18] Ancient Greek mathematics was not limited to theoretical works but was also used in other activities, such as business transactions and in land mensuration, as evidenced by extant texts where computational procedures and practical considerations took more of a central role.[18] Examples of applied mathematics around this time include the construction of analogue computers like the Antikythera mechanism,[49][50] the accurate measurement of the circumference of the Earth by Eratosthenes, and the mathematical and mechanical works of Heron.[51]

Mathematics in late antiquity

[edit]

The mathematicians in the later Roman era from the 4th century onward generally had few notable original works, however, they are distinguished for their commentaries and expositions on the works of earlier mathematicians. These commentaries have preserved valuable extracts from works which have perished, or historical allusions which, in the absence of original documents, are precious because of their rarity.[52]

Pappus' Collection

[edit]

Pappus of Alexandria compiled a canon of results of earlier mathematics in the Collection in eight books, of which part of book II and books III through VII are extant in Greek and book VIII is extant in Arabic. The collection attempts to sum up the whole of Ancient Greek mathematics up to that time as interpreted by Pappus: Book III is framed as a letter to Pandrosion, a mathematican in Athens, and discusses three construction problems and attempts to solve them: Doubling the Cube, Angle trisection, and Squaring the Circle. Book IV discusses classical geometry, which Pappus divides into plane geometry, Line geometry, and Solid geometry, and includes a discussion of Archimedes' construction of the Arbelos, otherwise only known via a Pseudo-archimedean work, Book of Lemmas. Book V discusses isoperimetric figures, summarizing otherwise lost works by Zenodotus and Archimedes on isoperimetric plane figures and solid figures, respectively. Book VI deals with astronomy, providing commentary on some of the works of the Little Astronomy corpus. Book VII deals with analysis, providing epitomes and lemmas from otherwise lost works. Book VIII deals with mechanics. The Greek version breaks off in the middle of a sentence discussing Hero of Alexandria, but a complete edition of the book survives in Arabic.[53]

Commentaries

[edit]

The commentary tradition, which had begun during the Hellenistic period, continued into late antiquity. The first known commentary on the Elements was written by Hero of Alexandria, who likely set the format for future commentaries. Serenus of Antinoöpolis wrote a lost commentary on the Conics of Apollonius, along with two works that survive, Section of a Cylinder and Section of a Cone, expanding on specific subjects in the Conics.[54] Pappus wrote a commentary on Book X of the elements, dealing with incommensurable magnitudes. Heliodorus of Larissa wrote a summary of the Optics.[11]

Many of the late antique commentators were associated with Neoplatonist philosophy; Porphyry of Tyre, a student of Plotinus, the founder of Neoplatonism, wrote a commentary on Ptolemy's Harmonics. Iamblichus, who was himself a student of Porphyry, wrote a commentary on Nicomachus' Introduction to Arithmetic. In Alexandria in the 4th century, Theon of Alexandria wrote commentaries on the writings of Ptolemy, including a commentary on the Almagest and two commentaries on the Handy Tables, one of which is more of an instruction manual ("Little Commentary"), and another with a much more detailed exposition and derivations ("Great Commentary"). Hypatia, Theon's daughter, also wrote a commentary on Diophantus' Arithmetica and a commentary on the Conics of Apollonius, which have not survived.[55]

In the 5th century, in Athens, Proclus wrote a commentary on Euclid's elements, which the first book survives. Proclus' contemporary, Domninus of Larissa, wrote a summary of Nicomachus' Introduction to Arithmetic, while Marinus of Neapolis, Proclus' successor, wrote an Introduction to Euclid's Data. Meanwhile in Alexandria, Ammonius Hermiae, John Philoponus and Simplicius of Cilicia wrote commentaries on the works of Aristotle that preserve information on earlier mathematicians and philosophers. Eutocius of Ascalon,(c. 480–540 AD) another student of Ammonius, wrote commentaries that are extant on Apollonius' Conics along with some treatises of Archimedes: On the Sphere and Cylinder, Measurement of a Circle, and On Balancing Planes (though the authorship of the last one is disputed).[56] In Rome, Boethius, seeking to preserve Ancient Greek philosophical, translated works on the quadrivium into Latin, deriving much of his work on Arithmetic and Harmonics from Nicomachus.[57]

After the closure of the Neoplatonic schools by the emperor Justinian in 529 AD, the institution of mathematics as a formal enterprise entered a decline. However, two mathematicians connected to the Neoplatonic tradition were commissioned to build the Hagia Sophia: Anthemius of Tralles and Isidore of Miletus. Anthemius constructed many advanced mechanisms and wrote a work On Surprising Mechanisms which treats "burning mirrors" and skeptically attempts to explain the function of Archimedes' heat ray. Isidore, who continued the project of the Hagia Sophia after Anthemius' death, also supervised the revision of Eutocius' commentaries of Archimedes. From someone in Isidore's circle we also have a work on polyhedra that is transmitted pseudepigraphically as Book XV of Euclid's Elements.[58]

Reception and legacy

[edit]
A papyrus fragment (P. Oxy. 29) from Euclid's Elements Book II, dated to approximately 100 AD.

The majority of mathematical treatises written in Ancient Greek, along with the discoveries made within them, have been lost; around 30% of the works known from references to them are extant.[59] Authors whose works survive in Greek manuscripts include: Euclid, Autolycus of Pitane, Archimedes, Aristarchus of Samos, Philo of Byzantium, Biton of Pergamon, Apollonius of Perga, Hipparchus, Theodosius of Bithynia, Hypsicles, Athenaeus Mechanicus, Geminus, Hero of Alexandria, Apollodorus of Damascus, Theon of Smyrna, Cleomedes, Nicomachus, Ptolemy, Cleonides, Gaudentius, Anatolius of Laodicea, Aristides Quintilian, Porphyry, Diophantus, Alypius, Heliodorus of Larissa, Pappus of Alexandria, Serenus of Antinoöpolis, Theon of Alexandria, Proclus, Marinus of Neapolis, Domninus of Larissa, Anthemius of Tralles, and Eutocius.

The earliest surviving papyrus to record a Greek mathematical text is P. Hib. i 27, which contains a parapegma of Eudoxus' astronomical calendar, along with several ostraca from the 3rd century BC that deal with propositions XIII.10 and XIII.16 of Euclid's Elements.[60] A papyrus recovered from Herculaneum[61] contains an essay by the Epicurean philosopher Demetrius Lacon on Euclid's Elements.[62]

Most of the oldest extant manuscripts for each text date from the 9th century onward, copies of works written during and before the Hellenistic period.[63] The two major sources of manuscripts are Byzantine-era codices, copied some 500 to 1500 years after their originals, and Arabic translations of Greek works; what has survived reflects the preferences of readers in late antiquity along with the interests of mathematicians in the Byzantine empire and the medieval Islamic world who preserved and copied them.[18]

Despite the lack of original manuscripts, the dates for some Greek mathematicians are more certain than the dates of surviving Babylonian or Egyptian sources because a number of overlapping chronologies exist, though many dates remain uncertain.

Byzantine mathematics

[edit]

With the closure of the Neoplatonist schools in the 6th century, Greek mathematics declined in the medieval Byzantine period, although many works were preserved in medieval manuscript transmission and translated into first Syriac and Arabic, and later into Latin.[11] The transition to miniscule manuscript in the 9th century, however, many works that were not copied during this time period were lost, although a few uncial manuscripts do survive. Many surviving works are derived from only a single manuscript; such as Pappus' Collection and Books I-IV of the Conics.[8] Many of the surviving manuscripts originate from two scholars in this period in the circle of Photios I, Leo the Mathematician and Arethas of Caesarea. Scholia written in the margins of Euclid's elements that have been copied throughout multiple extant manuscripts that were also written by Arethas, derived from Proclus' commentary along with many commentaries on Euclid which are now lost. The works of Archimedes survived in three different recensions in manuscripts from the 9th and 10th centuries; two of which are now lost after being copied, the third of which, the Archimedes Palimpsest, was only rediscovered in 1906.[11]

In the later Byzantine period, George Pachymeres wrote a summary of the quadrivium, and Maximus Planudes wrote scholia on the first two books of Diophantus.[11]

Medieval Islamic mathematics

[edit]

Numerous mathematical treatises were translated into Arabic in the 9th century; many works that are only extent today in Arabic translation, and there is evidence for several more that have since been lost.[64][65]

Medieval Islamic scientists such as Alhazen developed the ideas of the Ancient Greek geometry into advanced theories in optics and astronomy, and Diophantus' Arithmetica was synthezied with the works of Al-Khwarizmi and works from Indian mathematics to develop a theory of algebra.[11]

The following works are extant only in Arabic translations:[66]

  • Apollonius, Conics books V to VII, Cutting Off of a Ratio
  • Archimedes, Book of Lemmas
  • Diocles, On Burning Mirrors
  • Diophantus, Arithmetica books IV to VII
  • Euclid, On Divisions of Figures, On Weights
  • Menelaus, Sphaerica
  • Hero, Catoptrica, Mechanica
  • Pappus, Commentary on Euclid's Elements book X, Collection Book VIII
  • Ptolemy, Planisphaerium,

Additionally, the work Optics by Ptolemy only survives in a Latin translations of the Arabic translation of a Greek original.

In Latin Medieval Europe

[edit]
Cover of Diophantus' Arithmetica in Latin

The works derived from Ancient Greek mathematical writings that had been written in late antiquity by Boethius and Martianus Capella had formed the basis of early medieval quadrivium of arithmetic, geometry, astronomy, and music. In the 12th century the original works of Ancient Greek mathematics were translated into Latin first from Arabic by Gerard of Cremona, and then from the original Greek a century later by William of Moerbeke.[11]

Renaissance

[edit]

The publication of Greek mathematical works increased their audience; Pappus's collection was published in 1588, Diophantus in 1621. Diophantus would go on to influence Pierre de Fermat's work on number theory; Fermat scribbled his famous note about Fermat's Last theorem in his copy of Arithmetica. Descartes, working through the Problem of Apollonius from his edition of Pappus, proved what is now called Descartes' theorem and laid the foundations for Analytic geometry.[11]

Modern mathematics

[edit]

Ancient Greek mathematics constitutes an important period in the history of mathematics: fundamental in respect of geometry and for the idea of formal proof.[67] Greek mathematicians also contributed to number theory, mathematical astronomy, combinatorics, mathematical physics, and, at times, approached ideas close to the integral calculus.[68] [69]

Richard Dedekind acknowledged Eudoxus's theory of proportion as an inspiration for the Dedekind cut, a method of contructing the real numbers.[70]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Sidoli, Nathan (2020), Taub, Liba (ed.), "Ancient Greek Mathematics" (PDF), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek and Roman Science: 190–191, doi:10.1017/9781316136096.010, ISBN 978-1-316-13609-6
  2. ^ Netz, Reviel (2002), "Greek mathematics: A group picture.", Science and Mathematics in Ancient Greek Culture, pp. 196–216, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198152484.003.0011, ISBN 978-0-19-815248-4
  3. ^ Boyer 1991, p. 48.
  4. ^ Knorr, W. (2000), Mathematics, Greek Thought: A Guide to Classical Knowledge: Harvard University Press, pp. 386–413
  5. ^ Schiefsky, Mark (2012-07-20), "The Creation of Second-Order Knowledge in Ancient Greek Science as a Process in the Globalization of Knowledge", The Globalization of Knowledge in History, MPRL – Studies, Berlin: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften, ISBN 978-3-945561-23-2
  6. ^ Heath (1931), "A Manual of Greek Mathematics", Nature, 128 (3235): 5, Bibcode:1931Natur.128..739T, doi:10.1038/128739a0
  7. ^ Furner, J. (2020), "Classification of the sciences in Greco-Roman antiquity", www.isko.org, retrieved 2023-01-09
  8. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Acerbi 2018.
  9. ^ Hodgkin, Luke (2005), "Greeks and origins", A History of Mathematics: From Mesopotamia to Modernity, Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-852937-8
  10. ^ Knorr, W. (1981), On the early history of axiomatics: The interaction of mathematics and philosophy in Greek Antiquity., D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 145–186 Theory Change, Ancient Axiomatics, and Galileo's Methodology, Vol. 1
  11. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Netz 2022.
  12. ^ Boyer 1991, pp. 40–89.
  13. ^ a b Boyer 1991, pp. 43–61.
  14. ^ Netz 2022, pp. 89–90.
  15. ^ Netz 2022, pp. 120–121.
  16. ^ Netz 2022, p. 13.
  17. ^ Netz 2022, pp. 14–15.
  18. ^ a b c d e f Høyrup 1990.
  19. ^ Netz 2022, pp. 25–26.
  20. ^ a b Netz 2022, pp. 16–17.
  21. ^ Netz 2022, pp. 17–19.
  22. ^ s.v. Proclus, Commentary on Euclid's Elements
  23. ^ Fowler 1999, pp. 382–383.
  24. ^ s.v. Simplicius of Cilicia, Commentary on Aristotle's Physics
  25. ^ Tredennick, Hugh (1923), Aristotle The Metaphysics, Heinemann, p. 66, retrieved 27 April 2025
  26. ^ Cornelli, Gabriele (2016-05-20), "A review of Aristotle's claim regarding Pythagoreans fundamental Beliefs: All is number?", Filosofia Unisinos, 17 (1): 50–57, doi:10.4013/fsu.2016.171.06
  27. ^ Hans-Joachim Waschkies, "Introduction" to "Part 1: The Beginning of Greek Mathematics" in Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics, pp. 11–12
  28. ^ a b c d e f Netz 2014.
  29. ^ Fowler 1999.
  30. ^ Burnyeat, M. F. (2005), "Archytas and Optics", Science in Context, 18 (1): 35–53, doi:10.1017/S0269889705000347 (inactive 16 December 2024){{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of December 2024 (link)
  31. ^ Elements Book XIII, Proposition 18
  32. ^ Acerbi 2018, pp. 277–278.
  33. ^ a b Acerbi 2018, p. 279.
  34. ^ Green, P. (1990), Alexander to Actium: The Historical Evolution of the Hellenistic Age (1 ed.), University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-08349-3, JSTOR 10.1525/j.ctt130jt89
  35. ^ Russo, L. (2004), "Hellenistic Mathematics", The Forgotten Revolution: How Science Was Born in 300 BC and Why It Had to Be Reborn, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 31–55, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18904-3_3, ISBN 978-3-642-18904-3
  36. ^ Reviel Netz (2003), "The Goal of Archimedes' Sand Reckoner", Apeiron, 36 (4): 251–290, doi:10.1515/APEIRON.2003.36.4.251
  37. ^ a b Toomer, G. J. (1974), "The Chord Table of Hipparchus and the Early History of Greek Trigonometry", Centaurus, 18 (1): 6–28, doi:10.1111/j.1600-0498.1974.tb00205.x
  38. ^ Knorr 1986.
  39. ^ Pappus, of Alexandria (1986), Book 7 of the Collection, New York : Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-96257-3, retrieved 4 May 2025
  40. ^ Acerbi 2018, pp. 281–282.
  41. ^ Duke, D. (2011), "The very early history of trigonometry." (PDF), DIO: The International Journal of Scientific History, 17: 34–42
  42. ^ Jones, A. (1994), "Greek mathematics to AD 300", Companion Encyclopedia of the History and Philosophy of the Mathematical Sciences: Volume One, pp. 46–57, retrieved 2021-05-26
  43. ^ Lambrou, M. (2003), "Theon of Alexandria and Hypatia", History of the Ancient World, retrieved 2021-05-26
  44. ^ Tihon (2011), Ptolemaiou Procheiroi Kanones. Ptolemy's Handy Tables. Volume 1b: Tables A1-A2. Transcription and Commentary, Peeters, ISBN 978-2-7584-0117-9
  45. ^ Acerbi 2018, pp. 284–285.
  46. ^ Evans, James (1998), The History & Practice of Ancient Astronomy, Oxford University Press, "The Little Astronomy", pp. 89–91, ISBN 0-19-509539-1
    Roughan, Christine (2023), The Little Astronomy and Middle Books between the 2nd and 13th Centuries CE: Transmissions of Astronomical Curricula (PhD thesis), New York University
  47. ^ Acerbi, F. (2011), "Completing Diophantus, De polygonis numeris, prop. 5", Historia Mathematica, 38 (4): 548–560, doi:10.1016/j.hm.2011.05.002
  48. ^ Christianidis, J.; Oaks, J. (2013), "Practicing algebra in late antiquity: The problem-solving of Diophantus of Alexandria", Historia Mathematica, 40 (2): 127–163, doi:10.1016/j.hm.2012.09.001
  49. ^ Tybjerg, Karin (2004-12-01), "Hero of Alexandria's Mechanical Geometry", Apeiron, 37 (4): 29–56, doi:10.1515/APEIRON.2004.37.4.29
  50. ^ Edmunds, M. G. (2014-10-02), "The Antikythera mechanism and the mechanical universe", Contemporary Physics, 55 (4): 263–285, doi:10.1080/00107514.2014.927280
  51. ^ Russo, Lucio (2004). The Forgotten Revolution. Berlin: Springer. pp. 273–277.
  52. ^ Mansfeld 2016.
  53. ^ Pappus, of Alexandria (1986), Book 7 of the Collection, New York : Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-96257-3, retrieved 4 May 2025
  54. ^ Acerbi 2018, p. 274.
  55. ^ Cameron 1990.
  56. ^ Netz 2022, pp. 427–428.
  57. ^ Netz 2022, pp. 429–430.
  58. ^ Netz 2022, pp. 432–433.
  59. ^ Acerbi, Fabio; Masià, Ramon (30 June 2022), "The Greek Mathematical Corpus: a Quantitative Appraisal", Histoire & mesure, XXXVII (1): 15–36, doi:10.4000/histoiremesure.15779
  60. ^ Fowler 1999, pp. 209.
  61. ^ P. Herc. 1061
  62. ^ Fowler 1999, pp. 210.
  63. ^ J J O'Connor and E F Robertson (October 1999), "How do we know about Greek mathematics?", The MacTutor History of Mathematics archive, University of St. Andrews, archived from the original on 30 January 2000, retrieved 18 April 2011
  64. ^ Lorch, Richard (June 2001), "Greek-Arabic-Latin: The Transmission of Mathematical Texts in the Middle Ages", Science in Context, 14 (1–2): 313–331, doi:10.1017/S0269889701000114
  65. ^ Toomer, G. J. (January 1984), "Lost greek mathematical works in arabic translation", The Mathematical Intelligencer, 6 (2): 32–38, doi:10.1007/BF03024153
  66. ^ Høyrup 1990, pp. 1–2.
  67. ^ Grant, H.; Kleiner, I. (2015), "Axiomatics—Euclid's and Hilbert's: From Material to Formal", Turning Points in the History of Mathematics, Compact Textbooks in Mathematics, Springer, pp. 1–8, doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3264-1_1, ISBN 978-1-4939-3264-1
  68. ^ Knorr 1996, pp. 67–88.
  69. ^ Powers, J. (2020). Did Archimedes do calculus? History of Mathematics Special Interest Group of the MAA [1]
  70. ^ Stein, Howard (1990), "Eudoxos and Dedekind: On the ancient Greek theory of ratios and its relation to modern mathematics", Synthese, 84 (2): 163–211, doi:10.1007/BF00485377

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
  • A. Barker, Porphyry’s Commentary on Ptolemy’s Harmonics
  • A. Barker, Greek Musical Writings, Vol. 2: Harmonic and Acoustic Theory
  • A. Bernard, “Ancient Rhetoric and Greek Mathematics: A Response to a Modern Historiographical Dilemma,”
  • I. Bodnár, Oenopides of Chius: A Survey of the Modern Literature with a Collection of the Ancient Testimonia
  • Burton, David M. (1997), The History of Mathematics: An Introduction (3rd ed.), The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., ISBN 978-0-07-009465-9
  • M. F. Burnyeat, “Plato on Why Mathematics Is Good for the Soul,” Proceedings of the British Academy 2000
  • M. F. Burnyeat, “The Philosophical Sense of Theaetetus’ Mathematics,” 1978
  • L. Corry, A Brief History of Number
  • S. Cuomo, Pappus of Alexandria and the Mathematics of Late Antiquity
  • Christianidis, Jean, ed. (2004), Classics in the History of Greek Mathematics, Dordrecht: Kluwer, ISBN 978-1-4020-0081-2
  • Cooke, Roger (1997), The History of Mathematics: A Brief Course, Wiley-Interscience, ISBN 978-0-471-18082-1
  • Derbyshire, John (2006), Unknown Quantity: A Real And Imaginary History of Algebra, Joseph Henry Press, ISBN 978-0-309-09657-7
  • E. J. Dijksterhuis, Archimedes
  • M. N. Fried, and S. Unguru, Apollonius of Perga’s Conica: Text, Context, Subtext
  • Heath, Thomas Little (1981) [First published 1921], A History of Greek Mathematics, Dover publications, ISBN 978-0-486-24073-2
  • Heath, Thomas Little (2003) [First published 1931], A Manual of Greek Mathematics, Dover publications, ISBN 978-0-486-43231-1
  • Huffman, Archytas
  • Huffman, Philolaus
  • A. Jones, A Portable Cosmos
  • R. W. Knorr, The Evolution of the Euclidean Elements, 1975
  • H. Mendell, “Reflections on Eudoxus, Callippus and Their Curves: Hippopedes and Callippopedes,”
  • I. Mueller, Philosophy of Mathematics and Deductive Structure in Euclid’s Elements
  • Netz, “Eudemus of Rhodes, Hippocrates of Chios and the Earliest Form of a Greek Mathematical Text,”
  • R. Netz, Ludic Proof: Greek Mathematics and the Alexandrian Aesthetics
  • R. Netz, The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics
  • O. Pedersen, A Survey of the Almagest: With Annotation and New Commentary by Alexander Jones
  • D. N. Sedley, “Epicurus and the Mathematicians of Cyzicus,”
  • M. Sialaros, J. Christianidis, and A. Megremi (eds.), “On Mathemata: Commenting on Greek and Arabic Mathematical Texts,”
  • Sing, Robert; Berkel, Tazuko Angela van; Osborne, Robin (2022), Numbers and numeracy in the Greek polis, Brill, ISBN 978-90-04-46721-7
  • Stillwell, John (2004), Mathematics and its History (2nd ed.), Springer Science + Business Media Inc., ISBN 978-0-387-95336-6
  • Szabó, Árpád; Szabó, Árpád (1978), The Beginnings of Greek Mathematics, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, ISBN 978-963-05-1416-3
  • S. Unguru, “On the Need to Rewrite the History of Greek Mathematics,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 15 (1975): 67-114
  • G. Vlastos, “Elenchus and Mathematics: A Turning-Point in Plato’s Philosophical Development,”
  • I. Yavetz, “On the Homocentric Spheres of Eudoxus,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences
[edit]