Librostoma
| Librostoma Temporal range:
| |
|---|---|
| |
| Asaphus lepidurus | |
Scientific classification 
| |
| Domain: | Eukaryota |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Arthropoda |
| Class: | †Trilobita |
| Subclass: | †Librostoma Fortey, 1990[1] |
| Orders | |
| |
Librostoma is a subclass of trilobites defined by having a natant hypostome, which is a hypostome (mineralized trilobite mouthpart) that is free from the anterior doublure and aligned with the anterior of the glabella,[4] this is unlike a conterminant hypostome, which is attached to the exoskeleton.[5]
They are a large and long lasting group, with some of the candidates for the first trilobites being librostomes in the order ptychopariida; and all post-Devonian[b]trilobites being in the order proetida, who are librostomes.
Some librostomes may not even be within the group, with Whittington (2003) placing some genera (Hemibarrandia, Lakaspis, Peraspis and Symphysurina) of the asaphid family Nileidae in the order Corynexochida.[6]
Taxonomy
[edit]-
-
-
Elrathia kingii, a ptychopariid from the Middle cambrian
.jpg)
Librostomes make up a large component of the Trilobita. with Traditionally, four orders are placed in the librostoma; they are the: Asaphida, Harpetida, Proetida, and Ptychopariida; however, two primitive Phacopids (Pharostomina and Bavarilla) have natant hypostomes, indicating that the Phacopids are also librostomes.[2] In more recent publications, the asaphid superfamily Trinucleioidea is placed in its own order, Trinucleida,[3][7] however, even today some studies recover them as asaphids.[8]
Evolution
[edit]Origins
[edit]The first librostomes were Ellipsocephaloid Ptychopariida in the family Bigotinidae from the early cambrian.[9] This group was once thought to be in the order redlichiida, but are now considered primitive Ptychopariida.
Evolutionary history
[edit]-
-
-
Ampyx, An Ordovician Trinucleioid. these trilobites may have gone in single-file lines from deeper water to shallow water at night, mirroring modern Spiny lobsters.
.jpg)
During the Middle Cambrian, the Ptychopariida became the dominant trilobites. Around that time, the Asaphida and Trinucleida would first appear.
The first Harpetida would appear in the late cambrian with the primitive genera Baikadamaspis and Entomaspis of the family Entomaspididae.
The first Proetida appeared during the cambrian-ordovician transition. Since the earliest Phacopida (which are most likely librostomes) appeared during the early ordovician, it is assumed that a late cambrian sister taxon was present.[2]
During the Ordovician, the Ptychopariida declined. After the decline of the Ptychopariida, the order Asaphida rose to prominence, becoming the dominant order of trilobites by the end of the mid-ordovician.
The End-Ordovician extinction event would drastically reduce trilobite diversity, with librostomes included. The already endangered Ptychopariida would go extinct. All trilobites with planktonic or Nektonic life stages would go extinct,[10] which included the swimming Proetida family Telephinidae, and all Asaphids & Trinucleids except for the raphiophorid Raphiophorus, which would go extinct shortly after in the Silurian.
Diversity
[edit]Librostomes occupied many niches, sizes, and ecologies. Both some of the largest (Ordovician asaphids Isotelus rex, and Hungioides) and smallest Trilobites (Ordovician ptychopariid Acanthopleurella stipulae).[11] Many trilobites in the group had some ability to stay above the sea floor, such as asaphids in the superfamilies Cyclopygoidea and Remopleuroidea,[12][13] proetids in the family Telephinidae, and perhaps some Cheirurid phacopids such as Deiphon and Crotalocephalus.
The Asaphida, Ptychopariida (and Phacopida if included) are some of the most morphologically and cladistically diverse orders of Trilobites, while the Proetida and Harpetida had a more modest morphological diversity, the former (sometimes referred to as 'garden variety trilobites')[14] containing the most diverse family of trilobites in terms of genera, and the latter being more modest in both terms of diversity.
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ Two primitive calymenines, (Pharostomina and Bavarilla), had natant hypostomes, suggesting that the Cambrian sister taxon is likely also natant, making them Librostomes.[2]
- ^ Arguably all Post-Frasnian triobites as phacopids are cladistically included
References
[edit]- ^ Ontogeny, hypostome attachment and trilobite classification. RA Fortey, Palaeontology, 1990
- ^ a b c "Phacopida fact sheet". trilobites.info.
- ^ a b Bignon, Arnaud; Waisfield, Beatriz G.; Vaccari, Emilio; Chatterton, Brian D. E. (2020). "Reassessment of the Order Trinucleida (Trilobita)". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 18 (13): 1061–1077. Bibcode:2020JSPal..18.1061B. doi:10.1080/14772019.2020.1720324. S2CID 212995185.
- ^ "The Hypostome".
- ^ Whittington, H. B. "Reflections on the Classification of the Trilobita". University of Cambridge.
- ^ Whittington, Harry B. (2003). "The trilobite family Nileidae: morphology and classification". Palaeontology. 46 (4): 635–646. Bibcode:2003Palgy..46..635W. doi:10.1111/1475-4983.00313.
- ^ "Trilobite order Trinucleioidea". trilobites.info.
- ^ Beech, James D.; Bottjer, David J.; Smith, Nathan D. (2024-10-15). "Parallel evolution of unusual 'harpiform' morphologies in distantly related trilobites". Journal of Paleontology: 1–12. doi:10.1017/jpa.2024.47. ISSN 0022-3360.
- ^ "The earliest trilobites".
- ^ Chatterton, Brian D. E.; Speyer, Stephen E. (April 1989). "Larval ecology, life history strategies, and patterns of extinction and survivorship among Ordovician trilobites". Paleobiology. 15 (2): 118–132. Bibcode:1989Pbio...15..118C. doi:10.1017/S0094837300009313. ISSN 0094-8373.
- ^ Forli, Maurizio; Guerrini, Andrea (2022), Forli, Maurizio; Guerrini, Andrea (eds.), "Scorpions, Ants, and Other Stone Insects. The Understanding of Trilobites Over the Centuries", The History of Fossils Over Centuries: From Folklore to Science, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 417–442, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-04687-2_23, ISBN 978-3-031-04687-2, retrieved 2024-10-01
- ^ Esteve, Jorge; López-Pachón, Matheo (2023-09-01). "Swimming and feeding in the Ordovician trilobite Microparia speciosa shed light on the early history of nektonic life habits". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 625: 111691. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2023.111691. ISSN 0031-0182.
- ^ Shiino, Yuta; Kuwazuru, Osamu; Suzuki, Yutaro; Ono, Satoshi; Masuda, Chihiro (2014-06-01). "Pelagic or benthic? Mode of life of the remopleuridid trilobite Hypodicranotus striatulus. | EBSCOhost". openurl.ebsco.com. Retrieved 2024-10-01.
- ^ Lieberman, Bruce S.; Karim, Talia S. (2010-03-01). "Tracing the trilobite tree from the root to the tips: A model marriage of fossils and phylogeny". Arthropod Structure & Development. Fossil Record and Phylogeny of the Arthropoda. 39 (2): 111–123. doi:10.1016/j.asd.2009.10.004. ISSN 1467-8039.
External links
[edit]- https://trilobites.info/Trilobites.info A guide to the orders of trilobites
