National Vulnerability Database
The National Vulnerability Database (NVD) is the U.S. government repository of standards-based vulnerability management data represented using the Security Content Automation Protocol (SCAP). This data enables automation of vulnerability management, security measurement, and compliance. NVD includes databases of security checklists, security related software flaws, misconfigurations, product names, and impact metrics. NVD supports the Information Security Automation Program (ISAP). NVD is managed by the U.S. government agency the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
On Friday March 8, 2013, the database was taken offline after it was discovered that the system used to run multiple government sites had been compromised by a software vulnerability of Adobe ColdFusion.[1][2]
The vulnerabilities in the NVD originate from the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) list, maintained by MITRE. New vulnerabilities are assigned by MITRE and CVE Numbering Authorities and subsequently added to the NVD.[3]
CVE Enrichment
[edit]When vulnerabilities are added to the list of Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs), the NVD assigns them a score using the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS)[4][5]. This score is based on metrics such as access complexity and potential impact[6], allowing organizations to prioritize remediation efforts depending on the severity.[4]
In June 2017, threat intel firm Recorded Future revealed that the median lag between a CVE being revealed to ultimately being published to the NVD is 7 days and that 75% of vulnerabilities are published unofficially before making it to the NVD, giving attackers time to exploit the vulnerability.[7]
In August 2023, the NVD initially marked an integer overflow bug in old versions of cURL as a 9.8 out of 10 critical vulnerability. cURL lead developer Daniel Stenberg responded by saying this was not a security problem, the bug had been patched nearly 4 years prior, requested the CVE be rejected, and accused NVD of "scaremongering" and "grossly inflating the severity level of issues".[8] MITRE disagreed with Stenberg and denied his request to reject the CVE, noting that "there is a valid weakness ... which can lead to a valid security impact."[9] In September 2023, the issue was rescored by the NVD as a 3.3 "low" vulnerability, stating that "it may (in theory) cause a denial of service" for attacked systems, but that this attack vector "is not especially plausible".[10]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ at 17:55, Jack Clark in San Francisco 14 Mar 2013. "Downed US vuln catalog infected for at least TWO MONTHS". www.theregister.co.uk. Retrieved 2019-10-29.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ "US national vulnerability database hacked."
- ^ NIST. "CVEs and the NVD Process". nvd.nist.gov.
- ^ a b Townsend, Kevin (3 April 2024). "CVE and NVD – A Weak and Fractured Source of Vulnerability Truth". SecurityWeek. Retrieved 28 May 2025.
- ^ Zhang, Su; Ou, Xinming; Caragea, Doina (2015-12-31). "Predicting Cyber Risks through National Vulnerability Database". Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective. 24 (4–6): 194–206. doi:10.1080/19393555.2015.1111961. ISSN 1939-3555. S2CID 30587194.
- ^ "NVD - CVSS v2 Equations". nvd.nist.gov. Archived from the original on 2013-12-21.
- ^ "75% of Vulns Shared Online Before NVD Publication". Dark Reading. 7 June 2017. Retrieved 2019-10-29.
- ^ Stenberg, Daniel (26 August 2023). "CVE-2020-19909 is everything that is wrong with CVEs". Daniel Stenberg's Blog. Retrieved 2023-08-26.
- ^ "curl - Bogus report filed by anonymous - CVE-2020-19909". curl.se. Retrieved 2023-08-31.
- ^ "NVD - CVE-2020-19909". nvd.nist.gov. Archived from the original on 2023-09-05. Retrieved 2023-09-07.
External links
[edit]- Official website
- Security Content Automation Protocol (SCAP)
- Packet Storm
- Exploit Database
- Security Content Database
.svg){kind=small} | This United States government–related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |