Talk:13 Reasons Why

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 13 Reasons Why article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 180 days

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 December 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Other talk page banners

This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2017, when it received 14,934,202 views.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 13 times. The weeks in which this happened:

Requested move 9 January 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 04:12, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13 Reasons Why → ?
Thirteen Reasons Why → ?

– I have already nominated two requested moves today, unrelated to this. That does not seem to be illegal, so I ahve gone forward with this. There does not seem to be an unwritten rule that says the TV series is spelt with 13 and the novel is spelt with Thirteen. Just doing this to figure out the consensus. 122.60.65.44 (talk) 00:44, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support moves to Thirteen Reasons Why (TV series) and Thirteen Reasons Why (novel) per WP:CRITERIA. No good reason at all why the book and TV series aren't consistent when artwork and publicity are. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:29, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A big problem here is that the WP:COMMONNAME for the TV series is actually "13 Reasons Why", plus that's how Netflix is referring to it in the promotional media and their press site, despite the fact it uses the stylized "Thirteen Reasons Why" in the title intro card. So the proposal In ictu oculi offered, while the easiest thing to do, wouldn't work. Something should definitely be done here, but I am not sure what really. If you were to move them as 13 Reasons Why → 13 Reasons Why (TV series) and Thirteen Reasons Why → Thirteen Reasons Why (novel), you wouldn't be able to have a consistent primary disambiguation title either (13 Reasons Why or Thirteen Reasons Why). So my stance is to keep the titles as it is right now because their hatnotes should be able to bring awareness to the readers of which way to go. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:46, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It must be pointed out that the cover for the first edition of the novel spells Thirteen Reasons Why as Th1rteen R3asons Why. That is where Netflix got the idea to stylize the name like that in the first place. However, all references to the Netflix presentation, on Netflix' official sites and elsewhere, are to 13 Reasons Why. Not a rule, unwritten or otherwise, just simple fact. There is a clear demarcation between the two without having to add on which came from which media. Use of Template:About suffices for any disambiguation related to how they might sound alike. — Myk Streja ^(beep) 18:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't see any point in making it Thirteen Reasons Why (TV series) when 13 Reasons Why is a much cleaner way to distinguish between the novel and the TV show. Saimcheeda (talk) 02:22, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sreed103.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Undue weight tag

@Joeyconnick: There was no discussion on said tag and I didn't think the tag was currently applicable to the page (the criticism as it stands is not undue and if someone were to try to "fix" it is there's the risk of creating a WP:FALSEBALANCE). So I removed it. I don't take issue with you reinstating the tag per se but if that's the only reason you reinstated it, I was hoping you'd reconsider why it was necessary to do so? What I did is not unheard of. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 08:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone object to the tag being removed again? I'll leave this for a few days in case someone disagrees on the merits of the tag itself. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 08:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]