This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
This is a historical article, not a daily tally sheet. If someone drops out or loses, do not erase them; rather, refer to them as having run and lost, dropped out, etc.
Looks like there are going to be multiple challengers for Lynch. So far Harmony Wu has received attention on Kos and other left leaning blogs. It is now certain that there will be a challenger, how many and who is yet to be determined. -- 18:31, 22 March 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.216.39.121 (talk)
pls stop adding speculators on a democratic election
Someone went through and just labeled everyone that was a democrat and "safe" not really npov. The fact is these things change over time, the are undated, no link to actual page and they are pure speculation. The election is not over yet, labeling someone according to a speculator before people have a chance to even vote is rediculous. If there are actual polls taken feel free to source those but listing a speculators opinion is silly as differnt ones frequently have different opinions based on the data. -Tracer9999 (talk) 19:48, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
