Talk:2024 New York Proposal 1
![]() | 2024 New York Proposal 1 is currently a Politics and government good article nominee. Nominated by — Rhododendrites talk \\ at 17:24, 12 January 2025 (UTC) Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.) Short description: New York state constitutional amendment proposal extending rights protections |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sourcing
[edit]This article makes claims without sources. This is a violation of Wikipedia's terms. Meh130 (talk) 20:04, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
This passed
[edit]someone might wanna update this as it passed with 61.8% of the vote 125.236.174.47 (talk) 05:01, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Move to New York Equal Rights Amendment?
[edit]Checking to see if it would be controversial to move this to New York Equal Rights Amendment. This wouldn't involve a significant change in the content, but reframe to be about the law (and whatever happens with the law moving forward). @CGP05 and Snowman304: thoughts? — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:29, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Probably not, to be consistent with the other similar referendum articles CGP05 (talk) 17:26, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- IMO consistently is not a goal in itself if there are other reasons. Regardless, it looks like someone has reframed this page to be about an amendment, and not a proposal. Either the previous framing should be restored (a proposal to amend) or the title should be moved. Thinking about it more, I think it does make sense to keep it about the proposal for now, until/unless a bunch of sources emerge about the effect of the amendment itself. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:04, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Done. The reframing wasn't quite as pervasive as I thought on first glance. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:54, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- IMO consistently is not a goal in itself if there are other reasons. Regardless, it looks like someone has reframed this page to be about an amendment, and not a proposal. Either the previous framing should be restored (a proposal to amend) or the title should be moved. Thinking about it more, I think it does make sense to keep it about the proposal for now, until/unless a bunch of sources emerge about the effect of the amendment itself. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:04, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
GA?
[edit]Thinking about nominating this over at GAN. Any suggestions/thoughts before I do? — Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:54, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Map
[edit]@ZackCarns: Thanks for the map! Could you confirm it's based on finalized election results? I noticed we still had some numbers from preliminary/projected sources until recently. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:26, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- I just updated the map based on what the NYT has it at. ZackCarns (talk) 21:26, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees awaiting review
- B-Class Abortion articles
- Low-importance Abortion articles
- WikiProject Abortion articles
- B-Class Discrimination articles
- Low-importance Discrimination articles
- WikiProject Discrimination articles
- B-Class Elections and Referendums articles
- WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles
- B-Class LGBTQ+ studies articles
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles
- B-Class New York (state) articles
- Low-importance New York (state) articles