Talk:3Delight

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Animation: American Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Where's the beef?

I think it behooves whoever marks an article for quality issues to put forth some discussion on the issues they want to be addressed, and how the article could be better. Personally, I see nothing wrong with the level of detail presented in this article. It seems only mildly excessive to list each development code name of a piece of software that has had annual releases since its inception, but the fact that it has had new releases with such regularity I do find of interest. It also seems incongruent to mark an article as a stub and then also mark it for excessive detail. Wikipedia really needs to get its act together on how it's going to document software. Personally, I'd rather see errors of excess rather than omission. Dlw20070716 (talk) 16:26, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would say a piece of history would be welcome. By the way, the version list is outdated: last 3Delight major version is 10, not 9. --Hibou57 (talk) 19:34, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 3Delight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080827233109/http://www.3delight.com/en/uploads/docs/3delight/3delight_tech_specs.pdf to http://www.3delight.com/en/uploads/docs/3delight/3delight_tech_specs.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:53, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]