Talk:Agora Hills

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Agora Hills article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in hip hop music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in hip hop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in hip hop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in hip hop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in hip hop musicTemplate:WikiProject Women in hip hop musicWomen in hip hop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Agora Hills appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 February 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that "Agora Hills" is named after the location of the ashram where Doja Cat lived growing up?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Agora Hills.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 17:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that "Agora Hills" is named after the location of the ashram where Doja Cat lived growing up? Source: A heel turn for the ages from pop’s reigning provocateur, The Sydney Morning Herald
- ALT1: ... that Doja Cat raps an entire verse of "Agora Hills" in a valley girl accent? Source: Doja Cat’s 'Scarlet': All 17 Songs Ranked, Billboard
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Nia Archives

5x expanded by Cybertrip (talk). Self-nominated at 12:52, 27 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Agora Hills; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Please note that you are not QPQ-exempt (18 previous credits) and you need to provide one within a week of being prompted (well, really within a week of nomination). Schwede 66 22:02, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Schwede66, hi yes sorry I am well aware of that. When nominating I was unaware that I would unexpectedly have to be AFK until the 6th; is it ok if I delay this nom a few more days and complete the QPQ this weekend? Thanks —cybertrip👽 ( 💬 • 📝)

Sure. All good. Schwede 66 15:05, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cybertrip: Just a follow-up ping for the QPQ. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 07:09, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Schwede66 and Narutolovehinata5: I've started a review, sorry again for the delay. —cybertrip👽 ( 💬 • 📝) 18:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

QPQ review complete. —cybertrip👽 ( 💬 • 📝) 08:18, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Full review needed now that QPQ has been provided. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:45, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: @Cybertrip: The above image doesn't meet WP:DYKIMG as it isn't in the article. Viriditas (talk) 21:44, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Viriditas: Apologies, I removed the image. —cybertrip👽 ( 💬 • 📝) 13:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cybertrip: I will review now. Viriditas (talk) 20:40, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is mostly well-written, polished, and even professional in some areas. There are some issues with short sentences that I don't like, but these tend to be common in Wikipedia song articles, so I will ignore them and chalk it up to my personal pet peeve. Hooks appear designed for interest and length, so no problems there. Sources check out; no issues with Earwig except for the "fourth studio album" wording, which is really the only way to say it, so nothing actionable. I thought it was odd that NPR didn't have a numerical ranking, but it appears to be a "mixtape" list with no order. QPQ done and image licensing is good. The only thing I could find strange about this article was the lack of any negative critical commentary. I may be wrong in assuming there is some out there, but this article would have us believe that everybody loves the song and video. I'm not sure what to say about that, but unless those sources exist, I would say this article is good to go. Viriditas (talk) 23:32, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]