Talk:Alice's Wonderland Bakery

Alice's Wonderland Bakery has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 16, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: American / Television / Computer Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Animation / Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Alice Disney Junior Poster.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:52, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting of "Broadcast" section

@BrickMaster02: Can you explain what you mean here by "improper formatting"? There's not really anything mentioned about formatting specifically in MOS:TVRELEASE, and I can not find any policies/guidelines that reject the way I phrased and cited the information. Can you please cite a specific policy/guildline and/or explain your issue with the information? Thanks. Pamzeis (talk) 14:45, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just reinstated it, my apologies. I thought it was some unreliable source, until I checked it. Sorry for reverting your edit. BrickMaster02 (talk) 18:42, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Unsuccessful.🌶️Jala peño🌶️ Don't click this link! 19:29, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Alice's Wonderland Bakery/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jalapeño (talk · contribs) 19:29, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quick fail criteria

N It is a long way from meeting any one of the six GA criteria (WP:GACR)
Y No copyright violations
Y No cleanup banners
Y Stable
Y No previous GA nomination

The lead and the first 2 sections lack any sources at all, which are arguably the most important parts of the article, since one of the 2 sections lacking sources is the list of actors, and the other being the plot of the movie. Since most people viewing Wikipedia only read the lead section, the fact that it is unsourced is a major problem. This is why I am quick-failing this nomination.

Almost 1/3 of the sources are from Showbuzz Daily, which is a blog, and is a low-quality source.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

Passed. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:07, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Alice's Wonderland Bakery/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 05:47, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

First off, I'd like to note some of the reasons GA1 was flawed: lead sections do not need citations for material elsewhere in the article, and plot summaries do not need citations. Here's a more typical review for the page, and the changes are mostly copy cleanup.

Also want to shout out BrickMaster02 for keeping the page clean. Children's TV attracts a lot of vandalism, so that is always a larger task than for most pages. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:11, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~One general question: have any further episodes been released since July 21?~~ It appears not.

Copy changes

Before the season tables

lesser-extent should be "a lesser extent"
- Done
resulting either missing "in"
- Done
Is there a citation for the cast list?
- The show's end credits are used for this in accordance to WP:PRIMARY
- Is the Mark Williams (disambiguation) page linked for Mark Williams (actor)?
  - Done

Production

Correct typo on "Lewis Caroll" [sic]
- Done
three-layers frosted cakes Should just be "three-layer"
- Done
greenlit to series, should be "the" series
- Done
children of that time Perhaps rephrase to "modern-day children". As worded "that time" might refer to 1951 or earlier, and later sentences make it quite clear that is not the case.
- Done
these include: Remove unnecessary colon or change entirely to "including"
- Done
"Disney Legend Kathryn Beaumont" is the award so integral to her that it merits listing here?
- Removed

Music

the series music director is "the series" redundant here? or maybe "music director for the series" to avoid what should be "the series's music director"
- Removed

Reception

"a fun treat, but not one of Disney's standouts." Sentence fragment quote, so period outside of quotes (MOS:LOGICAL)
- Done

Spot checks

4: The Futon Critic episode list. This is also the origin of some of the production codes. No inaccuracies seen. Y
17: April 1, 2022, ratings from SBD. Premiere had 190,000 viewers though an episode airing later in the day had 270,000. Y
34: Release of 7 episodes on June 28 per Digital Trends. Y
35: Animation World Network article. This contains Beyl's quote; the "heritage project" wording; the use of food to connect cultures; You have to really know what you want the character to do so that they can be rigged properly.; “And then the Princess of Hearts and the Queen of Hearts and the King are inspired by Cuban cuisine and culture. The set design and even the dialogue - we have Spanish phrases and dishes, their costumes, the palace - that was another opportunity to infuse more culture into the series.”; If we want to do an upside-down cake, we can actually make it upside down.. Y The various quotes are mostly what Earwig snags.
46: Common Sense Media review. Quote is accurately reproduced, and Moulton's comments are well summarized by the article. Y

Images

The show poster is non-free and has an appropriate NFUR. The 1951 Alice image is apparently permissible as not being published without a copyright notice in its time. Encouragement: Add alt text.

Done

@Sammi Brie: hopefully, all done. Pamzeis (talk) 12:56, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.