Jump to content

Talk:Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is a promotional piece for the ARP Church. Not one source is cited that is not related to the ARP church. I am restoring the advert tag. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.101.65.66 (talk) 19:39, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

the allegations are false--none of the footnotes has any connection to the church and thefre is nothing "promotional" about it. Rjensen (talk) 20:06, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Using this template is a lot simpler than going through the article and adding citation needed tags all over the place, but I could do that and put in the third party template or ref improve, if you would feel better about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.101.65.66 (talk) 20:23, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
okay Rjenson, unless you've done a lot of work to make it appear that you're someone else, I figured out who you are. We are on the same side and have even had some of the same teachers. I can't understand why we're not seeing this page the same way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.101.65.66 (talk) 20:35, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
no i'm real and I also wrote part of the article (on the Northern Synod) and resent false charges. If something is inaccurate please specify it, and please tell us the secret RS that you are depending on but have not shared. Rjensen (talk) 21:28, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article uses bold font in a way that is inconsistent with Wikipedia's style, such as the use of bold font 'Mr.' before staff names. This makes the content of entire article suspect. I agree with the comment above that this article is promotional.

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:25, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]