The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism
The contents of the Light It Up Blue page were merged into Autism Speaks on 8 April 2017. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
16912 Rhiannon (talk·contribs) has been paid by Beutler Ink on behalf of Bob and Suzanne Wright. COI disclosed on Talk page here
In the lede there is: "The autism rights movement and neurodiversity advocates see autism as a difference rather than a disease that needs to be cured". There are some references to criticism in the "Activities" section, and a good deal of critical coverage in the "Views" section. The criticism is there. signed, Willondon (talk) 14:34, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is this really enough though? People have made extended critiques on this matter. Many of them made. by the very people they claim to represent. I'm autistic and I am yet to meet another autistic person who supports autism speaks in anyway. Truth be told, in the views of most autistic people (including myself) less than a paragraph haphazardly thrown in to this article isn't the kind of criticism AS deserves. They've done a lot of harm. Skyethesudoer (talk) 00:22, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's not enough. The criticisms are only briefly mentioned, and each time, it's followed by an entire paragraph (or more) of Autism Speaks's response (and the responses always misrepresent the criticism)
Indeed AS is a hate group, consciously spreading hateful misinformation about Autism. The Autistic community is fighting to repair the damage they do, but with a Wikipedia page like this I understand that we're fighting a uphill battle. 87.212.64.74 (talk) 07:02, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I did not mean there should be no criticism, only that it should not be ghettoed away in its own section. The whole article must be written from a mainstram perspective.
I agree. As an autistic person, Autism speaks still proposes torturous ABA therapy for example which causes abourlt 30% of the children traumatized by it to commit suicide. We definitely need a promiant section listing all the critisism against AS, like for example, that to this day, they do not have an autistic board member. 2601:40B:C200:1F8:C1FD:71DE:F3E6:39B6 (talk) 04:24, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Autism speaks should be put as a hate group. They don't advocate for us, they try to destroy us. They also have been caught, I repeat, CAUGHT, spreading misinformation. Autism is not a disease. Saewooxyyz (talk) 09:27, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now: I agree with this, but this is not proper usage of an edit request. Edit requests are supposed to be specific "change X to Y" or "add X after Y", while following all Wikipedian policies, including providing reliable sources to support any claims made. — Urro[talk][edits] ⋮ 15:03, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The views section mentions they view autism as a disease, so I guess thats good enough. On Wikipedia the popularity of a subject determents weather or not it has a page. Anthony2106 (talk) 12:15, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now: I agree with this, but this is not proper usage of an edit request. Edit requests are supposed to be specific "change X to Y" or "add X after Y", while following all Wikipedian policies, including providing reliable sources to support any claims made. 