Talk:Battle of Sheriffmuir

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European / Early Modern C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Sheriffmuir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090626134008/http://www.scotwars.com/html/battle_of_sheriffmuir.htm to http://www.scotwars.com/html/battle_of_sheriffmuir.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:47, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neil Oliver

There was a request from an IP editor of the article page for the qualification of Neil Oliver whose book A History of Scotland is quoted several times in this article. I have that book and in the information about the author it just says that he trained as an archaeologist at Glasgow University and the Wikipedia article about him says that he qualified as an archaeologist but does not quote a source. In any case I don't think that it is a mandatory requirement on Wikipedia to include the qualification of the author whose book you are quoting as a source.QuintusPetillius (talk) 15:37, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neil Oliver is not an archaeologist though he has a degree in the subject. He has not, as far as I can see published any papers in archaeology journals. He is, by profession, a journalist, writer and TV presenter. His History of Scotland is not well regarded.

Panama1958 (talk) 01:51, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
  The latter is merely an opinion with which many will disagree. Acorn897 (talk) 21:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Casualties

The casualty figures are suspiciously exact, given the much rounder figures for the numbers of combatants. In any event, they would be almost impossible to calculate to single digits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.108.92.22 (talk) 15:41, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]