Jump to content

Talk:Bioeconomy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What is biotechonomy? I have never heard of it, and am surprised to learn that it is a widely used synonym of anything.

definition

[edit]

The European Bioeconomy in 2030 -publication offers a very different definition: "Bioeconomy refers to the sustainable production and conversion of biomass into a range of food, health, fibre and industrial products and energy." Jankunnas (talk) 18:06, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps this definition from the European Bioeconomy in 2030 is more clear and complete than those definitions that heavily reference biotechnology and 'economic activity derived from scientific and research activity'. Of course traditional sectors such as agriculture and forestry are part of biotechnology as defined here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biotechnology, however the construction of such a biotechnology heavy definition may lead a reader to feel broader activities such as forestry and agriculture or other more established economic activities based on the use of materials from our biosphere are not included in the bioeconomy. I have seen government agencies and scientific articles referencing both the narrower and broader definitions. Perhaps some clarifications could be made. Icedbuddha (talk) 02:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bioeconomy does definitely include biotechnology - incorporation of biotechnology does belong within bioeconomy, as an incorporation of information belongs to the operation of offices. - Arnljótur Bjarki Bergsson — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.208.252.241 (talk) 10:26, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why is biggest world economy related article removed?

[edit]

April 2012 President Barack Obama of the United States announced intentions to encourage biological manufacturing methods, with a National Bioeconomy Blueprint.[1] 141.218.35.38 (talk) 01:28, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Bioeconomy" and the related concept "biobased economy" appear only in the title. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:39, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References

Added info

[edit]

I added: Comparison of fossil fuel and biobased economy

  • With a fossil fuel economy substances as gasoline, fuel oil, diesel, naphta, kerosine, LPG, and other are converted to: energy, chemical products, food, materials
  • With a biobased economy substances as (syn)gas, sugars, oil, fibres and other are converted to energy, chemical products, (animal) food, biomaterials

the idea however (in which I succeeded only partially) is to have more information on what substance/compounds (ie sugars) are converted more to energy, food or materials. Ie several things can be used for a variery of things, depending on the production method or bioorganism used. Ie sugars can be converted to certain plastics as poly lactic acid (PLA), or can be used as food. Perhaps schematics are needed for this

Still to mention: styrene (from biomass), polyethylene (from biomass), ethylene glycol (ie for use in PET and polyethylenefurane), polyhydroxyalkaneoates

91.182.159.99 (talk) 09:16, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Biobased economy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:56, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Biobased economy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]