Talk:Boy (2hollis album)

Boy (2hollis album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 13, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Passed. Medxvo (talk) 20:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Boy (2hollis album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Locust member (talk · contribs) 01:59, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Medxvo (talk · contribs) 19:25, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well-written

"fanbase, and allowed him" - I don't think there's a need for the comma
- Done
"second studio album 2 in 2023" - "second studio album, 2, in 2023"
- Done
"The album is entirely written" - "Boy is entirely written" -- to avoid the repetition of "the album" a bit
- Done, also changed to "was written" since the action of writing it already happened; my mistake
"Brady Brickner-Wood of Pitchfork described the album as "an even clubbier, gummier electropop record" 2" - I think this sentence is missing something
- Done Whoops, I restructured this sentence not too long ago and forgot to include "than"
"two-minute long drop" - "two-minute-long drop"
- Done
"side chained synthesizers" - "side-chained synthesizers"
- Done
"one of the best tracks of the week" - "one of the best tracks of the week of its release" -- to avoid confusion
- Done

2. Verifiable
Spotchecks - 1(b), 1(d), 1(f), 1(h), 1(j), 2, 4, 7(b), 9(a), 9(d), 10(a), 10(d), 14(b), 15(b) - no issues except for ref 2

I can't see "Cliche" in ref 2
- Oops, I added in an Apple Music ref to support cliche (whiplash and cliche were released as one single)

3. Broad // 4. Neutral // 5. Stable
No issues

6. Illustrated

The link to the Apple Music source can be added, I also suggest using a summary formatting similar to this one, which pretty much leaves all parameters blank except when needed, and they'll be auto-generated
- Done thanks for this!

That's all, good work on the article, Locust member! Also, I know you're probably sick of Evermore by now, but I'd greatly appreciate it if you have the time to review this GAN, which should be the last article before nominating the Evermore topic at GTC :)) Medxvo (talk) 19:25, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!! All comments should be addressed; I just hopped on the site and saw you reviewed this literally 20 minutes ago haha. Also, I'll take a look at your GAN :) Locust member (talk) 19:45, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!! Everything looks good, passing now :)) Medxvo (talk) 20:02, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.