Talk:Called to Common Mission

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Called to Common Mission is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lutheranism Low‑importance

	Called to Common Mission is part of WikiProject Lutheranism, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Lutheranism on Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to Lutheran churches, Lutheran theology and worship, and biographies of notable Lutherans. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.LutheranismWikipedia:WikiProject LutheranismTemplate:WikiProject LutheranismLutheranism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Weasel word tag

This page has great potential to delve into the text of CCM and the differing opinions regarding it within both the ELCA and the ECUSA. However, some greater depth of text could be provided, and citations of statements made by specific groups within or members of the two churches are key both to the factuality and the credibility of this article. Bayberrylane 00:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I realize it's been more than a decade, but I second the notion that additional resources are needed. Cheers! --Elfabet (talk) 16:51, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]