Jump to content

Talk:Cambridge Reference Sequence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Have anyone even read the paper on revised CRS?

[edit]

https://www.nature.com/articles/ng1099_147


"The last suggestion represents a compromise between accuracy (correcting the numbering to account for the single C residue at nt 3,106 and 3,107) and" Valery Zapolodov (talk) 15:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]