Talk:Camunda
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Addressing the Promotional Content Tag
[edit]Regarding the tag indicating that the article may contain promotional content, I believe that much of the potentially promotional material has been removed by @Brandon—thank you for that. I have also added encyclopedic text based on sources from two reputable trade publications, Heise and Handelsblatt, presented from a neutral perspective. I believe the issue has been adequately addressed. Are there any suggestions for further improvements? I would like to review the tag again in February 2025. Thank you for your attention to this matter .--~~~~ Sciman (talk) 18:10, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- I've cut a bunch more promotional content and there is still work to be done. There is still far too much content that relies on primary sources and has a promotional-ish tone. Brandon (talk) 19:00, 17 January 2025 (UTC)