Talk:Canada First Defence Strategy

Military history: Technology / Canadian / North America Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Canadian military history task force
	North American military history task force

Canada Mid‑importance

Canada
portal

WikiProject
Canada

Canada
notice board

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Arctic

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arctic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arctic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArcticWikipedia:WikiProject ArcticTemplate:WikiProject ArcticArctic
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Why does this article refer to the government by the name of the current prime minister? Is it not simply the Government of Canada? The strategy is the strategy, regardless of who the sitting prime-minister was at the time that the strategy was approved. It would seem, more and more, that we refer to the "government of the people" by the name of the leader of the governing party. KPB — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.30.154.78 (talk) 01:07, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]