This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s
This article was copy edited by Stfg, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 4 January 2012.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors
Is it just me, or is this caption of the photo in the Post-production section totally backwards and confusing? "Evans as pre-serum Steve Rogers before (top) and after (bottom) he was visually reduced." Where the top half of the photo shows the big & buff Evans, presumably AFTER and the lower half as the skinny kid, which would have required visual reduction. Recommend rewording this to something like "Evans as post-serum Steve Rogers before (top) and after (bottom) he was visually reduced." FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 17:13, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The scene takes place before (“pre”) Rogers receives the serum. Evans was naturally buff while filming it. The effect was that they made him appear skinny.—TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:33, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, it took me a while to figure out that they were strictly talking about the post-production process...and not the plot point process of him taking the serum. Cheers! FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 13:36, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This film has 7 setting categories. That is excessive. It is an American film. I think we could either do Films set in the United States and Films set in Europe, or since it is an American film just do Films set in Europe.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:04, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Being an American film doesn't mean anything when it comes to the setting. A more important question is how much of a film needs to take place somewhere for it to count as being "set" in that place? I don't usually deal much with categories so I don't really know the answer to that one. - adamstom97 (talk) 08:18, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]