Talk:Catholicos of the East

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oriental Orthodoxy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on the Oriental Orthodox Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Oriental OrthodoxyWikipedia:WikiProject Oriental OrthodoxyTemplate:WikiProject Oriental OrthodoxyOriental Orthodoxy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: India Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Christianity in India (assessed as High-importance).

Merge Proposal

Concerning the proposal to merge with Catholicos of the East and Malankara Metropolitan

Strongly object. Catholicos of the East is a title used by many churches not just Malankara. In fact the correct title for the Malankara Catholicos is Maphrian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.116.119.40 (talk) 08:39, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It cannot be merged why?

Both are different Titles. Catholicos= Originated in early 4th century in Persian Church. Malankara Metropolitan= Originated in India and considered successor of Malankara Elders.The evolution of the title is like this. Historical Archdeacon of Malankara==> Marthoma==>Malankara Metropolitan

Catholicos of the East is a title used in the Syriac Orthodox Church and Church of the East in the Persian region.

'CATHOLICOS OF THE EAST' was originally the title conferred to the ecclesiastical head of the Christian congregation in the erstwhile Persian Empire that extended from Mesopotamia in the west, to the boundaries of the present day Afghanistan and Northern India in the east. In the beginning the bishop who assumed this title was known as MAJOR METROPOLITAN / CATHOLICOS OF SELEUCIA; Seleucia being the capital city of Persian Empire. This institution was initially set up to serve as a link between the Patriarch of Antioch, and the Syrian Christian Community in Persia who found the journey to the Patriarchate at Antioch, hazardous because of the bitter political rivalry between the Roman and Persian empires. This title was abolished in 1860 CE. However this title was reinstated in Malankara (Kerala) in 1912.This title mostly holds the Spiritual power.(Like President of India)

Malankara Metropolitan this title was awarded by the King of Travancore and King of Cochin to the Metropolitan of the Malankara Church by an official proclamation. This title mostly holds the Administrative power.(Like Prime Minister of India)

These titles can be held by two people at the same time in Malankara Church. However because of some practical issues, Catholicos holds the additional title of Malankara Metropolitan also. Kokkarani(talk)

Support There is already an article dedicated to both the Malankara Metropolitan and Catholicos of the East thus there is no need for there to be a separate article purely for the joint titles of the head of the Indian Orthodox Church (IOC). Also, the content of the Catholicos of the East and Malankara Metropolitan article looks at the history of the Catholicos of the East, not the history of the head of the IOC, whom it concerns. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mugsalot (talk • contribs) 16:45, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion is rather stale, and there doesn't seem to be a consensus for any particular merge. Mugsalot is right that there is a lot of discussion of the Catholicos of the East, but that could be construed as background/history for the Indian catholicos. As the dual titles/posts of Catholicos of the East and Malankara Metropolitan have been held jointly by the same person since 1934, and seem set to continue thus (written in the constitution of the church), a better merge would seem to be between Catholicos of the East and Malankara Metropolitan and Malankara Metropolitan. The independent history of these two titles could be discussed on the same page, ensuring that the catholicos section focusses on the application of the title in India and links to Catholicos of the East for readers interested in that broader concept. I'll start the discussion for that on the proposed target; so, at Talk:Catholicos of the East and Malankara Metropolitan. Klbrain (talk) 00:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moving article

Please stop moving article without discussion. Student7 (talk) 12:07, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to tell that to Arun. Lijujacobk (talk) 07:58, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Names of the churches

May I suggest listing all the names of each church only once. Then using the preferred name by each throughout the rest of the article.Student7 (talk) 23:43, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is impossible to follow. You will have to get shorter names for each church so that an unknowledgeable reader can follow the arguments. Going on and on about a church with six names, which sometimes changes, is just not reasonable. I thought I had read somewhere that each faction has a short name consisting of one word each. That is what we need here. Or we need to abbreviate or something. Student7 (talk) 03:45, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How about "Jacobites" and "Syrians?" It means sticking to these names for most of the article! Student7 (talk) 03:46, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization

This is a proper name, like Archbishop of Canterbury. English idiom requires that it be capitalized Catholicos of the East, as the article text has it; if this is uncontroversial, WP:RM will do it quickly. If not, please come tell them, and we can discuss at length. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 00:21, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POV

Hard for me to pick/understand sides since I don't. But last part of pov labeled section is aimed at one faction who "claims" or "believes" something that contradicts another. All that can be asserted is what a faction believes about itself. This needs to be sorted into "beliefs about each faction" clearly and what that faction believes about the other (I suppose) if not too WP:POV. Both need to be stated as "beliefs" not fact. "Claims." A bit hard to do when it is your side, but there you have it.

In other words, I can assert that "I believe that I am smart. I believe that you are stupid." Unfortunately I must now follow this with a balanced remark. "You think you are smart. You think I am stupid." I may not like nor agree with the last two sentences, but it represents a balanced article on the topic of our IQ! Student7 (talk) 02:32, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Baseless article

This article needs a clean up. Indian church is an autonomous body within the Syriac Orthodox Church. The two parallel fractions exists in the same church for authority and power. All other materials are useless and unnecessary. Refer to AIR 1995 SC 2001, the Supreme Court Judgement on this fraction fight in Orthodox Church. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexyalex (talk • contribs) 13:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like to request a merger of two articles, or a deletion of this one. Can you give us a pointer to the "other article?" is it Syriac Orthodox Church? Student7 (talk) 22:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I dont understand what you are saying. They are 2 different churches since 1975 both with their own hierarchy and Catholicoses. Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church is a autocephalous church under the catholicos of the east and Malankara Syrian Orthodox Church is an autonomous church under Patriarch of Antioch. Please read the wiki article on both the churches.

ܠܝܓܘ Liju ലിജു לג"ו (talk) 13:18, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alexyalex is claiming that this church is one and the same with some other church/article. He claims (with no reference nor any article) that a court has decided they are one church for purposes of ownership. Is this true?

Several questions: why does Alexyalex not have the name of the article of the church this one is supposed to be a part of? Why does he not supply a pointer to the court decision about the two churches being the same?

Having said that, this article has long been poorly footnoted. Why has it been allowed to continue in such sad shape for so long? Are there no supporting footnotes from WP:RELY sources? Student7 (talk) 23:02, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there is only one church - The Orthodox Church of India (Malankara). AIR 1995 SC 2001 (if someone has doubt refer it!!!, its a public document), clearly states there is only one Orthodox church in India and the Hon'ble court ordered to conduct a common meeting to select the Catholicos and Malankara Metroplotan for the church. Note that, both the parallel fractions paid the expenses to the court for conducting that election in 2002. These parallel fractions call themselves by name - "Malankara Orthodox Syrian church" and "Jacobite Syrian Orthodox Church". In actual they are only parallel groups and not churches. And moreover, there is dispute in all churches built before 2002. I comes to around 1036 churches in 1995. The claim of autocephaly is also wrong. The 1st article of the constitution of Malankara fraction says "its autonomous part of the Syrian Orthodox Church, having the hierarchial head the Patriarch of Antioch and the autonomous leader the Catholicos of East" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexyalex (talk • contribs) 09:27, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are saying "look it up." Instead, I would like you to furnish an online footnote [ http:....] type pointer. Having a court say so is obviously not enough. I can get a court (somewhere) to say that you are now a part of my church. That doesn't mean that you will attend my church on the next holy day! Are you saying that this other group now considers themselves part of your group? Doesn't seem likely. You need to convince the editor(s) of this article of what you are saying. Student7 (talk) 11:58, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

exacty. Say I start a new church today and say that the Eastern orthodox churches and Roman Catholic Church are part of it and that my church is the largest church in the world, will that be a valid claim. Say that I have a court order from some court. ܠܝܓܘ Liju ലിജു לג"ו (talk) 14:27, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SInce u asked, am referring to a recent 2007 case on this fraction fight in the Orthodox Church in india. http://www.malankaraorthodoxalmayavedhi.org/Judgement/kathipparathadom.htm When u read this, u can get a clear view, of the claims of both fractions and the popular JUDGEMENT of the Hon'ble Supreme court of India. And dont neglect the Supreme court, since it interprets and even makes laws in India. No courts in India can take a decision against the Supreme Court Verdict as per Indian Constitution . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexyalex (talk • contribs) 16:56, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jacobites, you will find find plenty of articles about your own people and organisations in Wikipedia. Have fun editing them, instead of venting all your frustration on this article. There are several online forums and even facebook where you can share your views and suggestions. Why use this article for that purpose? Do we Orthodox people edit your articles to fill them with our views? We don't. So please have some politeness, if not respect.Swordofcherubim (talk) 18:00, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lead too long

@Givegainincrease: this article was tagged with {{lead too long}} on 10 November 2015, but you have made it worse. Please trim the introduction to a much shorter summary. Detailed information should either be moved into the body of the article and supported by reliable sources, or removed. – Fayenatic London 17:15, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Catholicos of the East. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:29, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Patriarch of the Church of the East

The Catholicos of the East which is a title that is historically associated with the Patriarch of Seleucia-Ctesiphon. So it should be merged with the corresponding article (Patriarch of the Church of the East) to avoid misunderstandings.
There are different articles for other usages, like

Maphrian (for historical Syriac Orthodox Church usage),
Catholicos of the East and Malankara Metropolitan (for Malankara Syrian Orthodox Church usage]]),
Catholicos of India (for the Jacobite Syrian Christian Church usage) etc.

And there is also a disambiguation page for Catholicos of the East. Br Ibrahim john (talk) 04:33, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the patriarch of the CotE is the primary topic, this can be moved to the disambiguation title and this title can then redirected there. I am inclined to think this is best now that this page has been reduced to a dab page. Srnec (talk) 01:04, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]