Talk:Checheyigen
Checheyigen has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 21, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Checheyigen appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 November 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by LunaEclipse talk 17:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- ... that Checheyigen's political acumen ensured that her family became one of the most powerful in the Mongol Empire?
- Source: Broadbridge 2018, pp. 240–241
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:37, 19 October 2024 (UTC).
- Hook fact checks out and is cited in-article. Article is eligible and in good shape all around, and I can see no evidence of copyvio. QPQ also checks out. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 21:26, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Checheyigen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: AirshipJungleman29 (talk · contribs) 23:46, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 15:39, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
I'll try to get to this one soon! Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 15:39, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Preliminary stuff: Image is good and CC-licensed (and has alt-text, yay!) It's also stable, and none of the quickfail criteria apply. Moving on...
Text:
- excellent is a bit puffy and I feel unhelpful - since it could be interpreted as particularly enjoyable marriages. I know you're getting at strategic marriages, so that might be better to use here.
- Changed to "advantageous".
- Nice. - G
- Changed to "advantageous".
- Wouldn't the big parenthetical statement work better as an EFN here? Not necessary obvs
- Done.
- It might be good to explicitly state that the year of her death is unknown in the later life section.
- Annoyingly, no source actually says that. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Argh, always a shame. Well, nothing you can do there - G
- Annoyingly, no source actually says that. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:57, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Overall very good, broad coverage of a fairly obscure figure. Source review to come.
Checked Broadbridge 2016, May 2018, Broadbridge 2018, and Dunnell 2023. No discrepancies I can find, and it seems to cover these sources quite well. I couldn't find any other good sources on her, so I assume you did your research! Looks good to me. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 16:08, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- History good articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class Women's History articles
- Unknown-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- GA-Class Mongols articles
- Low-importance Mongols articles
- GA-Class Mongol Empire articles
- Mongol Empire task force articles
- WikiProject Mongols articles
- WikiProject Women in Green meetup 7 articles
- All WikiProject Women in Green pages
- Wikipedia Did you know articles